用于处理急诊科儿童和青少年急性严重行为障碍的非药物降级技术:随机对照试验的二次分析

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Kate Klein, Christopher Selman, Amit Kochar, Deborah Shellshear, Meredith Louise Borland, Shane George, Shefali Jani, Doris Tham, Katherine Lee, Simon Craig, Franz E Babl, Elyssia M Bourke
{"title":"用于处理急诊科儿童和青少年急性严重行为障碍的非药物降级技术:随机对照试验的二次分析","authors":"Kate Klein, Christopher Selman, Amit Kochar, Deborah Shellshear, Meredith Louise Borland, Shane George, Shefali Jani, Doris Tham, Katherine Lee, Simon Craig, Franz E Babl, Elyssia M Bourke","doi":"10.1136/archdischild-2025-328921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the frequency and nature of non-pharmacological de-escalation methods used for children and adolescents presenting to emergency departments (EDs) with acute severe behavioural disturbance (ASBD).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Secondary analysis of a randomised, controlled, open-label, multicentre trial of oral olanzapine versus oral diazepam for the management of ASBD.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Nine EDs in Australia between October 2021 and November 2023.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Children aged 9-17 years, for whom information on non-pharmacological de-escalation attempts was recorded, who ultimately required oral sedative medication to manage their ASBD.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The frequency and nature of the use of non-pharmacological de-escalation methods for children and adolescents presenting to EDs in a state of ASBD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 348 participants enrolled in the randomised controlled trial. This study reports on the 337 of 348 participants (97%) for whom information was recorded regarding non-pharmacological de-escalation attempts during the trial period. Verbal de-escalation was the most commonly attempted technique (96%) followed by active listening (75%). The frequency and nature of de-escalation techniques used were similar across the nine participating sites.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A variety of non-pharmacological de-escalation strategies are used among patients who require oral sedative medication. There is a need for studies to investigate whether there are optimal first-line de-escalation strategies and to determine their effectiveness and order of use in children and adolescents presenting to EDs with ASBD.</p>","PeriodicalId":8150,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Disease in Childhood","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non-pharmacological de-escalation techniques used to manage acute severe behavioural disturbance in children and adolescents presenting to emergency departments: secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Kate Klein, Christopher Selman, Amit Kochar, Deborah Shellshear, Meredith Louise Borland, Shane George, Shefali Jani, Doris Tham, Katherine Lee, Simon Craig, Franz E Babl, Elyssia M Bourke\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/archdischild-2025-328921\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the frequency and nature of non-pharmacological de-escalation methods used for children and adolescents presenting to emergency departments (EDs) with acute severe behavioural disturbance (ASBD).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Secondary analysis of a randomised, controlled, open-label, multicentre trial of oral olanzapine versus oral diazepam for the management of ASBD.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Nine EDs in Australia between October 2021 and November 2023.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Children aged 9-17 years, for whom information on non-pharmacological de-escalation attempts was recorded, who ultimately required oral sedative medication to manage their ASBD.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The frequency and nature of the use of non-pharmacological de-escalation methods for children and adolescents presenting to EDs in a state of ASBD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 348 participants enrolled in the randomised controlled trial. This study reports on the 337 of 348 participants (97%) for whom information was recorded regarding non-pharmacological de-escalation attempts during the trial period. Verbal de-escalation was the most commonly attempted technique (96%) followed by active listening (75%). The frequency and nature of de-escalation techniques used were similar across the nine participating sites.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A variety of non-pharmacological de-escalation strategies are used among patients who require oral sedative medication. There is a need for studies to investigate whether there are optimal first-line de-escalation strategies and to determine their effectiveness and order of use in children and adolescents presenting to EDs with ASBD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8150,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Disease in Childhood\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Disease in Childhood\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2025-328921\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Disease in Childhood","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2025-328921","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:描述急性严重行为障碍(ASBD)儿童和青少年急诊科(EDs)使用非药物降级方法的频率和性质。设计:对口服奥氮平与口服地西泮治疗ASBD的随机、对照、开放标签、多中心试验进行二次分析。背景:2021年10月至2023年11月期间在澳大利亚的9个教育项目。参与者:9-17岁的儿童,他们记录了非药物降级尝试的信息,最终需要口服镇静剂来控制他们的ASBD。主要结果测量:在ASBD状态下出现急诊科的儿童和青少年中,使用非药物降压方法的频率和性质。结果:共有348名受试者入组随机对照试验。本研究报告了348名参与者中的337名(97%),他们在试验期间记录了有关非药物降级尝试的信息。言语缓和是最常用的方法(96%),其次是积极倾听(75%)。在九个参与的地点,使用降级技术的频率和性质是相似的。结论:需要口服镇静药物的患者可采用多种非药物降压策略。有必要进行研究,以调查是否存在最佳的一线降级策略,并确定其在患有ASBD的急诊科儿童和青少年中的有效性和使用顺序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Non-pharmacological de-escalation techniques used to manage acute severe behavioural disturbance in children and adolescents presenting to emergency departments: secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial.

Objective: To describe the frequency and nature of non-pharmacological de-escalation methods used for children and adolescents presenting to emergency departments (EDs) with acute severe behavioural disturbance (ASBD).

Design: Secondary analysis of a randomised, controlled, open-label, multicentre trial of oral olanzapine versus oral diazepam for the management of ASBD.

Setting: Nine EDs in Australia between October 2021 and November 2023.

Participants: Children aged 9-17 years, for whom information on non-pharmacological de-escalation attempts was recorded, who ultimately required oral sedative medication to manage their ASBD.

Main outcome measures: The frequency and nature of the use of non-pharmacological de-escalation methods for children and adolescents presenting to EDs in a state of ASBD.

Results: There were 348 participants enrolled in the randomised controlled trial. This study reports on the 337 of 348 participants (97%) for whom information was recorded regarding non-pharmacological de-escalation attempts during the trial period. Verbal de-escalation was the most commonly attempted technique (96%) followed by active listening (75%). The frequency and nature of de-escalation techniques used were similar across the nine participating sites.

Conclusions: A variety of non-pharmacological de-escalation strategies are used among patients who require oral sedative medication. There is a need for studies to investigate whether there are optimal first-line de-escalation strategies and to determine their effectiveness and order of use in children and adolescents presenting to EDs with ASBD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.80%
发文量
291
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Archives of Disease in Childhood is an international peer review journal that aims to keep paediatricians and others up to date with advances in the diagnosis and treatment of childhood diseases as well as advocacy issues such as child protection. It focuses on all aspects of child health and disease from the perinatal period (in the Fetal and Neonatal edition) through to adolescence. ADC includes original research reports, commentaries, reviews of clinical and policy issues, and evidence reports. Areas covered include: community child health, public health, epidemiology, acute paediatrics, advocacy, and ethics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信