在转移性激素敏感前列腺癌的标准治疗中加入雄激素受体途径抑制剂:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Brigida Anna Maiorano, Chiara Mercinelli, Antonio Cigliola, Valentina Tateo, Giorgio Gandaglia, Alberto Briganti, Francesco Montorsi, Andrea Necchi
{"title":"在转移性激素敏感前列腺癌的标准治疗中加入雄激素受体途径抑制剂:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Brigida Anna Maiorano, Chiara Mercinelli, Antonio Cigliola, Valentina Tateo, Giorgio Gandaglia, Alberto Briganti, Francesco Montorsi, Andrea Necchi","doi":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.08.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To evaluate activity, safety and nuances of androgen-receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPI) with standard-of-care therapy (SOC), i.e., androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) alone or with docetaxel, for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). Several randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have evaluated different agents in this setting. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to better define the benefits and risks of combining ARPI with SOC in mHSPC. A comprehensive literature search of MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and meeting abstracts from the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) was performed in April 2025. The study adhered to PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Overall survival (OS) was the primary endpoint, with progression-free survival (PFS), time-to-progression of pain and PSA, and safety as secondary endpoints. Summary hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated for survival outcomes, and risk ratios (RRs) for safety. Random- or fixed-effects models were applied based on study heterogeneity. Eight RCTs fulfilled the prespecified inclusion criteria. The combination of ARPI and SOC significantly improved OS (HR = 0.74; P < 0.00001) and PFS (HR = 0.50 for clinical PFS, HR = 0.49 for radiological PFS; P < 0.0001) compared to the SOC. The benefit was confirmed excluding docetaxel. We did not show heterogeneity among treatment efficacy and disease burden, onset timing or treatment strategy. Adverse events (AEs) were not increased after adding ARPI to SOC, except from hypertension and any grade cardiac AEs. This meta-analysis supports the addition of ARPI to SOC in mHSPC, significantly improving survival outcomes. Uncertainties persist regarding the role of triple therapies including docetaxel. Identifying prognostic and predictive biomarkers is critical to tailoring therapy for patients most likely to benefit from different approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":23408,"journal":{"name":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Addition of androgen-receptor pathway inhibitors to standard of care in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Brigida Anna Maiorano, Chiara Mercinelli, Antonio Cigliola, Valentina Tateo, Giorgio Gandaglia, Alberto Briganti, Francesco Montorsi, Andrea Necchi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.08.017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To evaluate activity, safety and nuances of androgen-receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPI) with standard-of-care therapy (SOC), i.e., androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) alone or with docetaxel, for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). Several randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have evaluated different agents in this setting. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to better define the benefits and risks of combining ARPI with SOC in mHSPC. A comprehensive literature search of MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and meeting abstracts from the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) was performed in April 2025. The study adhered to PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Overall survival (OS) was the primary endpoint, with progression-free survival (PFS), time-to-progression of pain and PSA, and safety as secondary endpoints. Summary hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated for survival outcomes, and risk ratios (RRs) for safety. Random- or fixed-effects models were applied based on study heterogeneity. Eight RCTs fulfilled the prespecified inclusion criteria. The combination of ARPI and SOC significantly improved OS (HR = 0.74; P < 0.00001) and PFS (HR = 0.50 for clinical PFS, HR = 0.49 for radiological PFS; P < 0.0001) compared to the SOC. The benefit was confirmed excluding docetaxel. We did not show heterogeneity among treatment efficacy and disease burden, onset timing or treatment strategy. Adverse events (AEs) were not increased after adding ARPI to SOC, except from hypertension and any grade cardiac AEs. This meta-analysis supports the addition of ARPI to SOC in mHSPC, significantly improving survival outcomes. Uncertainties persist regarding the role of triple therapies including docetaxel. Identifying prognostic and predictive biomarkers is critical to tailoring therapy for patients most likely to benefit from different approaches.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23408,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.08.017\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.08.017","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

评估雄激素受体途径抑制剂(ARPI)与标准治疗(SOC)(即雄激素剥夺治疗(ADT)单独或与多西紫杉醇联合)治疗转移性激素敏感性前列腺癌(mHSPC)的活性、安全性和细微差别。几项随机临床试验(rct)评估了在这种情况下不同的药物。我们进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,以更好地定义mHSPC中ARPI与SOC联合治疗的获益和风险。我们于2025年4月对MEDLINE/PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus以及来自美国临床肿瘤学会(ASCO)和欧洲肿瘤医学学会(ESMO)的会议摘要进行了全面的文献检索。该研究遵循PRISMA指南进行系统评价和荟萃分析。总生存期(OS)是主要终点,无进展生存期(PFS)、疼痛和PSA的进展时间以及安全性是次要终点。计算生存结果的总风险比(hr)和安全性的风险比(rr)。基于研究异质性,采用随机或固定效应模型。8项rct符合预定的纳入标准。与SOC相比,ARPI联合SOC显著改善了OS (HR = 0.74, P < 0.00001)和PFS(临床PFS HR = 0.50,放射学PFS HR = 0.49, P < 0.0001)。排除多西紫杉醇后证实获益。我们没有发现治疗效果、疾病负担、发病时间或治疗策略之间存在异质性。除了高血压和任何级别的心脏不良事件外,在SOC中加入ARPI后不良事件(ae)并未增加。该荟萃分析支持mHSPC患者在SOC中加入ARPI,显著改善生存结果。包括多西紫杉醇在内的三联疗法的作用仍然存在不确定性。确定预后和预测性生物标志物对于为最有可能从不同方法中获益的患者定制治疗至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Addition of androgen-receptor pathway inhibitors to standard of care in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

To evaluate activity, safety and nuances of androgen-receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPI) with standard-of-care therapy (SOC), i.e., androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) alone or with docetaxel, for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). Several randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have evaluated different agents in this setting. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to better define the benefits and risks of combining ARPI with SOC in mHSPC. A comprehensive literature search of MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and meeting abstracts from the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) was performed in April 2025. The study adhered to PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Overall survival (OS) was the primary endpoint, with progression-free survival (PFS), time-to-progression of pain and PSA, and safety as secondary endpoints. Summary hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated for survival outcomes, and risk ratios (RRs) for safety. Random- or fixed-effects models were applied based on study heterogeneity. Eight RCTs fulfilled the prespecified inclusion criteria. The combination of ARPI and SOC significantly improved OS (HR = 0.74; P < 0.00001) and PFS (HR = 0.50 for clinical PFS, HR = 0.49 for radiological PFS; P < 0.0001) compared to the SOC. The benefit was confirmed excluding docetaxel. We did not show heterogeneity among treatment efficacy and disease burden, onset timing or treatment strategy. Adverse events (AEs) were not increased after adding ARPI to SOC, except from hypertension and any grade cardiac AEs. This meta-analysis supports the addition of ARPI to SOC in mHSPC, significantly improving survival outcomes. Uncertainties persist regarding the role of triple therapies including docetaxel. Identifying prognostic and predictive biomarkers is critical to tailoring therapy for patients most likely to benefit from different approaches.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
7.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations is the official journal of the Society of Urologic Oncology. The journal publishes practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science research articles which address any aspect of urologic oncology. Each issue comprises original research, news and topics, survey articles providing short commentaries on other important articles in the urologic oncology literature, and reviews including an in-depth Seminar examining a specific clinical dilemma. The journal periodically publishes supplement issues devoted to areas of current interest to the urologic oncology community. Articles published are of interest to researchers and the clinicians involved in the practice of urologic oncology including urologists, oncologists, and radiologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信