巴西Baixada Maranhense地区Quilombola群落植物物种利用和优先保护的选择标准

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Thauana Oliveira Rabelo, André Luiz Borba do Nascimento, Eduardo Bezerra de Almeida
{"title":"巴西Baixada Maranhense地区Quilombola群落植物物种利用和优先保护的选择标准","authors":"Thauana Oliveira Rabelo, André Luiz Borba do Nascimento, Eduardo Bezerra de Almeida","doi":"10.1186/s13002-025-00798-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Amazonian biome is home to a vast diversity of plant species that are of fundamental importance to traditional communities such as the Quilombolas. These communities use different criteria to select and prioritize species for use. This study focused on the perceptions of these communities regarding the availability of medicinal, food, and timber plant species, with the aim of identifying priority resources for conservation and assessing the risks associated with the collection of these resources in the Queluz Quilombo, Anajatuba, Maranhão State. To this end, the following hypotheses were tested: Useful plants perceived by informants as more abundant locally will be more multifunctional; (II) more versatile; (III) more frequently recalled by informants; and (IV) there is a difference in collection sites depending on the use category.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between March 2022 and December 2023, 75 out of 105 families residing in the visited communities agreed to participate in the study and were interviewed using semi-structured questionnaires that included socioeconomic questions and free lists. Plants were assessed based on their perceived abundance in the area. Generalized Linear Models were used to examine the relationship between perceived abundance, species versatility, and their salience by category. In addition, percentages were calculated for collection sites and the structure of the most affected plants within each category.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Multifunctionality and versatility food did not significantly affect the perceived abundance of useful plants; however, versatility in medicinal and timber use was found to be significant (p-value: 0.012* e p-value: 0.011*, respectively). Proximity of resources to homes was a key indicator of abundance for food plants, while effectiveness and quality were the primary factors for medicinal and timber species. Timber species such as Paparaúba (Simarouba spp.), Sabiá (Mimosa caesalpiniaefolia Benth.), Pau D'arco (Handroanthus albus (Cham.) Matto), Cedar (Cedrela spp.), and Jenipapo (Genipa americana L.) were identified as being under greater use pressure. However, local factors have mitigated the risks associated with collecting these resources. The study found that medicinal and food plants are mainly collected in backyards (87.07%), while timber plants are more commonly gathered from the forest (74.14%). The parts of plants most affected differ by category, with leaves (97.14%) and fruits (77.73%) being primarily collected from medicinal and food plants, respectively, and stems (100%) from timber plants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings provide valuable insights for the development of conservation strategies and the sustainable management of plant resources within local communities. The results emphasize the need to consider both biodiversity and the socioeconomic and cultural dimensions involved in the use of these natural resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":49162,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine","volume":"21 1","pages":"62"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12465610/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Selection criteria for use and conservation priorities for plant species in a Quilombola community in Baixada Maranhense, Brazil.\",\"authors\":\"Thauana Oliveira Rabelo, André Luiz Borba do Nascimento, Eduardo Bezerra de Almeida\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13002-025-00798-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Amazonian biome is home to a vast diversity of plant species that are of fundamental importance to traditional communities such as the Quilombolas. These communities use different criteria to select and prioritize species for use. This study focused on the perceptions of these communities regarding the availability of medicinal, food, and timber plant species, with the aim of identifying priority resources for conservation and assessing the risks associated with the collection of these resources in the Queluz Quilombo, Anajatuba, Maranhão State. To this end, the following hypotheses were tested: Useful plants perceived by informants as more abundant locally will be more multifunctional; (II) more versatile; (III) more frequently recalled by informants; and (IV) there is a difference in collection sites depending on the use category.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between March 2022 and December 2023, 75 out of 105 families residing in the visited communities agreed to participate in the study and were interviewed using semi-structured questionnaires that included socioeconomic questions and free lists. Plants were assessed based on their perceived abundance in the area. Generalized Linear Models were used to examine the relationship between perceived abundance, species versatility, and their salience by category. In addition, percentages were calculated for collection sites and the structure of the most affected plants within each category.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Multifunctionality and versatility food did not significantly affect the perceived abundance of useful plants; however, versatility in medicinal and timber use was found to be significant (p-value: 0.012* e p-value: 0.011*, respectively). Proximity of resources to homes was a key indicator of abundance for food plants, while effectiveness and quality were the primary factors for medicinal and timber species. Timber species such as Paparaúba (Simarouba spp.), Sabiá (Mimosa caesalpiniaefolia Benth.), Pau D'arco (Handroanthus albus (Cham.) Matto), Cedar (Cedrela spp.), and Jenipapo (Genipa americana L.) were identified as being under greater use pressure. However, local factors have mitigated the risks associated with collecting these resources. The study found that medicinal and food plants are mainly collected in backyards (87.07%), while timber plants are more commonly gathered from the forest (74.14%). The parts of plants most affected differ by category, with leaves (97.14%) and fruits (77.73%) being primarily collected from medicinal and food plants, respectively, and stems (100%) from timber plants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings provide valuable insights for the development of conservation strategies and the sustainable management of plant resources within local communities. The results emphasize the need to consider both biodiversity and the socioeconomic and cultural dimensions involved in the use of these natural resources.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49162,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"62\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12465610/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-025-00798-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-025-00798-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:亚马逊生物群系是多种多样的植物物种的家园,这些物种对像Quilombolas这样的传统社区至关重要。这些群落使用不同的标准来选择和优先考虑使用的物种。这项研究的重点是这些社区对药用、食品和木材植物物种的可获得性的看法,目的是确定优先保护的资源,并评估在马兰赫奥州阿纳加图巴的Queluz Quilombo收集这些资源的风险。为此,对以下假设进行了检验:被举报人认为在当地更丰富的有用植物将更具多功能;(二)更通用性;(三)更频繁地被举报人召回的;(四)根据使用类别,收集地点有所不同。方法:在2022年3月至2023年12月期间,居住在被访问社区的105个家庭中有75个同意参与研究,并使用半结构化问卷进行访谈,其中包括社会经济问题和免费清单。植物的评估是基于它们在该地区的丰度。使用广义线性模型来检验感知丰度,物种多功能性及其类别显著性之间的关系。此外,还计算了每个类别中收集地点和受影响最严重植物的结构的百分比。结果:多功能性和多功能性食物对有用植物的感知丰度没有显著影响;然而,药用和木材用途的通用性显著(p值分别为0.012*和0.011*)。食物植物丰度的关键指标是资源与家庭的距离,而药用和木材物种的有效性和质量是主要因素。木材种类如Paparaúba (Simarouba spp.), sabi(含羞草),Pau D'arco(白花Handroanthus albus (Cham.))。马托木、雪松木(Cedrela spp.)和美洲杉(Genipa americana L.)的利用压力较大。然而,当地因素减轻了与收集这些资源有关的风险。研究发现药用和食用植物主要采集于后院(87.07%),木材植物多采于森林(74.14%)。受影响最严重的植物部位因类别而异,叶(97.14%)和果(77.73%)主要分别来自药用和食用植物,茎(100%)来自木材植物。结论:这些发现为制定保护策略和当地社区植物资源的可持续管理提供了有价值的见解。研究结果强调,在利用这些自然资源的过程中,需要同时考虑生物多样性以及社会经济和文化方面的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Selection criteria for use and conservation priorities for plant species in a Quilombola community in Baixada Maranhense, Brazil.

