医疗保健专业人员、患者和家属对围手术期常规药物管理的看法:一项探索性质的研究。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Atefeh Mehrabifar,Elizabeth Manias,Thomas E Poulton,Bernhard Riedel,Janelle Penno,Patricia Nicholson
{"title":"医疗保健专业人员、患者和家属对围手术期常规药物管理的看法:一项探索性质的研究。","authors":"Atefeh Mehrabifar,Elizabeth Manias,Thomas E Poulton,Bernhard Riedel,Janelle Penno,Patricia Nicholson","doi":"10.1111/jan.70248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AIM\r\nTo explore healthcare professionals', patients', and family members' experiences of managing regular medications across the perioperative pathway in a specialist cancer hospital in Melbourne.\r\n\r\nDESIGN\r\nAn exploratory qualitative study using a descriptive-interpretive approach.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nInterviews were conducted with 11 patients and seven family members, and focus groups with 10 anaesthetists, seven surgeons, four nurses, and 10 pharmacists (N = 49) between October 2024 and April 2025. Transcripts were analysed using Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic approach and mapped into the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) 2.0 human factors framework.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nThree interrelated themes were constructed: (1) Work system elements shaping perioperative medication management, encompassing medication and surgical contexts, documentation gaps, reliable medication information, communication infrastructures, roles and responsibilities, and perioperative area resources; (2) Processes influencing medication management practice, characterised by continuity of care at transition points and flagging processes, interdisciplinary collaboration and role interpretation in medication management, patient involvement, family member involvement, and healthcare professional perspectives; and (3) Outcomes of medication management, including patient and organisational outcomes, such as workflow inefficiencies, procedure cancellations, and unplanned readmissions.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nFindings indicated that addressing the complexity of perioperative medication safety demands coordinated contributions across multiple professional disciplines. Strengthening interdisciplinary collaboration, clarifying shared responsibilities, embedding structured reconciliation processes at transitions of care, standardizing communication protocols, and involving patients and families are all critical strategies.\r\n\r\nIMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE\r\nThis study highlights the need for interdisciplinary coordination and clear role definitions, with nurses as the key contributor, to support collaborative medication decisions in perioperative cancer care.\r\n\r\nIMPACT\r\nThis study explored challenges in managing regular medications during cancer surgery, offering insights to guide safer practices for perioperative teams, patients, and families in cancer care settings.\r\n\r\nREPORTING METHOD\r\nCOREQ (Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research) guidelines.\r\n\r\nPATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION\r\nNone.","PeriodicalId":54897,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perspectives of Healthcare Professionals, Patients and Family Members on Managing Regular Medications Across the Perioperative Pathway: An Exploratory Qualitative Study.\",\"authors\":\"Atefeh Mehrabifar,Elizabeth Manias,Thomas E Poulton,Bernhard Riedel,Janelle Penno,Patricia Nicholson\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jan.70248\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AIM\\r\\nTo explore healthcare professionals', patients', and family members' experiences of managing regular medications across the perioperative pathway in a specialist cancer hospital in Melbourne.\\r\\n\\r\\nDESIGN\\r\\nAn exploratory qualitative study using a descriptive-interpretive approach.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nInterviews were conducted with 11 patients and seven family members, and focus groups with 10 anaesthetists, seven surgeons, four nurses, and 10 pharmacists (N = 49) between October 2024 and April 2025. Transcripts were analysed using Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic approach and mapped into the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) 2.0 human factors framework.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nThree interrelated themes were constructed: (1) Work system elements shaping perioperative medication management, encompassing medication and surgical contexts, documentation gaps, reliable medication information, communication infrastructures, roles and responsibilities, and perioperative area resources; (2) Processes influencing medication management practice, characterised by continuity of care at transition points and flagging processes, interdisciplinary collaboration and role interpretation in medication management, patient involvement, family member involvement, and healthcare professional perspectives; and (3) Outcomes of medication management, including patient and organisational outcomes, such as workflow inefficiencies, procedure cancellations, and unplanned readmissions.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSION\\r\\nFindings indicated that addressing the complexity of perioperative medication safety demands coordinated contributions across multiple professional disciplines. Strengthening interdisciplinary collaboration, clarifying shared responsibilities, embedding structured reconciliation processes at transitions of care, standardizing communication protocols, and involving patients and families are all critical strategies.