在乳腺癌幸存者的网络平台上采用和实施有效的同伴传递的体育活动项目:组织准备和观点。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Danielle M Ostendorf, Amy G Huebschmann, Karen E Wickersham, Madison Kindred, Bernardine M Pinto
{"title":"在乳腺癌幸存者的网络平台上采用和实施有效的同伴传递的体育活动项目:组织准备和观点。","authors":"Danielle M Ostendorf, Amy G Huebschmann, Karen E Wickersham, Madison Kindred, Bernardine M Pinto","doi":"10.1093/tbm/ibaf051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Moving forward together (MFT) program is a 3-month, peer-led, physical activity (PA) program for survivors of breast cancer and has shown effectiveness in increasing survivors' moderate-to-vigorous PA. We adapted an existing web-based platform to the MFT program, created webMFT, and partnered with four cancer care organizations to implement webMFT.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To understand factors that influence adoption, implementation, and potential for maintenance of webMFT at the organizational level.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used mixed methods to assess organizational readiness and facilitators/barriers for the organizational adoption and implementation of webMFT. In the preimplementation phase, eight representatives completed the organizational readiness for implementing change (ORIC) measure [2 subscales: commitment to change (CC) and efficacy for change (EC), score range = 1-5]. After implementation, four representatives also participated in a semistructured interview. Interviews were coded by two researchers using content analysis. Quantitative and qualitative results were integrated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ORIC scores showed high readiness: CC (mean ± SD; 4.42 ± 0.65) and EC (3.98 ± 0.64). Qualitative categories aligned with quantitative results and included: (i) Strong alignment of mission between webMFT and organizations; (ii) Motivation to adopt webMFT to support their communities; (iii) Lower organizational capacity to recruit participants to receive webMFT than capacity to recruit peer mentors to deliver webMFT; (iv) Resource needs-to scale out and sustain webMFT requires dedicated organizational staff time; and (v) Organizational members found webMFT staff helpful, professional, and communicative, which made partnering a positive experience.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Organizational perspectives provided insights into challenges and opportunities for the scalability of evidence-based programs for cancer survivors.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial information: </strong>The Clinical Trials Registration #: NCT05409664.</p>","PeriodicalId":48679,"journal":{"name":"Translational Behavioral Medicine","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adopting and implementing an efficacious peer-delivered physical activity program for web platform delivery in survivors of breast cancer: organizational readiness and perspectives.\",\"authors\":\"Danielle M Ostendorf, Amy G Huebschmann, Karen E Wickersham, Madison Kindred, Bernardine M Pinto\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/tbm/ibaf051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Moving forward together (MFT) program is a 3-month, peer-led, physical activity (PA) program for survivors of breast cancer and has shown effectiveness in increasing survivors' moderate-to-vigorous PA. We adapted an existing web-based platform to the MFT program, created webMFT, and partnered with four cancer care organizations to implement webMFT.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To understand factors that influence adoption, implementation, and potential for maintenance of webMFT at the organizational level.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used mixed methods to assess organizational readiness and facilitators/barriers for the organizational adoption and implementation of webMFT. In the preimplementation phase, eight representatives completed the organizational readiness for implementing change (ORIC) measure [2 subscales: commitment to change (CC) and efficacy for change (EC), score range = 1-5]. After implementation, four representatives also participated in a semistructured interview. Interviews were coded by two researchers using content analysis. Quantitative and qualitative results were integrated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ORIC scores showed high readiness: CC (mean ± SD; 4.42 ± 0.65) and EC (3.98 ± 0.64). Qualitative categories aligned with quantitative results and included: (i) Strong alignment of mission between webMFT and organizations; (ii) Motivation to adopt webMFT to support their communities; (iii) Lower organizational capacity to recruit participants to receive webMFT than capacity to recruit peer mentors to deliver webMFT; (iv) Resource needs-to scale out and sustain webMFT requires dedicated organizational staff time; and (v) Organizational members found webMFT staff helpful, professional, and communicative, which made partnering a positive experience.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Organizational perspectives provided insights into challenges and opportunities for the scalability of evidence-based programs for cancer survivors.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial information: </strong>The Clinical Trials Registration #: NCT05409664.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48679,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Translational Behavioral Medicine\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Translational Behavioral Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibaf051\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Behavioral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibaf051","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:共同前进(MFT)项目是一项针对乳腺癌幸存者的为期3个月的同伴主导的体育活动(PA)项目,已显示出增加幸存者中度至剧烈PA的有效性。我们将现有的基于网络的平台改编为MFT项目,创建了webMFT,并与四家癌症护理组织合作实施webMFT。目的:了解在组织层面上影响webMFT的采用、实现和潜在维护的因素。方法:我们使用混合方法来评估组织采用和实施webMFT的组织准备情况和促进因素/障碍。在实施前阶段,8名代表完成了实施变革的组织准备(ORIC)测量[2个子量表:变革承诺(CC)和变革效能(EC),得分范围= 1-5]。实施后,四位代表还参加了半结构化访谈。访谈由两位研究人员使用内容分析进行编码。定量和定性结果相结合。结果:ORIC评分呈高准备状态:CC (mean±SD; 4.42±0.65)和EC(3.98±0.64)。定性分类与定量结果一致,包括:(i) webMFT与组织之间的使命高度一致;采用webMFT支持其社区的动机;(iii)组织招募参与者接受webMFT的能力低于招募同伴导师提供webMFT的能力;资源需要- -扩大和维持网络金融需要组织工作人员的专门时间;组织成员认为webMFT员工乐于助人、专业且善于沟通,这使得合作成为一种积极的体验。结论:组织视角为癌症幸存者循证项目的可扩展性提供了挑战和机遇的见解。临床试验信息:临床试验注册号:NCT05409664。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Adopting and implementing an efficacious peer-delivered physical activity program for web platform delivery in survivors of breast cancer: organizational readiness and perspectives.

