摘要:肿瘤信息ctDNA、ddPCR、CA19-9和CEA评估转移性胰腺癌患者早期治疗动态

IF 16.6 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
James Lee, Amber Habowski, Baho Sidiqi, Adrianna Kapusta, Jenna Battaglia, Daniel King, James Lee
{"title":"摘要:肿瘤信息ctDNA、ddPCR、CA19-9和CEA评估转移性胰腺癌患者早期治疗动态","authors":"James Lee, Amber Habowski, Baho Sidiqi, Adrianna Kapusta, Jenna Battaglia, Daniel King, James Lee","doi":"10.1158/1538-7445.pancreatic25-a126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Blood-based biomarkers may enable earlier assessment of treatment response than imaging in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. Tumor-informed circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) approaches may be more sensitive, whereas tumor-naïve ctDNA profiling using KRAS mutations may offer a cheaper and faster alternative for most patients with PDAC. CA19-9 and CEA are also commonly used as tumor markers for PDAC treatment monitoring. We hypothesized that ctDNA, ddPCR, CA19-9, and CEA dynamics would be associated with treatment response. Methods: In this prospective, single-center study, patients with metastatic PDAC were monitored using blood-based biomarkers with high temporal resolution. Signatera (a ctDNA reporter panel informed by whole-exome sequencing) and digital droplet PCR (ddPCR of KRAS codon 12/13 mutations) were used along with standard CA19-9 and CEA. Blood markers were drawn at baseline and after 2, 4, and 8 weeks of treatment. Treatment response was measured by the RECIST 1.1 criteria or clinical deterioration. The primary objective was to evaluate the association of progression-free survival (PFS) with biomarker changes from baseline to 2 or 4 weeks. Results: Nineteen patients were enrolled, comprising 11 starting first-line (1L) therapy and 8 starting 2L. Sufficient tissue was available for tumor-informed ctDNA profiling in 12 of 19 patients (63%). ddPCR data were evaluated in 14 of the 19 patients and CA19-9 & CEA were evaluated in 19 of 19 patients. Overall median PFS was 3.5 months (1.9 - 4.3 months). A ctDNA reduction of at least 20% compared to baseline by week 2 and week 4 of treatment was associated with longer PFS (p=0.002 and p<0.001, respectively). Fluctuations in ddPCR by week 2 and week 4 compared to baseline were not associated with longer PFS at any threshold (all p-values>0.10 and p-values>0.19, respectively). Fluctuations in CA19-9 by week 2 of treatment were not associated with longer PFS at any threshold (all p-values>0.05); however, an increase of CA19-9 greater than 50% by week 4 of treatment was associated with worse PFS (p=0.002). Fluctuations in CEA by week 2 of treatment and week 4 of treatment were not associated with longer PFS at any threshold (all p-values>0.05). Among patients without a ctDNA increase at week 2, those who demonstrated a >80% reduction in ddPCR had significantly longer PFS (p<0.0001). Conclusions: Early reduction in ctDNA levels as early as 2-weeks and CA19-9 increases by week 4 of treatment were associated with worse PFS. These findings suggest utility of blood-based biomarkers for early treatment monitoring and could inform a prospective interventional trial evaluating ctDNA dynamics to inform early treatment decisions. Citation Format: James Lee, Amber Habowski, Baho Sidiqi, Adrianna Kapusta, Jenna Battaglia, Daniel King, James Lee. Tumor-informed ctDNA, ddPCR, CA19-9, and CEA to evaluate early treatment dynamics in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Advances in Pancreatic Cancer Research—Emerging Science Driving Transformative Solutions; Boston, MA; 2025 Sep 28-Oct 1; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(18_Suppl_3): nr A126.","PeriodicalId":9441,"journal":{"name":"Cancer research","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":16.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Abstract A126: Tumor-informed ctDNA, ddPCR, CA19-9, and CEA to evaluate early treatment dynamics in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer\",\"authors\":\"James Lee, Amber Habowski, Baho Sidiqi, Adrianna Kapusta, Jenna Battaglia, Daniel King, James Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1158/1538-7445.pancreatic25-a126\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction Blood-based biomarkers may enable earlier assessment of treatment response than imaging in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. Tumor-informed circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) approaches may be more sensitive, whereas tumor-naïve ctDNA profiling using KRAS mutations may offer a cheaper and faster alternative