RPE vs MARPE后晚期青少年和年轻人骨骼和鼻腔气流变化:一项随机临床试验

IF 3.2
Isil Aras, David Cruz Walma, Oscar Olavarria, Eman Othman, Sercan Akyalcin
{"title":"RPE vs MARPE后晚期青少年和年轻人骨骼和鼻腔气流变化:一项随机临床试验","authors":"Isil Aras, David Cruz Walma, Oscar Olavarria, Eman Othman, Sercan Akyalcin","doi":"10.2319/121224-1020.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare differential changes in nasal patency and dentoskeletal morphology after rapid palatal expansion (RPE) vs hybrid miniscrew-assisted rapid maxillary expansion (MARPE).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Thirty patients presenting with bilateral crossbite were randomized into RPE or hybrid MARPE treatment groups. MARPE patients were treated using the two-point hyrax appliance and RPE patients were treated using the conventional hyrax appliance. Nasal patency was evaluated using rhinomanometry and dentoskeletal changes were evaluated using cone beam computed tomography images.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The success of suture opening was 46.6% and 60% in the RPE (mean age: 17.36 ± 1.80) and MARPE groups (mean age: 18.52 ± 1.80), respectively. The MARPE group showed significantly increased nasal airflow and decreased nasal resistance during inspiration and expiration compared to the RPE group after 4 months of treatment. The RPE group demonstrated nonsignificant changes in the same parameters after 4 months. Although significant differences between groups were observed in nasal flow during inspiration and expiration for both nostrils, intergroup differences in nasal resistance were not significant (P > .05). The MARPE group exhibited greater expansion in nasal, maxillary basal, and alveolar widths compared to the RPE group. A more pronounced decrease in buccal bone thickness was observed in the RPE group. The buccal inclination of the first premolars and molars significantly increased in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although similar success rates for sutural opening were observed between MARPE and RPE, MARPE facilitated more pronounced changes in nasal patency and skeletal maxillary expansion compared to conventional RPE.</p>","PeriodicalId":94224,"journal":{"name":"The Angle orthodontist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Skeletal and nasal airflow changes in late adolescents and young adults after RPE vs MARPE: a randomized clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Isil Aras, David Cruz Walma, Oscar Olavarria, Eman Othman, Sercan Akyalcin\",\"doi\":\"10.2319/121224-1020.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare differential changes in nasal patency and dentoskeletal morphology after rapid palatal expansion (RPE) vs hybrid miniscrew-assisted rapid maxillary expansion (MARPE).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Thirty patients presenting with bilateral crossbite were randomized into RPE or hybrid MARPE treatment groups. MARPE patients were treated using the two-point hyrax appliance and RPE patients were treated using the conventional hyrax appliance. Nasal patency was evaluated using rhinomanometry and dentoskeletal changes were evaluated using cone beam computed tomography images.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The success of suture opening was 46.6% and 60% in the RPE (mean age: 17.36 ± 1.80) and MARPE groups (mean age: 18.52 ± 1.80), respectively. The MARPE group showed significantly increased nasal airflow and decreased nasal resistance during inspiration and expiration compared to the RPE group after 4 months of treatment. The RPE group demonstrated nonsignificant changes in the same parameters after 4 months. Although significant differences between groups were observed in nasal flow during inspiration and expiration for both nostrils, intergroup differences in nasal resistance were not significant (P > .05). The MARPE group exhibited greater expansion in nasal, maxillary basal, and alveolar widths compared to the RPE group. A more pronounced decrease in buccal bone thickness was observed in the RPE group. The buccal inclination of the first premolars and molars significantly increased in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although similar success rates for sutural opening were observed between MARPE and RPE, MARPE facilitated more pronounced changes in nasal patency and skeletal maxillary expansion compared to conventional RPE.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94224,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Angle orthodontist\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Angle orthodontist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2319/121224-1020.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Angle orthodontist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2319/121224-1020.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较快速腭扩张(RPE)与混合微型辅助快速上颌扩张(MARPE)后鼻腔通畅和牙骨形态的差异变化。材料与方法:将30例双侧牙合患者随机分为RPE组和混合MARPE组。MARPE患者采用两点hyrax矫治器治疗,RPE患者采用常规hyrax矫治器治疗。使用鼻压测量法评估鼻腔通畅,使用锥形束计算机断层扫描图像评估牙齿骨骼变化。结果:RPE组(平均年龄:17.36±1.80)和MARPE组(平均年龄:18.52±1.80)的开缝成功率分别为46.6%和60%。治疗4个月后,与RPE组相比,MARPE组吸气和呼气时鼻气流明显增加,鼻阻力明显降低。RPE组在4个月后相同参数无显著变化。双鼻孔吸气和呼气时鼻流量组间差异有统计学意义,但鼻阻力组间差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。与RPE组相比,MARPE组在鼻、上颌基底和牙槽宽度上表现出更大的扩张。RPE组的颊骨厚度下降更为明显。两组第一前磨牙和磨牙的颊倾均明显增加。结论:尽管MARPE和RPE的缝合成功率相似,但与常规RPE相比,MARPE在鼻通畅和上颌骨扩张方面的改变更为明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Skeletal and nasal airflow changes in late adolescents and young adults after RPE vs MARPE: a randomized clinical trial.

Objectives: To compare differential changes in nasal patency and dentoskeletal morphology after rapid palatal expansion (RPE) vs hybrid miniscrew-assisted rapid maxillary expansion (MARPE).

Materials and methods: Thirty patients presenting with bilateral crossbite were randomized into RPE or hybrid MARPE treatment groups. MARPE patients were treated using the two-point hyrax appliance and RPE patients were treated using the conventional hyrax appliance. Nasal patency was evaluated using rhinomanometry and dentoskeletal changes were evaluated using cone beam computed tomography images.

Results: The success of suture opening was 46.6% and 60% in the RPE (mean age: 17.36 ± 1.80) and MARPE groups (mean age: 18.52 ± 1.80), respectively. The MARPE group showed significantly increased nasal airflow and decreased nasal resistance during inspiration and expiration compared to the RPE group after 4 months of treatment. The RPE group demonstrated nonsignificant changes in the same parameters after 4 months. Although significant differences between groups were observed in nasal flow during inspiration and expiration for both nostrils, intergroup differences in nasal resistance were not significant (P > .05). The MARPE group exhibited greater expansion in nasal, maxillary basal, and alveolar widths compared to the RPE group. A more pronounced decrease in buccal bone thickness was observed in the RPE group. The buccal inclination of the first premolars and molars significantly increased in both groups.

Conclusions: Although similar success rates for sutural opening were observed between MARPE and RPE, MARPE facilitated more pronounced changes in nasal patency and skeletal maxillary expansion compared to conventional RPE.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信