麻醉技术对超声引导甲状腺切除术中接受心理干预的甲状腺癌患者术后生物应激反应的影响。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Yunyao Deng, Mei Peng, Kun Zhou
{"title":"麻醉技术对超声引导甲状腺切除术中接受心理干预的甲状腺癌患者术后生物应激反应的影响。","authors":"Yunyao Deng, Mei Peng, Kun Zhou","doi":"10.1177/10849785251380029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> To examine the influence of various anesthetic techniques on the postoperative biological stress response in thyroid cancer (TC) patients receiving psychological nursing intervention during ultrasound-guided radical thyroidectomy. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> TC patients undergoing ultrasound-guided radical thyroidectomy at The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University between January 2020 and June 2022 were enrolled and randomly assigned to two groups based on anesthetic protocol. Both groups received general anesthesia and standardized psychological nursing intervention. Intervention group received remifentanil-propofol anesthesia, whereas reference group received sevoflurane-propofol anesthesia. Hemodynamic parameters, serum stress biomarkers (cortisol [Cor], norepinephrine [NE], glucose [Glu]), inflammatory cytokines (interleukin-1β, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin-10), pain intensity (visual analog scale [VAS] scores), recovery metrics, adverse events, and psychological outcomes were evaluated and compared. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The intervention group showed significantly shorter response recovery time, eye-opening time, spontaneous respiration recovery time, and extubation time than reference group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Postoperative VAS scores decreased in both groups from 0.5 to 12 h, with the intervention group reporting consistently lower scores at all time points (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Hemodynamic parameters (heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure) and serum stress biomarkers (Cor, NE, Glu) were significantly lower in intervention group during key intraoperative periods (T1, T2, T3) (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Inflammatory cytokine levels rose intraoperatively in both groups, but were markedly lower in intervention group at T3, T4, and T5 (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The adverse reactions' incidence was also lower in intervention group (χ<sup>2</sup> = 4.523, <i>p</i> < 0.05). Both groups showed improved psychological status, comfort, and illness perception postintervention, with nursing satisfaction exceeding 90%. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Remifentanil-propofol anesthesia, when combined with psychological intervention, provides superior control over the biological stress response, enhances analgesia, and promotes faster recovery compared with sevoflurane-propofol anesthesia in TC patients undergoing ultrasound-guided thyroidectomy. This approach is clinically beneficial and warrants broader application.</p>","PeriodicalId":55277,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Biotherapy and Radiopharmaceuticals","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of Anesthetic Technique on the Postoperative Biological Stress Response in Thyroid Cancer Patients Receiving Psychological Intervention During Ultrasound-Guided Thyroidectomy.\",\"authors\":\"Yunyao Deng, Mei Peng, Kun Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10849785251380029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> To examine the influence of various anesthetic techniques on the postoperative biological stress response in thyroid cancer (TC) patients receiving psychological nursing intervention during ultrasound-guided radical thyroidectomy. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> TC patients undergoing ultrasound-guided radical thyroidectomy at The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University between January 2020 and June 2022 were enrolled and randomly assigned to two groups based on anesthetic protocol. Both groups received general anesthesia and standardized psychological nursing intervention. Intervention group received remifentanil-propofol anesthesia, whereas reference group received sevoflurane-propofol anesthesia. Hemodynamic parameters, serum stress biomarkers (cortisol [Cor], norepinephrine [NE], glucose [Glu]), inflammatory cytokines (interleukin-1β, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin-10), pain intensity (visual analog scale [VAS] scores), recovery metrics, adverse events, and psychological outcomes were evaluated and compared. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The intervention group showed significantly shorter response recovery time, eye-opening time, spontaneous respiration recovery time, and extubation time than reference group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Postoperative VAS scores decreased in both groups from 0.5 to 12 h, with the intervention group reporting consistently lower scores at all time points (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Hemodynamic parameters (heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure) and serum stress biomarkers (Cor, NE, Glu) were significantly lower in intervention group during key intraoperative periods (T1, T2, T3) (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Inflammatory cytokine levels rose intraoperatively in both groups, but were markedly lower in intervention group at T3, T4, and T5 (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The adverse reactions' incidence was also lower in intervention group (χ<sup>2</sup> = 4.523, <i>p</i> < 0.05). Both groups showed improved psychological status, comfort, and illness perception postintervention, with nursing satisfaction exceeding 90%. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Remifentanil-propofol anesthesia, when combined with psychological intervention, provides superior control over the biological stress response, enhances analgesia, and promotes faster recovery compared with sevoflurane-propofol anesthesia in TC patients undergoing ultrasound-guided thyroidectomy. This approach is clinically beneficial and warrants broader application.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55277,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Biotherapy and Radiopharmaceuticals\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Biotherapy and Radiopharmaceuticals\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10849785251380029\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Biotherapy and Radiopharmaceuticals","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10849785251380029","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨不同麻醉方式对超声引导下甲状腺癌根治术中心理护理干预患者术后生物应激反应的影响。方法:选取2020年1月~ 2022年6月在南方医科大学第三附属医院行超声引导下甲状腺根治术的TC患者,根据麻醉方案随机分为两组。两组均给予全麻及规范化的心理护理干预。干预组采用瑞芬太尼-异丙酚麻醉,对照组采用七氟醚-异丙酚麻醉。血流动力学参数、血清应激生物标志物(皮质醇[Cor]、去甲肾上腺素[NE]、葡萄糖[Glu])、炎症因子(白细胞介素-1β、肿瘤坏死因子- α、白细胞介素-10)、疼痛强度(视觉模拟量表[VAS]评分)、恢复指标、不良事件和心理结局进行评估和比较。结果:干预组患者的反应恢复时间、睁眼时间、自主呼吸恢复时间、拔管时间均显著短于对照组(p < 0.05)。术后0.5 ~ 12 h,两组VAS评分均下降,干预组各时间点评分均较低(p < 0.05)。干预组在术中关键时期(T1、T2、T3)血流动力学参数(心率、收缩压、舒张压)和血清应激生物指标(Cor、NE、Glu)均显著降低(p < 0.05)。两组患者术中炎性细胞因子水平均升高,但干预组患者术中T3、T4、T5时炎性细胞因子水平明显降低(p < 0.05)。干预组不良反应发生率较对照组低(χ2 = 4.523, p < 0.05)。两组患者干预后心理状态、舒适度、疾病感知均有改善,护理满意度均超过90%。结论:与七氟醚-异丙酚麻醉相比,瑞芬太尼-异丙酚麻醉联合心理干预对超声引导下TC患者的生物应激反应有更好的控制,镇痛效果更好,恢复更快。这种方法在临床上是有益的,值得更广泛的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Influence of Anesthetic Technique on the Postoperative Biological Stress Response in Thyroid Cancer Patients Receiving Psychological Intervention During Ultrasound-Guided Thyroidectomy.

Objective: To examine the influence of various anesthetic techniques on the postoperative biological stress response in thyroid cancer (TC) patients receiving psychological nursing intervention during ultrasound-guided radical thyroidectomy. Methods: TC patients undergoing ultrasound-guided radical thyroidectomy at The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University between January 2020 and June 2022 were enrolled and randomly assigned to two groups based on anesthetic protocol. Both groups received general anesthesia and standardized psychological nursing intervention. Intervention group received remifentanil-propofol anesthesia, whereas reference group received sevoflurane-propofol anesthesia. Hemodynamic parameters, serum stress biomarkers (cortisol [Cor], norepinephrine [NE], glucose [Glu]), inflammatory cytokines (interleukin-1β, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin-10), pain intensity (visual analog scale [VAS] scores), recovery metrics, adverse events, and psychological outcomes were evaluated and compared. Results: The intervention group showed significantly shorter response recovery time, eye-opening time, spontaneous respiration recovery time, and extubation time than reference group (p < 0.05). Postoperative VAS scores decreased in both groups from 0.5 to 12 h, with the intervention group reporting consistently lower scores at all time points (p < 0.05). Hemodynamic parameters (heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure) and serum stress biomarkers (Cor, NE, Glu) were significantly lower in intervention group during key intraoperative periods (T1, T2, T3) (p < 0.05). Inflammatory cytokine levels rose intraoperatively in both groups, but were markedly lower in intervention group at T3, T4, and T5 (p < 0.05). The adverse reactions' incidence was also lower in intervention group (χ2 = 4.523, p < 0.05). Both groups showed improved psychological status, comfort, and illness perception postintervention, with nursing satisfaction exceeding 90%. Conclusions: Remifentanil-propofol anesthesia, when combined with psychological intervention, provides superior control over the biological stress response, enhances analgesia, and promotes faster recovery compared with sevoflurane-propofol anesthesia in TC patients undergoing ultrasound-guided thyroidectomy. This approach is clinically beneficial and warrants broader application.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
2.90%
发文量
87
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Cancer Biotherapy and Radiopharmaceuticals is the established peer-reviewed journal, with over 25 years of cutting-edge content on innovative therapeutic investigations to ultimately improve cancer management. It is the only journal with the specific focus of cancer biotherapy and is inclusive of monoclonal antibodies, cytokine therapy, cancer gene therapy, cell-based therapies, and other forms of immunotherapies. The Journal includes extensive reporting on advancements in radioimmunotherapy, and the use of radiopharmaceuticals and radiolabeled peptides for the development of new cancer treatments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信