Maria V. Magomedova, Vera A. Ostroumova, Ilya A. Davidov, Ekaterina G. Galanova, Anastasiya V. Starozhitskaya and Anton L. Maximov
{"title":"二甲醚和甲醇在BEA, MRE和MWW结构的沸石上转化为碳氢化合物","authors":"Maria V. Magomedova, Vera A. Ostroumova, Ilya A. Davidov, Ekaterina G. Galanova, Anastasiya V. Starozhitskaya and Anton L. Maximov","doi":"10.1039/D5CY00740B","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >The catalytic properties of zeolite-based catalysts BEA/Al<small><sub>2</sub></small>O<small><sub>3</sub></small>, MCM-22/Al<small><sub>2</sub></small>O<small><sub>3</sub></small>, MRE/Al<small><sub>2</sub></small>O<small><sub>3</sub></small>, and MFI/Al<small><sub>2</sub></small>O<small><sub>3</sub></small> were compared in the conversion of dimethyl ether (DME) and methanol into hydrocarbons at 340 °C under 0.1 MPa (for DME) and 10.0 MPa (for methanol). Catalysts BEA/Al<small><sub>2</sub></small>O<small><sub>3</sub></small>, MCM-22/Al<small><sub>2</sub></small>O<small><sub>3</sub></small>, and MFI/Al<small><sub>2</sub></small>O<small><sub>3</sub></small> with comparable total acidity demonstrated similar activity. However, due to differences in zeolite structure, catalyst stability and product distribution varied. The MCM-22 zeolite with “super-cages” enabled a C<small><sub>5+</sub></small> liquid hydrocarbon yield of 62 wt% under atmospheric pressure. BEA/Al<small><sub>2</sub></small>O<small><sub>3</sub></small>, with a high fraction of mesopores, facilitated the formation of heavier hydrocarbons C<small><sub>14</sub></small>–C<small><sub>16</sub></small>, components of aviation fuel. The MRE-based catalyst exhibited the lowest acidity and activity but showed high selectivity towards C<small><sub>2</sub></small>–C<small><sub>4</sub></small> olefins and operational stability.</p>","PeriodicalId":66,"journal":{"name":"Catalysis Science & Technology","volume":" 19","pages":" 5772-5781"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conversion of dimethyl ether and methanol to hydrocarbons over zeolites with BEA, MRE, and MWW structures\",\"authors\":\"Maria V. Magomedova, Vera A. Ostroumova, Ilya A. Davidov, Ekaterina G. Galanova, Anastasiya V. Starozhitskaya and Anton L. Maximov\",\"doi\":\"10.1039/D5CY00740B\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >The catalytic properties of zeolite-based catalysts BEA/Al<small><sub>2</sub></small>O<small><sub>3</sub></small>, MCM-22/Al<small><sub>2</sub></small>O<small><sub>3</sub></small>, MRE/Al<small><sub>2</sub></small>O<small><sub>3</sub></small>, and MFI/Al<small><sub>2</sub></small>O<small><sub>3</sub></small> were compared in the conversion of dimethyl ether (DME) and methanol into hydrocarbons at 340 °C under 0.1 MPa (for DME) and 10.0 MPa (for methanol). Catalysts BEA/Al<small><sub>2</sub></small>O<small><sub>3</sub></small>, MCM-22/Al<small><sub>2</sub></small>O<small><sub>3</sub></small>, and MFI/Al<small><sub>2</sub></small>O<small><sub>3</sub></small> with comparable total acidity demonstrated similar activity. However, due to differences in zeolite structure, catalyst stability and product distribution varied. The MCM-22 zeolite with “super-cages” enabled a C<small><sub>5+</sub></small> liquid hydrocarbon yield of 62 wt% under atmospheric pressure. BEA/Al<small><sub>2</sub></small>O<small><sub>3</sub></small>, with a high fraction of mesopores, facilitated the formation of heavier hydrocarbons C<small><sub>14</sub></small>–C<small><sub>16</sub></small>, components of aviation fuel. The MRE-based catalyst exhibited the lowest acidity and activity but showed high selectivity towards C<small><sub>2</sub></small>–C<small><sub>4</sub></small> olefins and operational stability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":66,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Catalysis Science & Technology\",\"volume\":\" 19\",\"pages\":\" 5772-5781\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Catalysis Science & Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/cy/d5cy00740b\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catalysis Science & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/cy/d5cy00740b","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Conversion of dimethyl ether and methanol to hydrocarbons over zeolites with BEA, MRE, and MWW structures
The catalytic properties of zeolite-based catalysts BEA/Al2O3, MCM-22/Al2O3, MRE/Al2O3, and MFI/Al2O3 were compared in the conversion of dimethyl ether (DME) and methanol into hydrocarbons at 340 °C under 0.1 MPa (for DME) and 10.0 MPa (for methanol). Catalysts BEA/Al2O3, MCM-22/Al2O3, and MFI/Al2O3 with comparable total acidity demonstrated similar activity. However, due to differences in zeolite structure, catalyst stability and product distribution varied. The MCM-22 zeolite with “super-cages” enabled a C5+ liquid hydrocarbon yield of 62 wt% under atmospheric pressure. BEA/Al2O3, with a high fraction of mesopores, facilitated the formation of heavier hydrocarbons C14–C16, components of aviation fuel. The MRE-based catalyst exhibited the lowest acidity and activity but showed high selectivity towards C2–C4 olefins and operational stability.
期刊介绍:
A multidisciplinary journal focusing on cutting edge research across all fundamental science and technological aspects of catalysis.
Editor-in-chief: Bert Weckhuysen
Impact factor: 5.0
Time to first decision (peer reviewed only): 31 days