Background: The Amazonian biome is home to a vast diversity of plant species that are of fundamental importance to traditional communities such as the Quilombolas. These communities use different criteria to select and prioritize species for use. This study focused on the perceptions of these communities regarding the availability of medicinal, food, and timber plant species, with the aim of identifying priority resources for conservation and assessing the risks associated with the collection of these resources in the Queluz Quilombo, Anajatuba, Maranhão State. To this end, the following hypotheses were tested: Useful plants perceived by informants as more abundant locally will be more multifunctional; (II) more versatile; (III) more frequently recalled by informants; and (IV) there is a difference in collection sites depending on the use category.

Methods: Between March 2022 and December 2023, 75 out of 105 families residing in the visited communities agreed to participate in the study and were interviewed using semi-structured questionnaires that included socioeconomic questions and free lists. Plants were assessed based on their perceived abundance in the area. Generalized Linear Models were used to examine the relationship between perceived abundance, species versatility, and their salience by category. In addition, percentages were calculated for collection sites and the structure of the most affected plants within each category.

Results: Multifunctionality and versatility food did not significantly affect the perceived abundance of useful plants; however, versatility in medicinal and timber use was found to be significant (p-value: 0.012* e p-value: 0.011*, respectively). Proximity of resources to homes was a key indicator of abundance for food plants, while effectiveness and quality were the primary factors for medicinal and timber species. Timber species such as Paparaúba (Simarouba spp.), Sabiá (Mimosa caesalpiniaefolia Benth.), Pau D'arco (Handroanthus albus (Cham.) Matto), Cedar (Cedrela spp.), and Jenipapo (Genipa americana L.) were identified as being under greater use pressure. However, local factors have mitigated the risks associated with collecting these resources. The study found that medicinal and food plants are mainly collected in backyards (87.07%), while timber plants are more commonly gathered from the forest (74.14%). The parts of plants most affected differ by category, with leaves (97.14%) and fruits (77.73%) being primarily collected from medicinal and food plants, respectively, and stems (100%) from timber plants.

Conclusions: These findings provide valuable insights for the development of conservation strategies and the sustainable management of plant resources within local communities. The results emphasize the need to consider both biodiversity and the socioeconomic and cultural dimensions involved in the use of these natural resources.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
66
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine publishes original research focusing on cultural perceptions of nature and of human and animal health. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine invites research articles, reviews and commentaries concerning the investigations of the inextricable links between human societies and nature, food, and health. Specifically, the journal covers the following topics: ethnobotany, ethnomycology, ethnozoology, ethnoecology (including ethnopedology), ethnogastronomy, ethnomedicine, ethnoveterinary, as well as all related areas in environmental, nutritional, and medical anthropology. Research focusing on the implications that the inclusion of humanistic, cultural, and social dimensions have in understanding the biological word is also welcome, as well as its potential projections in public health-centred, nutritional, and environmental policies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信