Ferris Nowlan, Noor Shakfa, Tiak Ju Tan, Sibyl Drissler, Elizabeth Sunnucks, Jennifer L. Gorman, Chengxin Yu, Sheng-Ben Liang, Barbara Gruenwald, Ayelet Borgida, Edward L. Chen, Golnaz Abazari, Miralem Mrkonjic, Julie M. Wilson, Kieran R. Campbell, Robert C. Grant, Anne-Claude Gringas, Grainne M. O'Kane, Faiyaz Notta, Steve Gallinger, Hartland W. Jackson
{"title":"摘要:PDAC的综合蛋白质基因组分析揭示了更新的上皮亚型和生存的交叉组学预测因子","authors":"Ferris Nowlan, Noor Shakfa, Tiak Ju Tan, Sibyl Drissler, Elizabeth Sunnucks, Jennifer L. Gorman, Chengxin Yu, Sheng-Ben Liang, Barbara Gruenwald, Ayelet Borgida, Edward L. Chen, Golnaz Abazari, Miralem Mrkonjic, Julie M. Wilson, Kieran R. Campbell, Robert C. Grant, Anne-Claude Gringas, Grainne M. O'Kane, Faiyaz Notta, Steve Gallinger, Hartland W. Jackson","doi":"10.1158/1538-7445.pancreatic25-b116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) chemotherapy regimens are largely uniform, tailored mainly to patient fitness or rare genomic alterations. This strategy fails to capitalize on the disease’s substantial molecular heterogeneity, including variations in copy number alterations, immune infiltration, stromal composition, and cancer cell phenotypes. These features are not independent; they reflect interconnected biological processes and co-evolving pathways that shape tumour progression. Multi-omic integration is therefore essential—not only to capture the complexity of PDAC biology, but also to clarify the molecular basis of tumours classified as ‘intermediate’ by current stromal and cancer taxonomies, thereby enabling rational therapeutic targeting. To this end, we performed imaging mass cytometry on three serial sections of a PDAC tissue microarray (221 resected tumours, ∼4 cores each), generating >800 multiplexed images (40–43 channels) focused on epithelial, immune, or stromal biomarkers. We profiled 76 immune and stromal cell types and states (hypoxic, proliferative, apoptotic, under tension), as well as six tumour phenotypes defined by expression of epithelial transcription factors (GATA6, FOXA2, PDX1), classical markers (AGR2, TFF1, CEACAM6), basal markers (TP63, KRT5, S100A2, CAV1), and other PDAC-associated proteins (S100A4, MMP7, MUC16). These six cancer cell types captured the classical and basal PDAC signatures, along with four discrete “intermediate” states with distinct associations to stromal heterogeneity, RNA subtype (n = 92), tumour ploidy (n = 182), and patient outcome. These phenotypes are also detectable in unmatched single-cell RNA-seq data (n = 163), though with more overlap in marker expression. Using matched 30X whole genome sequencing (n = 182), we identified mutations and copy number alterations linked to shifts in cancer and stromal cell phenotypes, raising the question of which molecular axis best informs clinical prognosis. To address this, we applied a modified version of Stabl, a Lasso-based machine learning approach, to compare across omic layers and identify features most strongly associated with overall survival. Per-modality analysis showed that models incorporating omics outperformed those based on clinical features alone, with imaging data slightly outperforming genomics. Cross-omic integration revealed several prognostically relevant copy number aberrations, fibroblast phenotypes, and cancer cell states. By consolidating information on tumour phenotypes, stromal niches, and genomic alterations, this work aims to focus future drug discovery on the most clinically impactful molecular features in PDAC. Citation Format: Ferris Nowlan, Noor Shakfa, Tiak Ju Tan, Sibyl Drissler, Elizabeth Sunnucks, Jennifer L. Gorman, Chengxin Yu, Sheng-Ben Liang, Barbara Gruenwald, Ayelet Borgida, Edward L. Chen, Golnaz