C.R. Kirman , J.S. Bus , S. Gupta , J.E. Klaunig , M.E. Meek , S.M. Hays
{"title":"专家小组对1,4-二恶烷的肿瘤作用方式及其对人类风险评估的影响的评估。","authors":"C.R. Kirman , J.S. Bus , S. Gupta , J.E. Klaunig , M.E. Meek , S.M. Hays","doi":"10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105950","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Mode of action (MOA) plays an important role in key decisions made in risk assessments, including that for low-dose extrapolation. To support MOA-dependent decisions for 1,4-dioxane (1,4-DX), an independent panel of topic experts evaluated the available evidence on the MOA and human relevance of 1,4-DX tumors reported in rodent studies. The panel considered MOA data on liver tumors in rodents, as well as for other tissue sites (nasal cavity, peritoneal mesothelioma). For liver tumors, the panelists found strongest support for an indirect genotoxic MOA involving metabolic saturation of the enzyme that metabolizes 1,4-DX (CYP2E1), followed by induction of CYP2E1, oxidative stress, cytotoxicity, and regenerative proliferation. Metabolic saturation was identified as an early key event. Although available evidence for nasal and peritoneal tumors was limited, similar non-genotoxic MOAs were considered plausible. For all three tumor types, confidence ratings (scale of −5 to +5) from the panel for the best supported MOAs (+2.5 to +3.3) were significantly higher than the confidence rating for a direct genotoxic MOA (−3.8 to −4.5). The conclusions from this independent panel, which included careful consideration of recently published studies, provide support for use of non-linear extrapolation methods in human health risk assessment for 1,4-DX rodent tumors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20852,"journal":{"name":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","volume":"164 ","pages":"Article 105950"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Expert panel evaluation of the tumor modes of action for 1,4-dioxane and their implications for human risk assessment\",\"authors\":\"C.R. Kirman , J.S. Bus , S. Gupta , J.E. Klaunig , M.E. Meek , S.M. Hays\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105950\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Mode of action (MOA) plays an important role in key decisions made in risk assessments, including that for low-dose extrapolation. To support MOA-dependent decisions for 1,4-dioxane (1,4-DX), an independent panel of topic experts evaluated the available evidence on the MOA and human relevance of 1,4-DX tumors reported in rodent studies. The panel considered MOA data on liver tumors in rodents, as well as for other tissue sites (nasal cavity, peritoneal mesothelioma). For liver tumors, the panelists found strongest support for an indirect genotoxic MOA involving metabolic saturation of the enzyme that metabolizes 1,4-DX (CYP2E1), followed by induction of CYP2E1, oxidative stress, cytotoxicity, and regenerative proliferation. Metabolic saturation was identified as an early key event. Although available evidence for nasal and peritoneal tumors was limited, similar non-genotoxic MOAs were considered plausible. For all three tumor types, confidence ratings (scale of −5 to +5) from the panel for the best supported MOAs (+2.5 to +3.3) were significantly higher than the confidence rating for a direct genotoxic MOA (−3.8 to −4.5). The conclusions from this independent panel, which included careful consideration of recently published studies, provide support for use of non-linear extrapolation methods in human health risk assessment for 1,4-DX rodent tumors.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20852,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"164 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105950\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273230025001825\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, LEGAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273230025001825","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Expert panel evaluation of the tumor modes of action for 1,4-dioxane and their implications for human risk assessment
Mode of action (MOA) plays an important role in key decisions made in risk assessments, including that for low-dose extrapolation. To support MOA-dependent decisions for 1,4-dioxane (1,4-DX), an independent panel of topic experts evaluated the available evidence on the MOA and human relevance of 1,4-DX tumors reported in rodent studies. The panel considered MOA data on liver tumors in rodents, as well as for other tissue sites (nasal cavity, peritoneal mesothelioma). For liver tumors, the panelists found strongest support for an indirect genotoxic MOA involving metabolic saturation of the enzyme that metabolizes 1,4-DX (CYP2E1), followed by induction of CYP2E1, oxidative stress, cytotoxicity, and regenerative proliferation. Metabolic saturation was identified as an early key event. Although available evidence for nasal and peritoneal tumors was limited, similar non-genotoxic MOAs were considered plausible. For all three tumor types, confidence ratings (scale of −5 to +5) from the panel for the best supported MOAs (+2.5 to +3.3) were significantly higher than the confidence rating for a direct genotoxic MOA (−3.8 to −4.5). The conclusions from this independent panel, which included careful consideration of recently published studies, provide support for use of non-linear extrapolation methods in human health risk assessment for 1,4-DX rodent tumors.
期刊介绍:
Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology publishes peer reviewed articles that involve the generation, evaluation, and interpretation of experimental animal and human data that are of direct importance and relevance for regulatory authorities with respect to toxicological and pharmacological regulations in society. All peer-reviewed articles that are published should be devoted to improve the protection of human health and environment. Reviews and discussions are welcomed that address legal and/or regulatory decisions with respect to risk assessment and management of toxicological and pharmacological compounds on a scientific basis. It addresses an international readership of scientists, risk assessors and managers, and other professionals active in the field of human and environmental health.
Types of peer-reviewed articles published:
-Original research articles of relevance for regulatory aspects covering aspects including, but not limited to:
1.Factors influencing human sensitivity
2.Exposure science related to risk assessment
3.Alternative toxicological test methods
4.Frameworks for evaluation and integration of data in regulatory evaluations
5.Harmonization across regulatory agencies
6.Read-across methods and evaluations
-Contemporary Reviews on policy related Research issues
-Letters to the Editor
-Guest Editorials (by Invitation)