手术先入路与传统正颌手术治疗下颌前突患者的横向失代偿。

IF 3.2
KyungMin Clara Lee, Huiming Xu, Hyun-Ju Jeon
{"title":"手术先入路与传统正颌手术治疗下颌前突患者的横向失代偿。","authors":"KyungMin Clara Lee, Huiming Xu, Hyun-Ju Jeon","doi":"10.2319/120724-1003.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate transverse treatment outcomes in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion treated with a surgery-first orthognathic approach (SFA) vs conventional orthognathic surgery (COS).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included 128 patients, divided into four groups of 32 based on the inclusion of presurgical treatment and extraction of the maxillary premolars: (1) COS with extraction, (2) COS without extraction, (3) SFA with extraction, and (4) SFA without extraction. CBCT scans were taken before and after treatment, with an additional scan after presurgical orthodontic treatment for the COS group only. The primary outcome variable was transverse decompensation, assessed through changes in maxillary and mandibular molar inclination and intermolar width. Predictor variables included treatment approach (SFA vs COS) and extraction status (extraction vs nonextraction). Transverse measurements were compared among the four groups throughout the treatment process.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Maxillary molar inclination relative to the occlusal plane increased after treatment, whereas the mandibular molar inclination decreased after treatment, indicating transverse decompensation in the COS and SFA groups, and the extraction and nonextraction groups. There were no statistically significant differences in transverse changes between the COS and SFA groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although the difference in transverse decompensation between the COS and SFA groups was not statistically significant, clinicians may still need to consider careful management of transverse decompensation during postsurgical treatment, particularly in SFA cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":94224,"journal":{"name":"The Angle orthodontist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transverse decompensation in surgery-first approach vs conventional orthognathic surgery in mandibular prognathism patients.\",\"authors\":\"KyungMin Clara Lee, Huiming Xu, Hyun-Ju Jeon\",\"doi\":\"10.2319/120724-1003.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate transverse treatment outcomes in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion treated with a surgery-first orthognathic approach (SFA) vs conventional orthognathic surgery (COS).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included 128 patients, divided into four groups of 32 based on the inclusion of presurgical treatment and extraction of the maxillary premolars: (1) COS with extraction, (2) COS without extraction, (3) SFA with extraction, and (4) SFA without extraction. CBCT scans were taken before and after treatment, with an additional scan after presurgical orthodontic treatment for the COS group only. The primary outcome variable was transverse decompensation, assessed through changes in maxillary and mandibular molar inclination and intermolar width. Predictor variables included treatment approach (SFA vs COS) and extraction status (extraction vs nonextraction). Transverse measurements were compared among the four groups throughout the treatment process.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Maxillary molar inclination relative to the occlusal plane increased after treatment, whereas the mandibular molar inclination decreased after treatment, indicating transverse decompensation in the COS and SFA groups, and the extraction and nonextraction groups. There were no statistically significant differences in transverse changes between the COS and SFA groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although the difference in transverse decompensation between the COS and SFA groups was not statistically significant, clinicians may still need to consider careful management of transverse decompensation during postsurgical treatment, particularly in SFA cases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94224,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Angle orthodontist\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Angle orthodontist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2319/120724-1003.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Angle orthodontist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2319/120724-1003.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较手术前正颌入路(SFA)与传统正颌手术(COS)治疗骨骼III类错的横向治疗效果。材料与方法:本回顾性队列研究纳入128例患者,根据上颌前磨牙术前处理及拔牙情况分为4组,每组32例:(1)有拔牙的COS组,(2)不拔牙的COS组,(3)有拔牙的SFA组,(4)不拔牙的SFA组。治疗前后分别进行CBCT扫描,仅COS组在术前正畸治疗后进行额外扫描。主要结局变量是横向失代偿,通过上颌和下颌磨牙倾斜度和磨牙间宽度的变化来评估。预测变量包括处理方法(SFA vs COS)和提取状态(提取vs非提取)。比较四组在整个治疗过程中的横向测量值。结果:治疗后上颌磨牙相对于咬合平面的倾斜度增大,治疗后下颌磨牙倾斜度减小,表明COS组和SFA组以及拔牙组和未拔牙组均存在横向失代偿。COS组和SFA组的横切面变化无统计学差异。结论:尽管COS组和SFA组之间的横向失代偿差异无统计学意义,但临床医生仍需考虑在术后治疗中谨慎处理横向失代偿,特别是SFA病例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Transverse decompensation in surgery-first approach vs conventional orthognathic surgery in mandibular prognathism patients.

Objectives: To investigate transverse treatment outcomes in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion treated with a surgery-first orthognathic approach (SFA) vs conventional orthognathic surgery (COS).

Materials and methods: This retrospective cohort study included 128 patients, divided into four groups of 32 based on the inclusion of presurgical treatment and extraction of the maxillary premolars: (1) COS with extraction, (2) COS without extraction, (3) SFA with extraction, and (4) SFA without extraction. CBCT scans were taken before and after treatment, with an additional scan after presurgical orthodontic treatment for the COS group only. The primary outcome variable was transverse decompensation, assessed through changes in maxillary and mandibular molar inclination and intermolar width. Predictor variables included treatment approach (SFA vs COS) and extraction status (extraction vs nonextraction). Transverse measurements were compared among the four groups throughout the treatment process.

Results: Maxillary molar inclination relative to the occlusal plane increased after treatment, whereas the mandibular molar inclination decreased after treatment, indicating transverse decompensation in the COS and SFA groups, and the extraction and nonextraction groups. There were no statistically significant differences in transverse changes between the COS and SFA groups.

Conclusions: Although the difference in transverse decompensation between the COS and SFA groups was not statistically significant, clinicians may still need to consider careful management of transverse decompensation during postsurgical treatment, particularly in SFA cases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信