\\r\\n\\r\\nIMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE\\r\\nThis study highlights the need for interdisciplinary coordination and clear role definitions, with nurses as the key contributor, to support collaborative medication decisions in perioperative cancer care.\\r\\n\\r\\nIMPACT\\r\\nThis study explored challenges in managing regular medications during cancer surgery, offering insights to guide safer practices for perioperative teams, patients, and families in cancer care settings.\\r\\n\\r\\nREPORTING METHOD\\r\\nCOREQ (Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research) guidelines.\\r\\n\\r\\nPATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION\\r\\nNone.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54897,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Advanced Nursing\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Advanced Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.70248\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.70248","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨墨尔本一家癌症专科医院的医护人员、患者和家属在围手术期常规用药管理方面的经验。设计一项采用描述性-解释性方法的探索性定性研究。方法于2024年10月至2025年4月对11名患者和7名家属进行访谈,并对10名麻醉师、7名外科医生、4名护士和10名药剂师(N = 49)进行焦点小组访谈。使用Braun和Clarke的反思性主题方法分析转录本,并将其映射到患者安全系统工程倡议(SEIPS) 2.0人为因素框架中。结果构建了三个相互关联的主题:(1)影响围手术期用药管理的工作系统要素,包括用药和手术环境、文献缺口、可靠用药信息、沟通基础设施、角色和职责以及围手术期区域资源;(2)影响药物管理实践的过程,其特征是在过渡点和标记过程的护理连续性,药物管理中的跨学科合作和角色解释,患者参与,家庭成员参与和医疗保健专业观点;(3)药物管理的结果,包括患者和组织的结果,如工作流程效率低下、程序取消和计划外再入院。结论:解决围手术期用药安全的复杂性需要多学科的协同贡献。加强跨学科合作、明确共同责任、在护理过渡阶段嵌入有组织的和解过程、使沟通协议标准化以及让患者和家属参与进来都是至关重要的战略。对专业和/或患者护理的启示本研究强调了跨学科协调和明确角色定义的必要性,护士作为关键贡献者,支持围手术期癌症护理的协同用药决策。影响本研究探讨了在癌症手术期间管理常规药物的挑战,为癌症护理机构的围手术期团队、患者和家庭提供更安全的实践指导。报告方法coreq(定性研究报告综合标准)指南。病人或公众捐款无。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perspectives of Healthcare Professionals, Patients and Family Members on Managing Regular Medications Across the Perioperative Pathway: An Exploratory Qualitative Study.
AIM To explore healthcare professionals', patients', and family members' experiences of managing regular medications across the perioperative pathway in a specialist cancer hospital in Melbourne. DESIGN An exploratory qualitative study using a descriptive-interpretive approach. METHODS Interviews were conducted with 11 patients and seven family members, and focus groups with 10 anaesthetists, seven surgeons, four nurses, and 10 pharmacists (N = 49) between October 2024 and April 2025. Transcripts were analysed using Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic approach and mapped into the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) 2.0 human factors framework. RESULTS Three interrelated themes were constructed: (1) Work system elements shaping perioperative medication management, encompassing medication and surgical contexts, documentation gaps, reliable medication information, communication infrastructures, roles and responsibilities, and perioperative area resources; (2) Processes influencing medication management practice, characterised by continuity of care at transition points and flagging processes, interdisciplinary collaboration and role interpretation in medication management, patient involvement, family member involvement, and healthcare professional perspectives; and (3) Outcomes of medication management, including patient and organisational outcomes, such as workflow inefficiencies, procedure cancellations, and unplanned readmissions. CONCLUSION Findings indicated that addressing the complexity of perioperative medication safety demands coordinated contributions across multiple professional disciplines. Strengthening interdisciplinary collaboration, clarifying shared responsibilities, embedding structured reconciliation processes at transitions of care, standardizing communication protocols, and involving patients and families are all critical strategies. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE This study highlights the need for interdisciplinary coordination and clear role definitions, with nurses as the key contributor, to support collaborative medication decisions in perioperative cancer care. IMPACT This study explored challenges in managing regular medications during cancer surgery, offering insights to guide safer practices for perioperative teams, patients, and families in cancer care settings. REPORTING METHOD COREQ (Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research) guidelines. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION None.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.90%
发文量
369
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Advanced Nursing (JAN) contributes to the advancement of evidence-based nursing, midwifery and healthcare by disseminating high quality research and scholarship of contemporary relevance and with potential to advance knowledge for practice, education, management or policy. All JAN papers are required to have a sound scientific, evidential, theoretical or philosophical base and to be critical, questioning and scholarly in approach. As an international journal, JAN promotes diversity of research and scholarship in terms of culture, paradigm and healthcare context. For JAN’s worldwide readership, authors are expected to make clear the wider international relevance of their work and to demonstrate sensitivity to cultural considerations and differences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信