Background: The Moving forward together (MFT) program is a 3-month, peer-led, physical activity (PA) program for survivors of breast cancer and has shown effectiveness in increasing survivors' moderate-to-vigorous PA. We adapted an existing web-based platform to the MFT program, created webMFT, and partnered with four cancer care organizations to implement webMFT.

Purpose: To understand factors that influence adoption, implementation, and potential for maintenance of webMFT at the organizational level.

Methods: We used mixed methods to assess organizational readiness and facilitators/barriers for the organizational adoption and implementation of webMFT. In the preimplementation phase, eight representatives completed the organizational readiness for implementing change (ORIC) measure [2 subscales: commitment to change (CC) and efficacy for change (EC), score range = 1-5]. After implementation, four representatives also participated in a semistructured interview. Interviews were coded by two researchers using content analysis. Quantitative and qualitative results were integrated.

Results: ORIC scores showed high readiness: CC (mean ± SD; 4.42 ± 0.65) and EC (3.98 ± 0.64). Qualitative categories aligned with quantitative results and included: (i) Strong alignment of mission between webMFT and organizations; (ii) Motivation to adopt webMFT to support their communities; (iii) Lower organizational capacity to recruit participants to receive webMFT than capacity to recruit peer mentors to deliver webMFT; (iv) Resource needs-to scale out and sustain webMFT requires dedicated organizational staff time; and (v) Organizational members found webMFT staff helpful, professional, and communicative, which made partnering a positive experience.

Conclusions: Organizational perspectives provided insights into challenges and opportunities for the scalability of evidence-based programs for cancer survivors.

Clinical trial information: The Clinical Trials Registration #: NCT05409664.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Translational Behavioral Medicine
Translational Behavioral Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: Translational Behavioral Medicine publishes content that engages, informs, and catalyzes dialogue about behavioral medicine among the research, practice, and policy communities. TBM began receiving an Impact Factor in 2015 and currently holds an Impact Factor of 2.989. TBM is one of two journals published by the Society of Behavioral Medicine. The Society of Behavioral Medicine is a multidisciplinary organization of clinicians, educators, and scientists dedicated to promoting the study of the interactions of behavior with biology and the environment, and then applying that knowledge to improve the health and well-being of individuals, families, communities, and populations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信