晚期前列腺癌患者再次行睾丸切除术——可行吗?

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Alon Lazarovich, Walter M Stadler, Scott Eggener, Samuel Tremblay, Ashley Page, Hilda Diaz, Brian Heiss, Daniel M Geynisman, Natalie Reizine
{"title":"晚期前列腺癌患者再次行睾丸切除术——可行吗?","authors":"Alon Lazarovich, Walter M Stadler, Scott Eggener, Samuel Tremblay, Ashley Page, Hilda Diaz, Brian Heiss, Daniel M Geynisman, Natalie Reizine","doi":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.08.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background & objectives: </strong>Lifelong androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is necessary for men with advanced prostate cancer (PCa). ADT via medical castration carries with it financial and physical toxicity. This feasibility trial evaluates the acceptance rate of surgical orchiectomy among men with metastatic PCa, assessing its viability as an alternative to ongoing medical castration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective trial of PCa patients from 3 academic medical centers, who had been on ADT for at least 1 year. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients opting for surgical orchiectomy following an educational session regarding the procedure. Secondary endpoints included participation rates in the educational session, the correlation of orchiectomy acceptance with demographic factors, the impact on quality of life metrics (sexual satisfaction, body image perception) and decision regret scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 130 men approached, 101 (78%) consented to the educational session, and 58/101 (57%) consented for quality of life assessments. 27/101 (27%) consulted with a urologist about orchiectomy, and 14/101 (14%) ultimately underwent the procedure. Quality of life outcomes showed no difference between those who underwent orchiectomy and those who did not. Decision regret among orchiectomy patients was low with 93% indicating that orchiectomy was the right decision. Testicular atrophy was observed on pathology in 13 patients who underwent orchiectomy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found a limited acceptance rate of 14% for surgical orchiectomy among men with PCa on ADT for at least 1 year, who were educated on the procedure.</p>","PeriodicalId":23408,"journal":{"name":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The comeback of orchiectomy in advanced prostate cancer- is that feasible?\",\"authors\":\"Alon Lazarovich, Walter M Stadler, Scott Eggener, Samuel Tremblay, Ashley Page, Hilda Diaz, Brian Heiss, Daniel M Geynisman, Natalie Reizine\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.08.025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background & objectives: </strong>Lifelong androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is necessary for men with advanced prostate cancer (PCa). ADT via medical castration carries with it financial and physical toxicity. This feasibility trial evaluates the acceptance rate of surgical orchiectomy among men with metastatic PCa, assessing its viability as an alternative to ongoing medical castration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective trial of PCa patients from 3 academic medical centers, who had been on ADT for at least 1 year. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients opting for surgical orchiectomy following an educational session regarding the procedure. Secondary endpoints included participation rates in the educational session, the correlation of orchiectomy acceptance with demographic factors, the impact on quality of life metrics (sexual satisfaction, body image perception) and decision regret scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 130 men approached, 101 (78%) consented to the educational session, and 58/101 (57%) consented for quality of life assessments. 27/101 (27%) consulted with a urologist about orchiectomy, and 14/101 (14%) ultimately underwent the procedure. Quality of life outcomes showed no difference between those who underwent orchiectomy and those who did not. Decision regret among orchiectomy patients was low with 93% indicating that orchiectomy was the right decision. Testicular atrophy was observed on pathology in 13 patients who underwent orchiectomy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found a limited acceptance rate of 14% for surgical orchiectomy among men with PCa on ADT for at least 1 year, who were educated on the procedure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23408,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.08.025\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.08.025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:晚期前列腺癌(PCa)患者需要终身雄激素剥夺治疗(ADT)。通过医学阉割进行的ADT具有经济和物理毒性。本可行性试验评估转移性前列腺癌男性手术睾丸切除术的接受率,评估其作为持续药物阉割的替代方案的可行性。方法:我们对来自3个学术医疗中心的接受ADT治疗至少1年的PCa患者进行了一项前瞻性试验。主要终点是在接受了有关手术的教育课程后选择手术切除的患者比例。次要终点包括教育课程的参与率、睾丸切除术接受度与人口统计学因素的相关性、对生活质量指标(性满意度、身体形象感知)的影响和决策后悔量表。结果:在接触的130名男性中,101名(78%)同意接受教育课程,58名(57%)同意接受生活质量评估。27/101(27%)咨询了泌尿科医生的睾丸切除术,14/101(14%)最终接受了手术。生活质量结果显示,接受睾丸切除术的患者和未接受睾丸切除术的患者之间没有差异。睾丸切除术患者的决定后悔率较低,93%的患者认为睾丸切除术是正确的决定。13例行睾丸切除术的患者病理观察到睾丸萎缩。结论:我们发现,接受ADT治疗至少1年的男性前列腺癌患者接受手术切除的有限接受率为14%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The comeback of orchiectomy in advanced prostate cancer- is that feasible?

Background & objectives: Lifelong androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is necessary for men with advanced prostate cancer (PCa). ADT via medical castration carries with it financial and physical toxicity. This feasibility trial evaluates the acceptance rate of surgical orchiectomy among men with metastatic PCa, assessing its viability as an alternative to ongoing medical castration.

Methods: We conducted a prospective trial of PCa patients from 3 academic medical centers, who had been on ADT for at least 1 year. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients opting for surgical orchiectomy following an educational session regarding the procedure. Secondary endpoints included participation rates in the educational session, the correlation of orchiectomy acceptance with demographic factors, the impact on quality of life metrics (sexual satisfaction, body image perception) and decision regret scale.

Results: Of the 130 men approached, 101 (78%) consented to the educational session, and 58/101 (57%) consented for quality of life assessments. 27/101 (27%) consulted with a urologist about orchiectomy, and 14/101 (14%) ultimately underwent the procedure. Quality of life outcomes showed no difference between those who underwent orchiectomy and those who did not. Decision regret among orchiectomy patients was low with 93% indicating that orchiectomy was the right decision. Testicular atrophy was observed on pathology in 13 patients who underwent orchiectomy.

Conclusion: We found a limited acceptance rate of 14% for surgical orchiectomy among men with PCa on ADT for at least 1 year, who were educated on the procedure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
7.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations is the official journal of the Society of Urologic Oncology. The journal publishes practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science research articles which address any aspect of urologic oncology. Each issue comprises original research, news and topics, survey articles providing short commentaries on other important articles in the urologic oncology literature, and reviews including an in-depth Seminar examining a specific clinical dilemma. The journal periodically publishes supplement issues devoted to areas of current interest to the urologic oncology community. Articles published are of interest to researchers and the clinicians involved in the practice of urologic oncology including urologists, oncologists, and radiologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信