Jan-Aushadi方案的非专利吸入性支气管扩张剂与品牌替代品的经济评价。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Jerin James, Neha Pillai Vinod, Mridula Murali Manohar, Rishi Kumaran B
{"title":"Jan-Aushadi方案的非专利吸入性支气管扩张剂与品牌替代品的经济评价。","authors":"Jerin James, Neha Pillai Vinod, Mridula Murali Manohar, Rishi Kumaran B","doi":"10.1186/s12962-025-00648-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>In India, the burden of respiratory diseases has brought about a need for the use of inhalational bronchodilators, which often pose a financial strain for a significant portion of the underprivileged population. Hence Jan Aushadhi initiative makes available quality drugs at affordable prices through dedicated stores through-out India. The objective of this study was to perform a cost comparison study of generic inhalational bronchodilators provided through Jan Aushadi pharmacies versus their branded counterparts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The cost of Jan Aushadi drugs and the cost of the most expensive and cheapest marketed branded drugs for the same molecule and dose were ascertained and presented in Indian rupees. The cost difference, cost ratio and cost variance were calculated by comparing the price of Jan Aushadi generic drugs with the most expensive and cheapest branded drugs in the same category.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to branded drugs, all the Jan Aushadi generic drugs were cheaper, except one (SALMETROL). The highest cost difference was observed for Tiotropium Bromide, while the least was observed for Salmetrol (25mcg). The highest cost ratio (5.55) and cost variance (455.454) were observed for Tiotropium Bromide (9 mcg).</p><p><strong>Interpretation and conclusions: </strong>The current study compares the cost difference between the branded Inhalational bronchodilators on the market and Jan Aushadhi generic inhalational bronchodilators. Replacing the costly branded bronchodilators with Jan Aushadhi generic drugs can result in substantial cost savings. By conducting a cost comparison, decision makers can gain insights into the financial implications.</p>","PeriodicalId":47054,"journal":{"name":"Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation","volume":"23 1","pages":"48"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12465999/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Economic evaluation of generic inhalational bronchodilators from the Jan-Aushadi scheme versus branded alternatives.\",\"authors\":\"Jerin James, Neha Pillai Vinod, Mridula Murali Manohar, Rishi Kumaran B\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12962-025-00648-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>In India, the burden of respiratory diseases has brought about a need for the use of inhalational bronchodilators, which often pose a financial strain for a significant portion of the underprivileged population. Hence Jan Aushadhi initiative makes available quality drugs at affordable prices through dedicated stores through-out India. The objective of this study was to perform a cost comparison study of generic inhalational bronchodilators provided through Jan Aushadi pharmacies versus their branded counterparts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The cost of Jan Aushadi drugs and the cost of the most expensive and cheapest marketed branded drugs for the same molecule and dose were ascertained and presented in Indian rupees. The cost difference, cost ratio and cost variance were calculated by comparing the price of Jan Aushadi generic drugs with the most expensive and cheapest branded drugs in the same category.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to branded drugs, all the Jan Aushadi generic drugs were cheaper, except one (SALMETROL). The highest cost difference was observed for Tiotropium Bromide, while the least was observed for Salmetrol (25mcg). The highest cost ratio (5.55) and cost variance (455.454) were observed for Tiotropium Bromide (9 mcg).</p><p><strong>Interpretation and conclusions: </strong>The current study compares the cost difference between the branded Inhalational bronchodilators on the market and Jan Aushadhi generic inhalational bronchodilators. Replacing the costly branded bronchodilators with Jan Aushadhi generic drugs can result in substantial cost savings. By conducting a cost comparison, decision makers can gain insights into the financial implications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47054,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"48\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12465999/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12962-025-00648-2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12962-025-00648-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目标:在印度,呼吸道疾病的负担导致需要使用吸入性支气管扩张剂,这往往给很大一部分贫困人口造成财政压力。因此,Jan Aushadhi倡议通过印度各地的专门商店以可承受的价格提供高质量的药物。本研究的目的是对Jan Aushadi药房提供的非专利吸入性支气管扩张剂与品牌支气管扩张剂进行成本比较研究。方法:以印度卢比为单位,确定Jan Aushadi药品的价格以及相同分子和剂量的最贵和最便宜的市售品牌药品的价格。通过比较Jan Aushadi仿制药与同类最贵和最便宜的品牌药的价格,计算成本差值、成本比和成本方差。结果:与品牌药相比,除SALMETROL外,所有Jan Aushadi仿制药均较便宜。观察到的成本差异最大的是噻托溴铵,而最小的是沙美乐(25mcg)。9 mcg噻托溴铵的成本比(5.55)和成本方差(455.454)最高。解释和结论:目前的研究比较了市场上品牌吸入性支气管扩张剂和Jan Aushadhi通用吸入性支气管扩张剂的成本差异。用Jan Aushadhi仿制药取代昂贵的品牌支气管扩张剂可节省大量成本。通过进行成本比较,决策者可以深入了解财务影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Economic evaluation of generic inhalational bronchodilators from the Jan-Aushadi scheme versus branded alternatives.

Background and objectives: In India, the burden of respiratory diseases has brought about a need for the use of inhalational bronchodilators, which often pose a financial strain for a significant portion of the underprivileged population. Hence Jan Aushadhi initiative makes available quality drugs at affordable prices through dedicated stores through-out India. The objective of this study was to perform a cost comparison study of generic inhalational bronchodilators provided through Jan Aushadi pharmacies versus their branded counterparts.

Methods: The cost of Jan Aushadi drugs and the cost of the most expensive and cheapest marketed branded drugs for the same molecule and dose were ascertained and presented in Indian rupees. The cost difference, cost ratio and cost variance were calculated by comparing the price of Jan Aushadi generic drugs with the most expensive and cheapest branded drugs in the same category.

Results: Compared to branded drugs, all the Jan Aushadi generic drugs were cheaper, except one (SALMETROL). The highest cost difference was observed for Tiotropium Bromide, while the least was observed for Salmetrol (25mcg). The highest cost ratio (5.55) and cost variance (455.454) were observed for Tiotropium Bromide (9 mcg).

Interpretation and conclusions: The current study compares the cost difference between the branded Inhalational bronchodilators on the market and Jan Aushadhi generic inhalational bronchodilators. Replacing the costly branded bronchodilators with Jan Aushadhi generic drugs can result in substantial cost savings. By conducting a cost comparison, decision makers can gain insights into the financial implications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
59
审稿时长
34 weeks
期刊介绍: Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal that considers manuscripts on all aspects of cost-effectiveness analysis, including conceptual or methodological work, economic evaluations, and policy analysis related to resource allocation at a national or international level. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation is aimed at health economists, health services researchers, and policy-makers with an interest in enhancing the flow and transfer of knowledge relating to efficiency in the health sector. Manuscripts are encouraged from researchers based in low- and middle-income countries, with a view to increasing the international economic evidence base for health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信