术后HDR近距离治疗难治性瘢痕疙瘩:一项中位随访89个月的回顾性研究。

IF 1.8
Matthias Grobien, Laurent Quero, Marc Chaouat, Guillaume Mulier, Gabriel Thiriez, Kevin Serror, David Boccara
{"title":"术后HDR近距离治疗难治性瘢痕疙瘩:一项中位随访89个月的回顾性研究。","authors":"Matthias Grobien, Laurent Quero, Marc Chaouat, Guillaume Mulier, Gabriel Thiriez, Kevin Serror, David Boccara","doi":"10.1016/j.brachy.2025.08.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Between 2009 and 2022, a homogenous cohort of patients at Saint-Louis hospital affected by keloid scars undergone excision surgery followed by HDR brachytherapy on the same day.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the percentage of long-term recurrence and look for the presence of influencing factors.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Inclusion criteria included the presence of one or more keloid scars and histological confirmation of the diagnosis. Exclusion criteria comprised a history of keloid surgery other than simple excision, and the absence of intraoperative direct suturing of the scar.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 87 keloids scare were eligible for the analysis. Median follow-up was 89,7 months (IQR: 60.2-120.2). 34 recurrences (39%) were observed. Of these recurrences, 41% (14 of 34) showed a significant reduction in keloid volume, 29% (10 of 34) returned to the original keloid volume, and 29% (10 of 34) demonstrated an increase in volume. The recurrence-free survival for all cheloid was 0.89 [0.45;0.98] at one year and 0.67 [0.28;0.89] at 5 years. Keloid of the ear compared to other sites (HR = 0.38, 95% CI: 0.17-0.85, p = 0.02) was significantly associated with a lower recurrence risk. Male sex (HR = 2.13, 95% CI: 0.88-5.14, p = 0.09) and prior treatment (HR = 3.44, 95% CI: 0.85-13.89, p = 0.08) were associated with an increased recurrence risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>With a prolonged follow-up and a rigorous methodology compared to previous studies, our results lead us to preferentially recommend postoperative brachytherapy for keloid located in the ears, especially for women without any previous treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":93914,"journal":{"name":"Brachytherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treatment of refractory keloid by postoperative HDR brachytherapy: An 89-month median follow-up retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Matthias Grobien, Laurent Quero, Marc Chaouat, Guillaume Mulier, Gabriel Thiriez, Kevin Serror, David Boccara\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.brachy.2025.08.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Between 2009 and 2022, a homogenous cohort of patients at Saint-Louis hospital affected by keloid scars undergone excision surgery followed by HDR brachytherapy on the same day.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the percentage of long-term recurrence and look for the presence of influencing factors.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Inclusion criteria included the presence of one or more keloid scars and histological confirmation of the diagnosis. Exclusion criteria comprised a history of keloid surgery other than simple excision, and the absence of intraoperative direct suturing of the scar.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 87 keloids scare were eligible for the analysis. Median follow-up was 89,7 months (IQR: 60.2-120.2). 34 recurrences (39%) were observed. Of these recurrences, 41% (14 of 34) showed a significant reduction in keloid volume, 29% (10 of 34) returned to the original keloid volume, and 29% (10 of 34) demonstrated an increase in volume. The recurrence-free survival for all cheloid was 0.89 [0.45;0.98] at one year and 0.67 [0.28;0.89] at 5 years. Keloid of the ear compared to other sites (HR = 0.38, 95% CI: 0.17-0.85, p = 0.02) was significantly associated with a lower recurrence risk. Male sex (HR = 2.13, 95% CI: 0.88-5.14, p = 0.09) and prior treatment (HR = 3.44, 95% CI: 0.85-13.89, p = 0.08) were associated with an increased recurrence risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>With a prolonged follow-up and a rigorous methodology compared to previous studies, our results lead us to preferentially recommend postoperative brachytherapy for keloid located in the ears, especially for women without any previous treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93914,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brachytherapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brachytherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2025.08.003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brachytherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2025.08.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:2009年至2022年期间,圣路易斯医院一组同质队列的瘢痕疙瘩疤痕患者在同一天接受了切除手术,随后接受了HDR近距离放疗。目的:评估长期复发率,寻找影响因素的存在。材料和方法:纳入标准包括一个或多个瘢痕疙瘩的存在和组织学诊断的证实。排除标准包括除单纯切除外的瘢痕疙瘩手术史,以及术中没有直接缝合疤痕。结果:87例瘢痕疙瘩符合分析条件。中位随访89.7个月(IQR: 60.2 ~ 120.2)。34例复发(39%)。在这些复发病例中,41%(14 / 34)瘢痕疙瘩体积明显减小,29%(10 / 34)瘢痕疙瘩体积恢复到原来的大小,29%(10 / 34)瘢痕疙瘩体积增大。1年无复发生存率为0.89[0.45;0.98],5年无复发生存率为0.67[0.28;0.89]。耳部瘢痕瘤与其他部位相比(HR = 0.38,95% CI: 0.17-0.85, p = 0.02)与较低的复发风险显著相关。男性(HR = 2.13,95% CI: 0.88-5.14, p = 0.09)和既往治疗(HR = 3.44,95% CI: 0.85-13.89, p = 0.08)与复发风险增加相关。结论:与以往的研究相比,我们的研究结果延长了随访时间,并采用了严格的方法,因此我们优先推荐耳内瘢痕瘤的术后近距离治疗,特别是对于之前没有接受过任何治疗的女性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Treatment of refractory keloid by postoperative HDR brachytherapy: An 89-month median follow-up retrospective study.

Background: Between 2009 and 2022, a homogenous cohort of patients at Saint-Louis hospital affected by keloid scars undergone excision surgery followed by HDR brachytherapy on the same day.

Purpose: To assess the percentage of long-term recurrence and look for the presence of influencing factors.

Materials and methods: Inclusion criteria included the presence of one or more keloid scars and histological confirmation of the diagnosis. Exclusion criteria comprised a history of keloid surgery other than simple excision, and the absence of intraoperative direct suturing of the scar.

Results: A total of 87 keloids scare were eligible for the analysis. Median follow-up was 89,7 months (IQR: 60.2-120.2). 34 recurrences (39%) were observed. Of these recurrences, 41% (14 of 34) showed a significant reduction in keloid volume, 29% (10 of 34) returned to the original keloid volume, and 29% (10 of 34) demonstrated an increase in volume. The recurrence-free survival for all cheloid was 0.89 [0.45;0.98] at one year and 0.67 [0.28;0.89] at 5 years. Keloid of the ear compared to other sites (HR = 0.38, 95% CI: 0.17-0.85, p = 0.02) was significantly associated with a lower recurrence risk. Male sex (HR = 2.13, 95% CI: 0.88-5.14, p = 0.09) and prior treatment (HR = 3.44, 95% CI: 0.85-13.89, p = 0.08) were associated with an increased recurrence risk.

Conclusion: With a prolonged follow-up and a rigorous methodology compared to previous studies, our results lead us to preferentially recommend postoperative brachytherapy for keloid located in the ears, especially for women without any previous treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信