“每个人都有自己的角色”:评估组织对支持高血压护理团队和患者的数字解决方案的准备情况。

IF 2.2 2区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Applied Clinical Informatics Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-26 DOI:10.1055/a-2606-9326
Shannon M Canfield, Abigail J Rolbiecki, Parijat Ghosh, William Martinez, Victoria A Shaffer, Emma E Montgomery, David A Dorr, Richelle J Koopman
{"title":"“每个人都有自己的角色”:评估组织对支持高血压护理团队和患者的数字解决方案的准备情况。","authors":"Shannon M Canfield, Abigail J Rolbiecki, Parijat Ghosh, William Martinez, Victoria A Shaffer, Emma E Montgomery, David A Dorr, Richelle J Koopman","doi":"10.1055/a-2606-9326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hypertension is a significant contributor to cardiovascular disease, yet evidence-based blood pressure (BP) control practices are inconsistently applied. The Collaboration Oriented Approach to Controlling High Blood Pressure (COACH) is a digital clinical decision support tool designed to improve BP self-management and support clinician workflows. While the patient perspective on COACH has been evaluated in a separate study, this study evaluates organizational readiness for COACH implementation across three health systems using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).This study aimed to assess preimplementation facilitators and barriers for COACH, focusing on organizational readiness and modifiable factors influencing scalability.Qualitative interviews were conducted with 72 care team members from nine primary care clinics across three health systems using Epic or Oracle electronic health records. Data were analyzed using CFIR domains: innovation, inner setting, outer setting, individuals, and implementation process. Subdomains were rated from -2 (barrier) to +2 (facilitator).Overall, 79% of CFIR domain scores were positive, suggesting strong readiness for COACH implementation. The innovation domain scored 80% positive, highlighting COACH's user-friendly design, robust evidence base, and perceived advantages over current workflows. The inner setting domain showed 85% positive scores, driven by strong leadership, established infrastructures for patient-centered care, and high motivation for quality improvement. The outer setting domain scored 70% positive, reflecting barriers such as reimbursement policies, resource limitations, and staffing shortages. Participants noted the importance of continued leadership engagement, team-based support, and addressing workload challenges for sustainable implementation.The study demonstrates high organizational readiness for COACH, with critical barriers in reimbursement and resources that must be addressed for successful adoption. Findings underscore COACH's potential to enhance clinical decision-making and patient engagement. Future research should explore long-term impacts on care delivery and outcomes, informing broader adoption of digital health interventions in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":48956,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clinical Informatics","volume":"16 4","pages":"1219-1230"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12473525/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"Everyone Has a Role in This\\\": Evaluating Organizational Readiness for a Digital Solution to Support Hypertension Care Teams and Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Shannon M Canfield, Abigail J Rolbiecki, Parijat Ghosh, William Martinez, Victoria A Shaffer, Emma E Montgomery, David A Dorr, Richelle J Koopman\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2606-9326\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Hypertension is a significant contributor to cardiovascular disease, yet evidence-based blood pressure (BP) control practices are inconsistently applied. The Collaboration Oriented Approach to Controlling High Blood Pressure (COACH) is a digital clinical decision support tool designed to improve BP self-management and support clinician workflows. While the patient perspective on COACH has been evaluated in a separate study, this study evaluates organizational readiness for COACH implementation across three health systems using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).This study aimed to assess preimplementation facilitators and barriers for COACH, focusing on organizational readiness and modifiable factors influencing scalability.Qualitative interviews were conducted with 72 care team members from nine primary care clinics across three health systems using Epic or Oracle electronic health records. Data were analyzed using CFIR domains: innovation, inner setting, outer setting, individuals, and implementation process. Subdomains were rated from -2 (barrier) to +2 (facilitator).Overall, 79% of CFIR domain scores were positive, suggesting strong readiness for COACH implementation. The innovation domain scored 80% positive, highlighting COACH's user-friendly design, robust evidence base, and perceived advantages over current workflows. The inner setting domain showed 85% positive scores, driven by strong leadership, established infrastructures for patient-centered care, and high motivation for quality improvement. The outer setting domain scored 70% positive, reflecting barriers such as reimbursement policies, resource limitations, and staffing shortages. Participants noted the importance of continued leadership engagement, team-based support, and addressing workload challenges for sustainable implementation.The study demonstrates high organizational readiness for COACH, with critical barriers in reimbursement and resources that must be addressed for successful adoption. Findings underscore COACH's potential to enhance clinical decision-making and patient engagement. Future research should explore long-term impacts on care delivery and outcomes, informing broader adoption of digital health interventions in clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48956,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Clinical Informatics\",\"volume\":\"16 4\",\"pages\":\"1219-1230\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12473525/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Clinical Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2606-9326\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL INFORMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clinical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2606-9326","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

