心房颤动患者复发风险的认知:一项定性研究。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Yunxia Li,Jing Lu,Zhanhong You,Xiu Tao,Fan Wu,Yue Zhu,Xiaoran Chen,Guozhen Sun
{"title":"心房颤动患者复发风险的认知:一项定性研究。","authors":"Yunxia Li,Jing Lu,Zhanhong You,Xiu Tao,Fan Wu,Yue Zhu,Xiaoran Chen,Guozhen Sun","doi":"10.1111/jan.70258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AIMS\r\nThe study aims to investigate patients' perceptions of recurrence risk associated with atrial fibrillation, with the goal of establishing a theoretical foundation for developing future measurement scale and intervention strategies.\r\n\r\nDESIGN\r\nA qualitative interview study.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nSeventeen patients diagnosed with atrial fibrillation at a Grade-A tertiary hospital participated in semi-structured, in-depth interviews conducted between October and December 2024. Participants were selected via purposive sampling. The data were analysed employing thematic analysis in accordance with Colaizzi's method. The study adhered to the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research checklist.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nThe perceptions of recurrence risk among patients with atrial fibrillation can be summarised into five themes: (1) perceived likelihood of recurrence, (2) perceived severity of recurrence, (3) perceived triggers of recurrence, (4) emotional reaction to recurrence, and (5) efficacy perception of managing recurrence risk.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nPerceptions of recurrence risk among patients with atrial fibrillation are diverse and often underestimated due to limited knowledge and subjective symptom interpretation, affecting health behaviours. Understanding patients' subjective appraisals, emotions, and perceived efficacy is essential. Validated assessment tools and tailored risk communication may enhance self-management and support targeted interventions.\r\n\r\nIMPACT\r\nThis study provides critical insights into how atrial fibrillation patients perceive their risk of recurrence. It also provides a theoretical foundation for creating validated assessment tools and tailoring individualised health education and intervention programmes.\r\n\r\nPATIENT CONTRIBUTION\r\nPatients were involved in the study design, data collection, and interpretation of findings. Their contributions included providing feedback on the initial interview guide to ensure relevance and clarity, participating in in-depth interviews to share their lived experiences with atrial fibrillation recurrence, and offering reflections on key themes emerging from the data.","PeriodicalId":54897,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceptions of Recurrence Risk Among Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Qualitative Study.\",\"authors\":\"Yunxia Li,Jing Lu,Zhanhong You,Xiu Tao,Fan Wu,Yue Zhu,Xiaoran Chen,Guozhen Sun\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jan.70258\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AIMS\\r\\nThe study aims to investigate patients' perceptions of recurrence risk associated with atrial fibrillation, with the goal of establishing a theoretical foundation for developing future measurement scale and intervention strategies.\\r\\n\\r\\nDESIGN\\r\\nA qualitative interview study.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nSeventeen patients diagnosed with atrial fibrillation at a Grade-A tertiary hospital participated in semi-structured, in-depth interviews conducted between October and December 2024. Participants were selected via purposive sampling. The data were analysed employing thematic analysis in accordance with Colaizzi's method. The study adhered to the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research checklist.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nThe perceptions of recurrence risk among patients with atrial fibrillation can be summarised into five themes: (1) perceived likelihood of recurrence, (2) perceived severity of recurrence, (3) perceived triggers of recurrence, (4) emotional reaction to recurrence, and (5) efficacy perception of managing recurrence risk.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSION\\r\\nPerceptions of recurrence risk among patients with atrial fibrillation are diverse and often underestimated due to limited knowledge and subjective symptom interpretation, affecting health behaviours. Understanding patients' subjective appraisals, emotions, and perceived efficacy is essential. Validated assessment tools and tailored risk communication may enhance self-management and support targeted interventions.