Abazari, Miralem Mrkonjic, Julie M. Wilson, Kieran R. Campbell, Robert C. Grant, Anne-Claude Gringas, Grainne M. O'Kane, Faiyaz Notta, Steve Gallinger, Hartland W. Jackson. Integrative proteogeonomic profiling of PDAC reveals updated epithelial subtypes and cross-omic predictors of survival [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Advances in Pancreatic Cancer Research—Emerging Science Driving Transformative Solutions; Boston, MA; 2025 Sep 28-Oct 1; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(18_Suppl_3): nr B116.","PeriodicalId":9441,"journal":{"name":"Cancer research","volume":"327 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":16.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Abstract B116: Integrative proteogeonomic profiling of PDAC reveals updated epithelial subtypes and cross-omic predictors of survival\",\"authors\":\"Ferris Nowlan, Noor Shakfa, Tiak Ju Tan, Sibyl Drissler, Elizabeth Sunnucks, Jennifer L. Gorman, Chengxin Yu, Sheng-Ben Liang, Barbara Gruenwald, Ayelet Borgida, Edward L. Chen, Golnaz Abazari, Miralem Mrkonjic, Julie M. Wilson, Kieran R. Campbell, Robert C. Grant, Anne-Claude Gringas, Grainne M. O'Kane, Faiyaz Notta, Steve Gallinger, Hartland W. Jackson\",\"doi\":\"10.1158/1538-7445.pancreatic25-b116\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) chemotherapy regimens are largely uniform, tailored mainly to patient fitness or rare genomic alterations. This strategy fails to capitalize on the disease’s substantial molecular heterogeneity, including variations in copy number alterations, immune infiltration, stromal composition, and cancer cell phenotypes. These features are not independent; they reflect interconnected biological processes and co-evolving pathways that shape tumour progression. Multi-omic integration is therefore essential—not only to capture the complexity of PDAC biology, but also to clarify the molecular basis of tumours classified as ‘intermediate’ by current stromal and cancer taxonomies, thereby enabling rational therapeutic targeting. To this end, we performed imaging mass cytometry on three serial sections of a PDAC tissue microarray (221 resected tumours, ∼4 cores each), generating >800 multiplexed images (40–43 channels) focused on epithelial, immune, or stromal biomarkers. We profiled 76 immune and stromal cell types and states (hypoxic, proliferative, apoptotic, under tension), as well as six tumour phenotypes defined by expression of epithelial transcription factors (GATA6, FOXA2, PDX1), classical markers (AGR2, TFF1, CEACAM6), basal markers (TP63, KRT5, S100A2, CAV1), and other PDAC-associated proteins (S100A4, MMP7, MUC16). These six cancer cell types captured the classical and basal PDAC signatures, along with four discrete “intermediate” states with distinct associations to stromal heterogeneity, RNA subtype (n = 92), tumour ploidy (n = 182), and patient outcome. These phenotypes are also detectable in unmatched single-cell RNA-seq data (n = 163), though with more overlap in marker expression. Using matched 30X whole genome sequencing (n = 182), we identified mutations and copy number alterations linked to shifts in cancer and stromal cell phenotypes, raising the question of which molecular axis best informs clinical prognosis. To address this, we applied a modified version of Stabl, a Lasso-based machine learning approach, to compare across omic layers and identify features most strongly associated with overall survival. Per-modality analysis showed that models incorporating omics outperformed those based on clinical features alone, with imaging data slightly outperforming genomics. Cross-omic integration revealed several prognostically relevant