Renil S Titus, Vatsala Mundra, Eusebio Luna Velasquez, Jiaqiong Xu, Carlos Riveros, Sanjana Ranganathan, Aamuktha Porika, Rohit Reddy, Dharam Kaushik, Janet Kukreja, Roger Li, Christopher J D Wallis, Raj Satkunasivam
{"title":"膀胱癌根治性膀胱切除术患者既往盆腔放疗与手术预后的关系:国家手术质量改进计划靶向膀胱切除术数据库分析","authors":"Renil S Titus, Vatsala Mundra, Eusebio Luna Velasquez, Jiaqiong Xu, Carlos Riveros, Sanjana Ranganathan, Aamuktha Porika, Rohit Reddy, Dharam Kaushik, Janet Kukreja, Roger Li, Christopher J D Wallis, Raj Satkunasivam","doi":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.08.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patients undergoing radical cystectomy (RC) for bladder cancer (BCa) may have previously received pelvic radiotherapy (pRT), which is both a risk factor for BCa and is independently associated with an increased risk of intraoperative and postoperative complications. We sought to quantify this risk at the population level and to assess rates of granular, cystectomy-specific and general surgical outcomes of patients undergoing RC who received pRT for any pelvic malignancy any time prior using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) Targeted Cystectomy database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the ACS-NSQIP targeted cystectomy dataset of patients 18-90 years old who underwent RC for BCa from 2019 to 2022. The primary outcomes included rates of cystectomy-specific outcomes potentially related to pRT (e.g., rectal injury) and 30-day major postoperative outcomes: mortality, reoperation, cardiovascular events, and readmission rates. Secondary outcomes included general surgical complications such as rates of sepsis, surgical-site infections (SSIs), length of hospital stay (LOS) and surgery duration. We balanced for potential confounders by propensity score matching (PSM) with a 1:5 ratio between pRT and no-pRT groups with a caliper of 0.009.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 5,058 patients of whom 403 (7.97%) had pRT prior to RC. After PSM, the analytical cohort consisted of 1,901 RC patients and 387 RC + pRT patients. Prior pRT was associated with significantly higher odds of rectal injury (OR 3.17, 95% CI: 1.59-6.33). Additionally, prior pRT was associated with infectious complications, including SSI (OR 1.48, 95% CI: 1.08-2.39), organ-site infection (OR 1.61, 95% CI: 1.08-2.39). Subgroup analyses suggested the association between prior pRT, and rectal injury was statistically significant among patients with age ≥ 65 years, BMI 25-29.9, open approach for RC and norreceipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a contemporary real-world, multicenter cohort, patients undergoing RC after pRT were associated with 3-fold higher odds of rectal injury, and higher odds of multiple infectious complications. These data provide a framework to assist in patient counseling and optimizing selection.</p>","PeriodicalId":23408,"journal":{"name":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The association between prior pelvic radiotherapy for cancer and surgical outcomes in patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: An analysis of national surgical quality improvement program targeted cystectomy database.\",\"authors\":\"Renil S Titus, Vatsala Mundra, Eusebio Luna Velasquez, Jiaqiong Xu, Carlos Riveros, Sanjana Ranganathan, Aamuktha Porika, Rohit Reddy, Dharam Kaushik, Janet Kukreja, Roger Li, Christopher J D Wallis, Raj Satkunasivam\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.08.016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patients undergoing radical cystectomy (RC) for bladder cancer (BCa) may have previously received pelvic radiotherapy (pRT), which is both a risk factor for BCa and is independently associated with an increased risk of intraoperative and postoperative complications. We sought to quantify this risk at the population level and to assess rates of granular, cystectomy-specific and general surgical outcomes of patients undergoing RC who received pRT for any pelvic malignancy any time prior using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) Targeted Cystectomy database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the ACS-NSQIP targeted cystectomy dataset of patients 18-90 years old who underwent RC for BCa from 2019 to 2022. The primary outcomes included rates of cystectomy-specific outcomes potentially related to pRT (e.g., rectal injury) and 30-day major postoperative outcomes: mortality, reoperation, cardiovascular events, and readmission rates. Secondary outcomes included general surgical complications such as rates of sepsis, surgical-site infections (SSIs), length of hospital stay (LOS) and surgery duration. We balanced for potential confounders by propensity score matching (PSM) with a 1:5 ratio between pRT and no-pRT groups with a caliper of 0.009.