for most patients with PDAC. CA19-9 and CEA are also commonly used as tumor markers for PDAC treatment monitoring. We hypothesized that ctDNA, ddPCR, CA19-9, and CEA dynamics would be associated with treatment response. Methods: In this prospective, single-center study, patients with metastatic PDAC were monitored using blood-based biomarkers with high temporal resolution. Signatera (a ctDNA reporter panel informed by whole-exome sequencing) and digital droplet PCR (ddPCR of KRAS codon 12/13 mutations) were used along with standard CA19-9 and CEA. Blood markers were drawn at baseline and after 2, 4, and 8 weeks of treatment. Treatment response was measured by the RECIST 1.1 criteria or clinical deterioration. The primary objective was to evaluate the association of progression-free survival (PFS) with biomarker changes from baseline to 2 or 4 weeks. Results: Nineteen patients were enrolled, comprising 11 starting first-line (1L) therapy and 8 starting 2L. Sufficient tissue was available for tumor-informed ctDNA profiling in 12 of 19 patients (63%). ddPCR data were evaluated in 14 of the 19 patients and CA19-9 & CEA were evaluated in 19 of 19 patients. Overall median PFS was 3.5 months (1.9 - 4.3 months). A ctDNA reduction of at least 20% compared to baseline by week 2 and week 4 of treatment was associated with longer PFS (p=0.002 and p<0.001, respectively). Fluctuations in ddPCR by week 2 and week 4 compared to baseline were not associated with longer PFS at any threshold (all p-values>0.10 and p-values>0.19, respectively). Fluctuations in CA19-9 by week 2 of treatment were not associated with longer PFS at any threshold (all p-values>0.05); however, an increase of CA19-9 greater than 50% by week 4 of treatment was associated with worse PFS (p=0.002). Fluctuations in CEA by week 2 of treatment and week 4 of treatment were not associated with longer PFS at any threshold (all p-values>0.05). Among patients without a ctDNA increase at week 2, those who demonstrated a >80% reduction in ddPCR had significantly longer PFS (p<0.0001). Conclusions: Early reduction in ctDNA levels as early as 2-weeks and CA19-9 increases by week 4 of treatment were associated with worse PFS. These findings suggest utility of blood-based biomarkers for early treatment monitoring and could inform a prospective interventional trial evaluating ctDNA dynamics to inform early treatment decisions. Citation Format: James Lee, Amber Habowski, Baho Sidiqi, Adrianna Kapusta, Jenna Battaglia, Daniel King, James Lee. Tumor-informed ctDNA, ddPCR, CA19-9, and CEA to evaluate early treatment dynamics in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Advances in Pancreatic Cancer Research—Emerging Science Driving Transformative Solutions; Boston, MA; 2025 Sep 28-Oct 1; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(18_Suppl_3): nr A126.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9441,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer research\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.pancreatic25-a126\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.pancreatic25-a126","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于血液的生物标志物可以比影像学更早地评估转移性胰腺癌患者的治疗反应。肿瘤信息循环肿瘤DNA (ctDNA)方法可能更敏感,而tumor-naïve使用KRAS突变的ctDNA分析可能为大多数PDAC患者提供更便宜和更快的选择。CA19-9和CEA也常用作PDAC治疗监测的肿瘤标志物。我们假设ctDNA、ddPCR、CA19-9和CEA动力学与治疗反应有关。方法:在这项前瞻性的单中心研究中,使用基于血液的高时间分辨率生物标志物监测转移性PDAC患者。Signatera(全外显子组测序的ctDNA报告小组)和数字液滴PCR (KRAS密码子12/13突变的ddPCR)与标准CA19-9和CEA一起使用。在基线和治疗2周、4周和8周后抽取血液标志物。通过RECIST 1.1标准或临床恶化来衡量治疗反应。主要目的是评估无进展生存期(PFS)与从基线到2周或4周的生物标志物变化的关系。结果:19例患者入组,其中11例开始一线(1L)治疗,8例开始2L治疗。19例患者中有12例(63%)有足够的组织可用于肿瘤知情ctDNA谱分析。对19例患者中的14例进行ddPCR数据评估,对19例患者中的19例进行CA19-9和CEA评估。总体中位PFS为3.5个月(1.9 - 4.3个月)。与治疗第2周和第4周相比,ctDNA减少至少20%与更长的PFS相关(p=0.002和p&;lt;0.001)。与基线相比,第2周和第4周的ddPCR波动与任何阈值下更长的PFS无关(所有p值&;gt;0.10和p值&;gt;0.19)。治疗第2周时CA19-9的波动与任何阈值下更长的PFS无关(p值均为0.05);然而,治疗第4周时CA19-9升高超过50%与PFS恶化相关(p=0.002)。治疗第2周和第4周时CEA的波动与任何阈值下的PFS均无相关性(p值均为0.05)。在第2周没有ctDNA升高的患者中,那些表现出&;gt;ddPCR减少80%显著延长PFS (p<0.0001)。结论:早在治疗2周ctDNA水平的早期降低和治疗第4周CA19-9水平的升高与PFS恶化有关。这些发现表明,基于血液的生物标志物可用于早期治疗监测,并可为评估ctDNA动态的前瞻性干预性试验提供信息,从而为早期治疗决策提供信息。引文格式:James Lee, Amber Habowski, Baho Sidiqi, Adrianna Kapusta, Jenna Battaglia, Daniel King, James Lee。肿瘤信息ctDNA、ddPCR、CA19-9和CEA评估转移性胰腺癌患者早期治疗动态[摘要]。摘自:AACR癌症研究特别会议论文集:胰腺癌研究进展-新兴科学驱动变革解决方案;波士顿;2025年9月28日至10月1日;波士顿,MA。费城(PA): AACR;癌症研究2025;85(18_Suppl_3): nr A126。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Abstract A126: Tumor-informed ctDNA, ddPCR, CA19-9, and CEA to evaluate early treatment dynamics in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer
Introduction Blood-based biomarkers may enable earlier assessment of treatment response than imaging in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. Tumor-informed circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) approaches may be more sensitive, whereas tumor-naïve ctDNA profiling using KRAS mutations may offer a cheaper and faster alternative for most patients with PDAC. CA19-9 and CEA are also commonly used as tumor markers for PDAC treatment monitoring. We hypothesized that ctDNA, ddPCR, CA19-9, and CEA dynamics would be associated with treatment response. Methods: In this prospective, single-center study, patients with metastatic PDAC were monitored using blood-based biomarkers with high temporal resolution. Signatera (a ctDNA reporter panel informed by whole-exome sequencing) and digital droplet PCR (ddPCR of KRAS codon 12/13 mutations) were used along with standard CA19-9 and CEA. Blood markers were drawn at baseline and after 2, 4, and 8 weeks of treatment. Treatment response was measured by the RECIST 1.1 criteria or clinical deterioration. The primary objective was to evaluate the association of progression-free survival (PFS) with biomarker changes from baseline to 2 or 4 weeks. Results: Nineteen patients were enrolled, comprising 11 starting first-line (1L) therapy and 8 starting 2L. Sufficient tissue was available for tumor-informed ctDNA profiling in 12 of 19 patients (63%). ddPCR data were evaluated in 14 of the 19 patients and CA19-9 & CEA were evaluated in 19 of 19 patients. Overall median PFS was 3.5 months (1.9 - 4.3 months). A ctDNA reduction of at least 20% compared to baseline by week 2 and week 4 of treatment was associated with longer PFS (p=0.002 and p&lt;0.001, respectively). Fluctuations in ddPCR by week 2 and week 4 compared to baseline were not associated with longer PFS at any threshold (all p-values&gt;0.10 and p-values&gt;0.19, respectively). Fluctuations in CA19-9 by week 2 of treatment were not associated with longer PFS at any threshold (all p-values&gt;0.05); however, an increase of CA19-9 greater than 50% by week 4 of treatment was associated with worse PFS (p=0.002). Fluctuations in CEA by week 2 of treatment and week 4 of treatment were not associated with longer PFS at any threshold (all p-values&gt;0.05). Among patients without a ctDNA increase at week 2, those who demonstrated a &gt;80% reduction in ddPCR had significantly longer PFS (p&lt;0.0001). Conclusions: Early reduction in ctDNA levels as early as 2-weeks and CA19-9 increases by week 4 of treatment were associated with worse PFS. These findings suggest utility of blood-based biomarkers for early treatment monitoring and could inform a prospective interventional trial evaluating ctDNA dynamics to inform early treatment decisions. Citation Format: James Lee, Amber Habowski, Baho Sidiqi, Adrianna Kapusta, Jenna Battaglia, Daniel King, James Lee. Tumor-informed ctDNA, ddPCR, CA19-9, and CEA to evaluate early treatment dynamics in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Advances in Pancreatic Cancer Research—Emerging Science Driving Transformative Solutions; Boston, MA; 2025 Sep 28-Oct 1; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(18_Suppl_3): nr A126.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer research
Cancer research 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
16.10
自引率
0.90%
发文量
7677
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: Cancer Research, published by the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), is a journal that focuses on impactful original studies, reviews, and opinion pieces relevant to the broad cancer research community. Manuscripts that present conceptual or technological advances leading to insights into cancer biology are particularly sought after. The journal also places emphasis on convergence science, which involves bridging multiple distinct areas of cancer research. With primary subsections including Cancer Biology, Cancer Immunology, Cancer Metabolism and Molecular Mechanisms, Translational Cancer Biology, Cancer Landscapes, and Convergence Science, Cancer Research has a comprehensive scope. It is published twice a month and has one volume per year, with a print ISSN of 0008-5472 and an online ISSN of 1538-7445. Cancer Research is abstracted and/or indexed in various databases and platforms, including BIOSIS Previews (R) Database, MEDLINE, Current Contents/Life Sciences, Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, Science Citation Index, Scopus, and Web of Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信