\\r\\n\\r\\nIMPACT\\r\\nThis study provides critical insights into how atrial fibrillation patients perceive their risk of recurrence. It also provides a theoretical foundation for creating validated assessment tools and tailoring individualised health education and intervention programmes.\\r\\n\\r\\nPATIENT CONTRIBUTION\\r\\nPatients were involved in the study design, data collection, and interpretation of findings. Their contributions included providing feedback on the initial interview guide to ensure relevance and clarity, participating in in-depth interviews to share their lived experiences with atrial fibrillation recurrence, and offering reflections on key themes emerging from the data.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54897,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Advanced Nursing\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Advanced Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.70258\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.70258","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本研究旨在了解患者对房颤复发风险的认知,为制定未来的测量量表和干预策略奠定理论基础。设计定性访谈研究。方法对某三级甲等医院诊断为房颤的17例患者于2024年10月至12月进行半结构化深度访谈。参与者是通过有目的的抽样选择的。根据Colaizzi的方法,采用主题分析法对数据进行分析。本研究遵循定性研究报告综合标准检查表。结果心房颤动患者对复发风险的感知可归纳为5个主题:(1)感知复发的可能性;(2)感知复发的严重程度;(3)感知复发的触发因素;(4)感知复发的情绪反应;(5)感知控制复发风险的有效性。结论房颤患者对房颤复发风险的认知存在差异,由于知识和主观症状解释的限制,往往被低估,影响了健康行为。了解患者的主观评价、情绪和感知疗效是必不可少的。经过验证的评估工具和量身定制的风险沟通可以加强自我管理并支持有针对性的干预措施。影响:这项研究为房颤患者如何感知其复发风险提供了重要的见解。它还为创建有效的评估工具和定制个性化健康教育和干预方案提供了理论基础。患者参与了研究设计、数据收集和结果解释。他们的贡献包括对初步访谈指南提供反馈以确保相关性和清晰度,参与深度访谈以分享他们与房颤复发的生活经验,并对数据中出现的关键主题提供反思。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perceptions of Recurrence Risk Among Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Qualitative Study.
AIMS The study aims to investigate patients' perceptions of recurrence risk associated with atrial fibrillation, with the goal of establishing a theoretical foundation for developing future measurement scale and intervention strategies. DESIGN A qualitative interview study. METHODS Seventeen patients diagnosed with atrial fibrillation at a Grade-A tertiary hospital participated in semi-structured, in-depth interviews conducted between October and December 2024. Participants were selected via purposive sampling. The data were analysed employing thematic analysis in accordance with Colaizzi's method. The study adhered to the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research checklist. RESULTS The perceptions of recurrence risk among patients with atrial fibrillation can be summarised into five themes: (1) perceived likelihood of recurrence, (2) perceived severity of recurrence, (3) perceived triggers of recurrence, (4) emotional reaction to recurrence, and (5) efficacy perception of managing recurrence risk. CONCLUSION Perceptions of recurrence risk among patients with atrial fibrillation are diverse and often underestimated due to limited knowledge and subjective symptom interpretation, affecting health behaviours. Understanding patients' subjective appraisals, emotions, and perceived efficacy is essential. Validated assessment tools and tailored risk communication may enhance self-management and support targeted interventions. IMPACT This study provides critical insights into how atrial fibrillation patients perceive their risk of recurrence. It also provides a theoretical foundation for creating validated assessment tools and tailoring individualised health education and intervention programmes. PATIENT CONTRIBUTION Patients were involved in the study design, data collection, and interpretation of findings. Their contributions included providing feedback on the initial interview guide to ensure relevance and clarity, participating in in-depth interviews to share their lived experiences with atrial fibrillation recurrence, and offering reflections on key themes emerging from the data.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.90%
发文量
369
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Advanced Nursing (JAN) contributes to the advancement of evidence-based nursing, midwifery and healthcare by disseminating high quality research and scholarship of contemporary relevance and with potential to advance knowledge for practice, education, management or policy. All JAN papers are required to have a sound scientific, evidential, theoretical or philosophical base and to be critical, questioning and scholarly in approach. As an international journal, JAN promotes diversity of research and scholarship in terms of culture, paradigm and healthcare context. For JAN’s worldwide readership, authors are expected to make clear the wider international relevance of their work and to demonstrate sensitivity to cultural considerations and differences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信