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 5,058 patients of whom 403 (7.97%) had pRT prior to RC. After PSM, the analytical cohort consisted of 1,901 RC patients and 387 RC + pRT patients. Prior pRT was associated with significantly higher odds of rectal injury (OR 3.17, 95% CI: 1.59-6.33). Additionally, prior pRT was associated with infectious complications, including SSI (OR 1.48, 95% CI: 1.08-2.39), organ-site infection (OR 1.61, 95% CI: 1.08-2.39). Subgroup analyses suggested the association between prior pRT, and rectal injury was statistically significant among patients with age ≥ 65 years, BMI 25-29.9, open approach for RC and norreceipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a contemporary real-world, multicenter cohort, patients undergoing RC after pRT were associated with 3-fold higher odds of rectal injury, and higher odds of multiple infectious complications. These data provide a framework to assist in patient counseling and optimizing selection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23408,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.08.016\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.08.016","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The association between prior pelvic radiotherapy for cancer and surgical outcomes in patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: An analysis of national surgical quality improvement program targeted cystectomy database.
Introduction: Patients undergoing radical cystectomy (RC) for bladder cancer (BCa) may have previously received pelvic radiotherapy (pRT), which is both a risk factor for BCa and is independently associated with an increased risk of intraoperative and postoperative complications. We sought to quantify this risk at the population level and to assess rates of granular, cystectomy-specific and general surgical outcomes of patients undergoing RC who received pRT for any pelvic malignancy any time prior using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) Targeted Cystectomy database.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the ACS-NSQIP targeted cystectomy dataset of patients 18-90 years old who underwent RC for BCa from 2019 to 2022. The primary outcomes included rates of cystectomy-specific outcomes potentially related to pRT (e.g., rectal injury) and 30-day major postoperative outcomes: mortality, reoperation, cardiovascular events, and readmission rates. Secondary outcomes included general surgical complications such as rates of sepsis, surgical-site infections (SSIs), length of hospital stay (LOS) and surgery duration. We balanced for potential confounders by propensity score matching (PSM) with a 1:5 ratio between pRT and no-pRT groups with a caliper of 0.009.
Results: We identified 5,058 patients of whom 403 (7.97%) had pRT prior to RC. After PSM, the analytical cohort consisted of 1,901 RC patients and 387 RC + pRT patients. Prior pRT was associated with significantly higher odds of rectal injury (OR 3.17, 95% CI: 1.59-6.33). Additionally, prior pRT was associated with infectious complications, including SSI (OR 1.48, 95% CI: 1.08-2.39), organ-site infection (OR 1.61, 95% CI: 1.08-2.39). Subgroup analyses suggested the association between prior pRT, and rectal injury was statistically significant among patients with age ≥ 65 years, BMI 25-29.9, open approach for RC and norreceipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Conclusions: In a contemporary real-world, multicenter cohort, patients undergoing RC after pRT were associated with 3-fold higher odds of rectal injury, and higher odds of multiple infectious complications. These data provide a framework to assist in patient counseling and optimizing selection.
期刊介绍:
Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations is the official journal of the Society of Urologic Oncology. The journal publishes practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science research articles which address any aspect of urologic oncology. Each issue comprises original research, news and topics, survey articles providing short commentaries on other important articles in the urologic oncology literature, and reviews including an in-depth Seminar examining a specific clinical dilemma. The journal periodically publishes supplement issues devoted to areas of current interest to the urologic oncology community. Articles published are of interest to researchers and the clinicians involved in the practice of urologic oncology including urologists, oncologists, and radiologists.