copy number aberrations, fibroblast phenotypes, and cancer cell states. By consolidating information on tumour phenotypes, stromal niches, and genomic alterations, this work aims to focus future drug discovery on the most clinically impactful molecular features in PDAC. Citation Format: Ferris Nowlan, Noor Shakfa, Tiak Ju Tan, Sibyl Drissler, Elizabeth Sunnucks, Jennifer L. Gorman, Chengxin Yu, Sheng-Ben Liang, Barbara Gruenwald, Ayelet Borgida, Edward L. Chen, Golnaz Abazari, Miralem Mrkonjic, Julie M. Wilson, Kieran R. Campbell, Robert C. Grant, Anne-Claude Gringas, Grainne M. O'Kane, Faiyaz Notta, Steve Gallinger, Hartland W. Jackson. Integrative proteogeonomic profiling of PDAC reveals updated epithelial subtypes and cross-omic predictors of survival [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Advances in Pancreatic Cancer Research—Emerging Science Driving Transformative Solutions; Boston, MA; 2025 Sep 28-Oct 1; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(18_Suppl_3): nr B116.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9441,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer research\",\"volume\":\"327 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.pancreatic25-b116\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.pancreatic25-b116","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)的化疗方案在很大程度上是统一的,主要是根据患者的适应性或罕见的基因组改变而定制的。该策略未能利用该疾病的实质性分子异质性,包括拷贝数改变、免疫浸润、基质组成和癌细胞表型的变化。这些特征不是独立的;它们反映了形成肿瘤进展的相互关联的生物过程和共同进化途径。因此,多组学整合是必不可少的,不仅可以捕获PDAC生物学的复杂性,还可以阐明当前基质和癌症分类中被分类为“中间”的肿瘤的分子基础,从而实现合理的治疗靶向。为此,我们对PDAC组织微阵列的三个连续切片(221个切除的肿瘤,每个约4个核心)进行了成像质量细胞术,产生了&;gt;800多路图像(40-43通道)聚焦于上皮、免疫或基质生物标志物。我们分析了76种免疫和基质细胞类型和状态(缺氧、增殖、凋亡、紧张),以及六种肿瘤表型,这些表型由上皮转录因子(GATA6、FOXA2、PDX1)、经典标记(AGR2、TFF1、CEACAM6)、基础标记(TP63、KRT5、S100A2、CAV1)和其他pdac相关蛋白(S100A4、MMP7、MUC16)的表达定义。这六种癌细胞类型捕获了经典和基础PDAC特征,以及四种离散的“中间”状态,这些状态与基质异质性、RNA亚型(n = 92)、肿瘤倍性(n = 182)和患者预后有明显的关联。这些表型在不匹配的单细胞RNA-seq数据中也可以检测到(n = 163),尽管在标记表达上有更多的重叠。使用匹配的30X全基因组测序(n = 182),我们确定了与癌症和间质细胞表型转移相关的突变和拷贝数改变,提出了哪个分子轴最能影响临床预后的问题。为了解决这个问题,我们应用了Stabl的改进版本,这是一种基于lasso的机器学习方法,用于跨组学层进行比较,并确定与总体生存最密切相关的特征。单模态分析显示,结合组学的模型优于仅基于临床特征的模型,影像学数据略优于基因组学。交叉组学整合揭示了一些与预后相关的拷贝数畸变、成纤维细胞表型和癌细胞状态。通过整合肿瘤表型、基质生态位和基因组改变的信息,这项工作旨在将未来的药物发现重点放在PDAC中最具临床影响力的分子特征上。引文格式:Ferris nolan, Noor Shakfa, Tiak Ju Tan, Sibyl Drissler, Elizabeth Sunnucks, Jennifer L. Gorman, Chengxin Yu, shengben Liang, Barbara Gruenwald, Ayelet Borgida, Edward L. Chen, Golnaz Abazari, Miralem Mrkonjic, Julie M. Wilson, Kieran R. Campbell, Robert C. Grant, Anne-Claude Gringas, Grainne M. O'Kane, Faiyaz Notta, Steve Gallinger, Hartland W. JacksonPDAC的综合蛋白质基因组分析揭示了更新的上皮亚型和跨组学生存预测因子[摘要]。摘自:AACR癌症研究特别会议论文集:胰腺癌研究进展-新兴科学驱动变革解决方案;波士顿;2025年9月28日至10月1日;波士顿,MA。费城(PA): AACR;癌症研究2025;85(18_Suppl_3): nr B116。
Abstract B116: Integrative proteogeonomic profiling of PDAC reveals updated epithelial subtypes and cross-omic predictors of survival
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) chemotherapy regimens are largely uniform, tailored mainly to patient fitness or rare genomic alterations. This strategy fails to capitalize on the disease’s substantial molecular heterogeneity, including variations in copy number alterations, immune infiltration, stromal composition, and cancer cell phenotypes. These features are not independent; they reflect interconnected biological processes and co-evolving pathways that shape tumour progression. Multi-omic integration is therefore essential—not only to capture the complexity of PDAC biology, but also to clarify the molecular basis of tumours classified as ‘intermediate’ by current stromal and cancer taxonomies, thereby enabling rational therapeutic targeting. To this end, we performed imaging mass cytometry on three