临床实践中的药物基因组学:巴西药物标签中的生物标志物信息。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Guilherme Suarez-Kurtz
{"title":"临床实践中的药物基因组学:巴西药物标签中的生物标志物信息。","authors":"Guilherme Suarez-Kurtz","doi":"10.1002/bcp.70278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This review examines the PGx annotations in package inserts (bulas in Brazilian Portuguese) approved by ANVISA, the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency, for 19 gene-drug pairs with strong or moderate recommendations for initial dosing alteration in the CPIC (Clinical Pharmacogenetic Implementation Consortion) guidelines and PGx testing required or recommended by health regulatory agencies listed in the PharmGKB Drug Label Annotations table. It is assumed that drug-gene pairs with these two features should be prioritized for adoption by the Brazilian Public Health System (SUS). PGx annotations were distributed across seven of the ten sections of the bulas and classified as PGx testing required (n = 5), PGx testing recommended (n = 5), actionable PGx (n = 4) and no PGx clinical information (n = 4). Pairwise comparison of assigned PGx levels in ANVISA bulas vs. the selected regulatory agencies revealed poor concordance (Cohen's kappa coefficient κ < 0.20 for all pairs); however, discordance among these agencies is also considerable (Fleiss's kappa coefficient κ = 0.08). The frequency of the examined PGx risk biomarkers in representative Brazilian cohorts range from <0.1% to 10.8%. Importantly, Native Americans (0.4% of the current Brazilian population), display wide PGx diversity, both interethnically and in relation to non-Indigenous Brazilians. The author suggests that addition of a PGx section to the ANVISA bulas would avoid dispersion of clinically relevant PGx information across sections, assure integration of this information with SUS determinations and prevent discrepancies across sections, as observed in the bulas for thiopurines.</p>","PeriodicalId":9251,"journal":{"name":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pharmacogenomics in clinical practice: Biomarker information in Brazilian drug labels.\",\"authors\":\"Guilherme Suarez-Kurtz\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/bcp.70278\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This review examines the PGx annotations in package inserts (bulas in Brazilian Portuguese) approved by ANVISA, the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency, for 19 gene-drug pairs with strong or moderate recommendations for initial dosing alteration in the CPIC (Clinical Pharmacogenetic Implementation Consortion) guidelines and PGx testing required or recommended by health regulatory agencies listed in the PharmGKB Drug Label Annotations table. It is assumed that drug-gene pairs with these two features should be prioritized for adoption by the Brazilian Public Health System (SUS). PGx annotations were distributed across seven of the ten sections of the bulas and classified as PGx testing required (n = 5), PGx testing recommended (n = 5), actionable PGx (n = 4) and no PGx clinical information (n = 4). Pairwise comparison of assigned PGx levels in ANVISA bulas vs. the selected regulatory agencies revealed poor concordance (Cohen's kappa coefficient κ < 0.20 for all pairs); however, discordance among these agencies is also considerable (Fleiss's kappa coefficient κ = 0.08). The frequency of the examined PGx risk biomarkers in representative Brazilian cohorts range from <0.1% to 10.8%. Importantly, Native Americans (0.4% of the current Brazilian population), display wide PGx diversity, both interethnically and in relation to non-Indigenous Brazilians. The author suggests that addition of a PGx section to the ANVISA bulas would avoid dispersion of clinically relevant PGx information across sections, assure integration of this information with SUS determinations and prevent discrepancies across sections, as observed in the bulas for thiopurines.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British journal of clinical pharmacology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British journal of clinical pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/bcp.70278\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bcp.70278","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本综述检查了巴西卫生监管机构ANVISA批准的19对基因药物说明书(巴西葡萄牙语)中的PGx注释,这些基因药物对在CPIC(临床药理学实施联盟)指南中有强烈或中等建议的初始剂量改变,以及在PharmGKB药物标签注释表中列出的卫生监管机构要求或推荐的PGx检测。假设具有这两个特征的药物基因对应优先被巴西公共卫生系统(SUS)采用。PGx注释分布在大bulas的10个部分中的7个,分为需要进行PGx检测(n = 5),建议进行PGx检测(n = 5),可操作的PGx (n = 4)和无PGx临床信息(n = 4)。ANVISA bulas中指定PGx水平与选定监管机构的两两比较显示一致性差(Cohen's kappa系数κ)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pharmacogenomics in clinical practice: Biomarker information in Brazilian drug labels.

This review examines the PGx annotations in package inserts (bulas in Brazilian Portuguese) approved by ANVISA, the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency, for 19 gene-drug pairs with strong or moderate recommendations for initial dosing alteration in the CPIC (Clinical Pharmacogenetic Implementation Consortion) guidelines and PGx testing required or recommended by health regulatory agencies listed in the PharmGKB Drug Label Annotations table. It is assumed that drug-gene pairs with these two features should be prioritized for adoption by the Brazilian Public Health System (SUS). PGx annotations were distributed across seven of the ten sections of the bulas and classified as PGx testing required (n = 5), PGx testing recommended (n = 5), actionable PGx (n = 4) and no PGx clinical information (n = 4). Pairwise comparison of assigned PGx levels in ANVISA bulas vs. the selected regulatory agencies revealed poor concordance (Cohen's kappa coefficient κ < 0.20 for all pairs); however, discordance among these agencies is also considerable (Fleiss's kappa coefficient κ = 0.08). The frequency of the examined PGx risk biomarkers in representative Brazilian cohorts range from <0.1% to 10.8%. Importantly, Native Americans (0.4% of the current Brazilian population), display wide PGx diversity, both interethnically and in relation to non-Indigenous Brazilians. The author suggests that addition of a PGx section to the ANVISA bulas would avoid dispersion of clinically relevant PGx information across sections, assure integration of this information with SUS determinations and prevent discrepancies across sections, as observed in the bulas for thiopurines.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.80%
发文量
419
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the British Pharmacological Society, the British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology features papers and reports on all aspects of drug action in humans: review articles, mini review articles, original papers, commentaries, editorials and letters. The Journal enjoys a wide readership, bridging the gap between the medical profession, clinical research and the pharmaceutical industry. It also publishes research on new methods, new drugs and new approaches to treatment. The Journal is recognised as one of the leading publications in its field. It is online only, publishes open access research through its OnlineOpen programme and is published monthly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信