Matthias Grobien, Laurent Quero, Marc Chaouat, Guillaume Mulier, Gabriel Thiriez, Kevin Serror, David Boccara
{"title":"术后HDR近距离治疗难治性瘢痕疙瘩:一项中位随访89个月的回顾性研究。","authors":"Matthias Grobien, Laurent Quero, Marc Chaouat, Guillaume Mulier, Gabriel Thiriez, Kevin Serror, David Boccara","doi":"10.1016/j.brachy.2025.08.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Between 2009 and 2022, a homogenous cohort of patients at Saint-Louis hospital affected by keloid scars undergone excision surgery followed by HDR brachytherapy on the same day.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the percentage of long-term recurrence and look for the presence of influencing factors.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Inclusion criteria included the presence of one or more keloid scars and histological confirmation of the diagnosis. Exclusion criteria comprised a history of keloid surgery other than simple excision, and the absence of intraoperative direct suturing of the scar.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 87 keloids scare were eligible for the analysis. Median follow-up was 89,7 months (IQR: 60.2-120.2). 34 recurrences (39%) were observed. Of these recurrences, 41% (14 of 34) showed a significant reduction in keloid volume, 29% (10 of 34) returned to the original keloid volume, and 29% (10 of 34) demonstrated an increase in volume. The recurrence-free survival for all cheloid was 0.89 [0.45;0.98] at one year and 0.67 [0.28;0.89] at 5 years. Keloid of the ear compared to other sites (HR = 0.38, 95% CI: 0.17-0.85, p = 0.02) was significantly associated with a lower recurrence risk. Male sex (HR = 2.13, 95% CI: 0.88-5.14, p = 0.09) and prior treatment (HR = 3.44, 95% CI: 0.85-13.89, p = 0.08) were associated with an increased recurrence risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>With a prolonged follow-up and a rigorous methodology compared to previous studies, our results lead us to preferentially recommend postoperative brachytherapy for keloid located in the ears, especially for women without any previous treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":93914,"journal":{"name":"Brachytherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treatment of refractory keloid by postoperative HDR brachytherapy: An 89-month median follow-up retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Matthias Grobien, Laurent Quero, Marc Chaouat, Guillaume Mulier, Gabriel Thiriez, Kevin Serror, David Boccara\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.brachy.2025.08.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Between 2009 and 2022, a homogenous cohort of patients at Saint-Louis hospital affected by keloid scars undergone excision surgery followed by HDR brachytherapy on the same day.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the percentage of long-term recurrence and look for the presence of influencing factors.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Inclusion criteria included the presence of one or more keloid scars and histological confirmation of the diagnosis. Exclusion criteria comprised a history of keloid surgery other than simple excision, and the absence of intraoperative direct suturing of the scar.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 87 keloids scare were eligible for the analysis. Median follow-up was 89,7 months (IQR: 60.2-120.2). 34 recurrences (39%) were observed. Of these recurrences, 41% (14 of 34) showed a significant reduction in keloid volume, 29% (10 of 34) returned to the original keloid volume, and 29% (10 of 34) demonstrated an increase in volume. The recurrence-free survival for all cheloid was 0.89 [0.45;0.98] at one year and 0.67 [0.28;0.89] at 5 years. Keloid of the ear compared to other sites (HR = 0.38, 95% CI: 0.17-0.85, p = 0.02) was significantly associated with a lower recurrence risk. Male sex (HR = 2.13, 95% CI: 0.88-5.14, p = 0.09) and prior treatment (HR = 3.44, 95% CI: 0.85-13.89, p = 0.08) were associated with an increased recurrence risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>With a prolonged follow-up and a rigorous methodology compared to previous studies, our results lead us to preferentially recommend postoperative brachytherapy for keloid located in the ears, especially for women without any previous treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93914,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brachytherapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brachytherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2025.08.003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brachytherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2025.08.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Treatment of refractory keloid by postoperative HDR brachytherapy: An 89-month median follow-up retrospective study.
Background: Between 2009 and 2022, a homogenous cohort of patients at Saint-Louis hospital affected by keloid scars undergone excision surgery followed by HDR brachytherapy on the same day.
Purpose: To assess the percentage of long-term recurrence and look for the presence of influencing factors.
Materials and methods: Inclusion criteria included the presence of one or more keloid scars and histological confirmation of the diagnosis. Exclusion criteria comprised a history of keloid surgery other than simple excision, and the absence of intraoperative direct suturing of the scar.
Results: A total of 87 keloids scare were eligible for the analysis. Median follow-up was 89,7 months (IQR: 60.2-120.2). 34 recurrences (39%) were observed. Of these recurrences, 41% (14 of 34) showed a significant reduction in keloid volume, 29% (10 of 34) returned to the original keloid volume, and 29% (10 of 34) demonstrated an increase in volume. The recurrence-free survival for all cheloid was 0.89 [0.45;0.98] at one year and 0.67 [0.28;0.89] at 5 years. Keloid of the ear compared to other sites (HR = 0.38, 95% CI: 0.17-0.85, p = 0.02) was significantly associated with a lower recurrence risk. Male sex (HR = 2.13, 95% CI: 0.88-5.14, p = 0.09) and prior treatment (HR = 3.44, 95% CI: 0.85-13.89, p = 0.08) were associated with an increased recurrence risk.
Conclusion: With a prolonged follow-up and a rigorous methodology compared to previous studies, our results lead us to preferentially recommend postoperative brachytherapy for keloid located in the ears, especially for women without any previous treatment.