高血压是心血管疾病的重要诱因,但循证血压(BP)控制实践的应用并不一致。以协作为导向的高血压控制方法(COACH)是一种数字临床决策支持工具,旨在改善血压自我管理和支持临床医生的工作流程。虽然患者对COACH的看法已在另一项研究中进行了评估,但本研究使用实施研究综合框架(CFIR)评估了三个卫生系统中实施COACH的组织准备情况。本研究旨在评估教练实施前的促进因素和障碍,重点关注组织准备程度和影响可扩展性的可修改因素。使用Epic或Oracle电子健康记录对来自三个卫生系统的9个初级保健诊所的72名护理团队成员进行了定性访谈。采用创新、内部环境、外部环境、个体和实施过程四个CFIR域对数据进行分析。子域的等级从-2(障碍)到+2(促进者)。总体而言,79%的CFIR域得分为正,表明对实施COACH有很强的准备。创新领域获得了80%的好评,突出了COACH的用户友好设计,强大的证据基础,以及相对于当前工作流程的感知优势。内部环境域有85%的正面得分,这是由强有力的领导、以患者为中心的护理基础设施和高质量改进动机所驱动的。外部设置领域的正面得分为70%,反映了诸如报销政策、资源限制和人员短缺等障碍。与会者指出,持续的领导参与、基于团队的支持和应对工作量挑战对可持续实施的重要性。该研究显示了组织对COACH的高度准备,在成功采用方面必须解决报销和资源方面的关键障碍。研究结果强调了COACH在提高临床决策和患者参与度方面的潜力。未来的研究应探索对护理提供和结果的长期影响,为临床实践中更广泛地采用数字健康干预提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
"Everyone Has a Role in This": Evaluating Organizational Readiness for a Digital Solution to Support Hypertension Care Teams and Patients.

Hypertension is a significant contributor to cardiovascular disease, yet evidence-based blood pressure (BP) control practices are inconsistently applied. The Collaboration Oriented Approach to Controlling High Blood Pressure (COACH) is a digital clinical decision support tool designed to improve BP self-management and support clinician workflows. While the patient perspective on COACH has been evaluated in a separate study, this study evaluates organizational readiness for COACH implementation across three health systems using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).This study aimed to assess preimplementation facilitators and barriers for COACH, focusing on organizational readiness and modifiable factors influencing scalability.Qualitative interviews were conducted with 72 care team members from nine primary care clinics across three health systems using Epic or Oracle electronic health records. Data were analyzed using CFIR domains: innovation, inner setting, outer setting, individuals, and implementation process. Subdomains were rated from -2 (barrier) to +2 (facilitator).Overall, 79% of CFIR domain scores were positive, suggesting strong readiness for COACH implementation. The innovation domain scored 80% positive, highlighting COACH's user-friendly design, robust evidence base, and perceived advantages over current workflows. The inner setting domain showed 85% positive scores, driven by strong leadership, established infrastructures for patient-centered care, and high motivation for quality improvement. The outer setting domain scored 70% positive, reflecting barriers such as reimbursement policies, resource limitations, and staffing shortages. Participants noted the importance of continued leadership engagement, team-based support, and addressing workload challenges for sustainable implementation.The study demonstrates high organizational readiness for COACH, with critical barriers in reimbursement and resources that must be addressed for successful adoption. Findings underscore COACH's potential to enhance clinical decision-making and patient engagement. Future research should explore long-term impacts on care delivery and outcomes, informing broader adoption of digital health interventions in clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Clinical Informatics
Applied Clinical Informatics MEDICAL INFORMATICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
24.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: ACI is the third Schattauer journal dealing with biomedical and health informatics. It perfectly complements our other journals Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterMethods of Information in Medicine and the Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterYearbook of Medical Informatics. The Yearbook of Medical Informatics being the “Milestone” or state-of-the-art journal and Methods of Information in Medicine being the “Science and Research” journal of IMIA, ACI intends to be the “Practical” journal of IMIA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信