{"title":"通过CiteSpace对2000年至2023年卵巢癌护理的文献计量学分析","authors":"Anqi Xiong , Xiujing Guo","doi":"10.1016/j.wcn.2025.05.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This study aimed to analyze the existing research on ovarian cancer in the context of multidisciplinary care and identify the contemporary debates.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We used CiteSpace to generate visual collaborative networks and summarize the external characteristics of publications from the Web of Science Core Collection database published between January 1, 2000, and December 5, 2023.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In total, 1261 publications were identified, originating from 284 institutions across 80 countries, published in 113 journals, and authored by 235 researchers. The United States and <em>Gynecologic Oncology</em> had the highest number of publications on this topic. The research was categorized into six major clusters: <em>quality of life</em>, <em>surgery</em>, <em>paclitaxel</em>, <em>ovarian cancer</em>, <em>nurses</em>’ <em>health</em>, and <em>prophylactic oophorectomy</em>. The main hotspots included <em>society</em>, <em>validation</em>, <em>experiences</em>, <em>guidelines</em>, <em>quality of life</em>, <em>breast</em>, <em>association</em>, and <em>uterine cancer</em>.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Research on ovarian cancer care has rapidly expanded to encompass multidisciplinary care. However, international and institutional collaboration remains limited. This study provides researchers with valuable insights into the current landscape, collaborative networks, and major research hotspots in ovarian cancer care. Additionally, the psychological experiences of patients with ovarian cancer and interdisciplinary nursing interventions are promising areas for future research and development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101283,"journal":{"name":"Women and Children Nursing","volume":"3 3","pages":"Pages 51-57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A bibliometric analysis of ovarian cancer care from 2000 to 2023 via CiteSpace\",\"authors\":\"Anqi Xiong , Xiujing Guo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wcn.2025.05.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This study aimed to analyze the existing research on ovarian cancer in the context of multidisciplinary care and identify the contemporary debates.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We used CiteSpace to generate visual collaborative networks and summarize the external characteristics of publications from the Web of Science Core Collection database published between January 1, 2000, and December 5, 2023.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In total, 1261 publications were identified, originating from 284 institutions across 80 countries, published in 113 journals, and authored by 235 researchers. The United States and <em>Gynecologic Oncology</em> had the highest number of publications on this topic. The research was categorized into six major clusters: <em>quality of life</em>, <em>surgery</em>, <em>paclitaxel</em>, <em>ovarian cancer</em>, <em>nurses</em>’ <em>health</em>, and <em>prophylactic oophorectomy</em>. The main hotspots included <em>society</em>, <em>validation</em>, <em>experiences</em>, <em>guidelines</em>, <em>quality of life</em>, <em>breast</em>, <em>association</em>, and <em>uterine cancer</em>.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Research on ovarian cancer care has rapidly expanded to encompass multidisciplinary care. However, international and institutional collaboration remains limited. This study provides researchers with valuable insights into the current landscape, collaborative networks, and major research hotspots in ovarian cancer care. Additionally, the psychological experiences of patients with ovarian cancer and interdisciplinary nursing interventions are promising areas for future research and development.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101283,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Women and Children Nursing\",\"volume\":\"3 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 51-57\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Women and Children Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949751525000257\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women and Children Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949751525000257","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的本研究旨在分析卵巢癌在多学科护理背景下的现有研究,并找出当代的争论。方法利用CiteSpace建立可视化协同网络,对Web of Science Core Collection数据库2000年1月1日至2023年12月5日发表的论文进行外部特征分析。结果共发现1261篇论文,来自80个国家284个机构,发表在113种期刊上,作者235名。美国妇科肿瘤学在这方面的出版物数量最多。该研究分为六大类:生活质量、手术、紫杉醇、卵巢癌、护士健康和预防性卵巢切除术。主要热点包括社会、验证、经验、指南、生活质量、乳腺癌、协会和子宫癌。结论卵巢癌的治疗研究已迅速扩展到多学科治疗。然而,国际和机构合作仍然有限。本研究为研究人员了解卵巢癌治疗的现状、协作网络和主要研究热点提供了有价值的见解。此外,卵巢癌患者的心理体验和跨学科护理干预是未来研究和发展的有希望的领域。
A bibliometric analysis of ovarian cancer care from 2000 to 2023 via CiteSpace
Purpose
This study aimed to analyze the existing research on ovarian cancer in the context of multidisciplinary care and identify the contemporary debates.
Methods
We used CiteSpace to generate visual collaborative networks and summarize the external characteristics of publications from the Web of Science Core Collection database published between January 1, 2000, and December 5, 2023.
Results
In total, 1261 publications were identified, originating from 284 institutions across 80 countries, published in 113 journals, and authored by 235 researchers. The United States and Gynecologic Oncology had the highest number of publications on this topic. The research was categorized into six major clusters: quality of life, surgery, paclitaxel, ovarian cancer, nurses’ health, and prophylactic oophorectomy. The main hotspots included society, validation, experiences, guidelines, quality of life, breast, association, and uterine cancer.
Conclusions
Research on ovarian cancer care has rapidly expanded to encompass multidisciplinary care. However, international and institutional collaboration remains limited. This study provides researchers with valuable insights into the current landscape, collaborative networks, and major research hotspots in ovarian cancer care. Additionally, the psychological experiences of patients with ovarian cancer and interdisciplinary nursing interventions are promising areas for future research and development.