serial sections of a PDAC tissue microarray (221 resected tumours, ∼4 cores each), generating >800 multiplexed images (40–43 channels) focused on epithelial, immune, or stromal biomarkers. We profiled 76 immune and stromal cell types and states (hypoxic, proliferative, apoptotic, under tension), as well as six tumour phenotypes defined by expression of epithelial transcription factors (GATA6, FOXA2, PDX1), classical markers (AGR2, TFF1, CEACAM6), basal markers (TP63, KRT5, S100A2, CAV1), and other PDAC-associated proteins (S100A4, MMP7, MUC16). These six cancer cell types captured the classical and basal PDAC signatures, along with four discrete “intermediate” states with distinct associations to stromal heterogeneity, RNA subtype (n = 92), tumour ploidy (n = 182), and patient outcome. These phenotypes are also detectable in unmatched single-cell RNA-seq data (n = 163), though with more overlap in marker expression. Using matched 30X whole genome sequencing (n = 182), we identified mutations and copy number alterations linked to shifts in cancer and stromal cell phenotypes, raising the question of which molecular axis best informs clinical prognosis. To address this, we applied a modified version of Stabl, a Lasso-based machine learning approach, to compare across omic layers and identify features most strongly associated with overall survival. Per-modality analysis showed that models incorporating omics outperformed those based on clinical features alone, with imaging data slightly outperforming genomics. Cross-omic integration revealed several prognostically relevant copy number aberrations, fibroblast phenotypes, and cancer cell states. By consolidating information on tumour phenotypes, stromal niches, and genomic alterations, this work aims to focus future drug discovery on the most clinically impactful molecular features in PDAC. Citation Format: Ferris Nowlan, Noor Shakfa, Tiak Ju Tan, Sibyl Drissler, Elizabeth Sunnucks, Jennifer L. Gorman, Chengxin Yu, Sheng-Ben Liang, Barbara Gruenwald, Ayelet Borgida, Edward L. Chen, Golnaz Abazari, Miralem Mrkonjic, Julie M. Wilson, Kieran R. Campbell, Robert C. Grant, Anne-Claude Gringas, Grainne M. O'Kane, Faiyaz Notta, Steve Gallinger, Hartland W. Jackson. Integrative proteogeonomic profiling of PDAC reveals updated epithelial subtypes and cross-omic predictors of survival [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Advances in Pancreatic Cancer Research—Emerging Science Driving Transformative Solutions; Boston, MA; 2025 Sep 28-Oct 1; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(18_Suppl_3): nr B116.
期刊介绍:
Cancer Research, published by the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), is a journal that focuses on impactful original studies, reviews, and opinion pieces relevant to the broad cancer research community. Manuscripts that present conceptual or technological advances leading to insights into cancer biology are particularly sought after. The journal also places emphasis on convergence science, which involves bridging multiple distinct areas of cancer research.
With primary subsections including Cancer Biology, Cancer Immunology, Cancer Metabolism and Molecular Mechanisms, Translational Cancer Biology, Cancer Landscapes, and Convergence Science, Cancer Research has a comprehensive scope. It is published twice a month and has one volume per year, with a print ISSN of 0008-5472 and an online ISSN of 1538-7445.
Cancer Research is abstracted and/or indexed in various databases and platforms, including BIOSIS Previews (R) Database, MEDLINE, Current Contents/Life Sciences, Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, Science Citation Index, Scopus, and Web of Science.