全膝关节置换术中膝关节冠状面排列(CPAK)分类的利弊综述

IF 1.5 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Elias Ammann , Natalie Mengis , George Mihai Avram , Michael T. Hirschmann
{"title":"全膝关节置换术中膝关节冠状面排列(CPAK)分类的利弊综述","authors":"Elias Ammann ,&nbsp;Natalie Mengis ,&nbsp;George Mihai Avram ,&nbsp;Michael T. Hirschmann","doi":"10.1016/j.jor.2025.08.042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The increasing interest in modern alignment philosophies for total knee arthroplasty has highlighted the need for a more detailed coronal plane alignment classification system to assess preoperative phenotypes and investigate postoperative outcomes. Currently, the two most commonly used classification systems are the functional knee phenotypes (FKP) and the coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) classification. Since its publication in 2021, the CPAK classification has been utilized globally in various knee-related investigations. This study examines the applications of the CPAK classification to date and summarizes its impact on the personalization of knee surgery. The study aims to identify the limitations of current classification systems and to stimulate future research in personalized knee surgery and knee phenotyping.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16633,"journal":{"name":"Journal of orthopaedics","volume":"71 ","pages":"Pages 16-22"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pros and cons of the coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) classification in total knee arthroplasty – a narrative review\",\"authors\":\"Elias Ammann ,&nbsp;Natalie Mengis ,&nbsp;George Mihai Avram ,&nbsp;Michael T. Hirschmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jor.2025.08.042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The increasing interest in modern alignment philosophies for total knee arthroplasty has highlighted the need for a more detailed coronal plane alignment classification system to assess preoperative phenotypes and investigate postoperative outcomes. Currently, the two most commonly used classification systems are the functional knee phenotypes (FKP) and the coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) classification. Since its publication in 2021, the CPAK classification has been utilized globally in various knee-related investigations. This study examines the applications of the CPAK classification to date and summarizes its impact on the personalization of knee surgery. The study aims to identify the limitations of current classification systems and to stimulate future research in personalized knee surgery and knee phenotyping.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16633,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of orthopaedics\",\"volume\":\"71 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 16-22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of orthopaedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0972978X25003575\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0972978X25003575","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对全膝关节置换术的现代对齐理念的兴趣日益增加,强调需要更详细的冠状面对齐分类系统来评估术前表型和调查术后结果。目前,两种最常用的分类系统是功能性膝关节表型(FKP)和膝关节冠状面排列(CPAK)分类。自2021年发布以来,CPAK分类已在全球范围内用于各种膝关节相关调查。本研究考察了CPAK分类迄今为止的应用,并总结了其对膝关节手术个性化的影响。该研究旨在确定当前分类系统的局限性,并刺激个性化膝关节手术和膝关节表型的未来研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pros and cons of the coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) classification in total knee arthroplasty – a narrative review
The increasing interest in modern alignment philosophies for total knee arthroplasty has highlighted the need for a more detailed coronal plane alignment classification system to assess preoperative phenotypes and investigate postoperative outcomes. Currently, the two most commonly used classification systems are the functional knee phenotypes (FKP) and the coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) classification. Since its publication in 2021, the CPAK classification has been utilized globally in various knee-related investigations. This study examines the applications of the CPAK classification to date and summarizes its impact on the personalization of knee surgery. The study aims to identify the limitations of current classification systems and to stimulate future research in personalized knee surgery and knee phenotyping.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
202
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedics aims to be a leading journal in orthopaedics and contribute towards the improvement of quality of orthopedic health care. The journal publishes original research work and review articles related to different aspects of orthopaedics including Arthroplasty, Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, Trauma, Spine and Spinal deformities, Pediatric orthopaedics, limb reconstruction procedures, hand surgery, and orthopaedic oncology. It also publishes articles on continuing education, health-related information, case reports and letters to the editor. It is requested to note that the journal has an international readership and all submissions should be aimed at specifying something about the setting in which the work was conducted. Authors must also provide any specific reasons for the research and also provide an elaborate description of the results.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信