Kavita Jain, Shruthi R Perati, Louis F Chai, Hanna Labiner, David Millner, Ray Ramirez, Veena Bhagavathi, Avik Sarkar, Daniel L Feingold, Kristen Donohue, Nell Maloney Patel
{"title":"内镜下处理左侧结肠切除术和一期结肠吻合术后吻合口渗漏:一项单一机构的回顾性回顾。","authors":"Kavita Jain, Shruthi R Perati, Louis F Chai, Hanna Labiner, David Millner, Ray Ramirez, Veena Bhagavathi, Avik Sarkar, Daniel L Feingold, Kristen Donohue, Nell Maloney Patel","doi":"10.1177/15533506251381980","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundPostoperative anastomotic leaks are the most common complications following colorectal surgery, with rates reaching 24%. Previous studies on endoscopic management of anastomotic leaks (eg, EndoClip, OverStitch, and stenting) have shown similar outcomes as reoperation. Implementation of these endoscopic strategies for anastomotic leak management remains limited given sparse data demonstrating integration of these methods with conventional practices.MethodsA single-institution, retrospective chart review was conducted to identify patients who underwent a left-sided colectomy with primary colorectal anastomosis and developed clinically significant anastomotic leaks between 2018 and 2021. These patients were categorized as managed with surgery alone vs with endoscopic intervention, and patient demographics and anastomotic leak characteristics were analyzed.ResultsOf the 14 total patients identified, seven were managed with surgery alone and seven were managed with endoscopic intervention. When compared to patients managed with surgery alone, those managed endoscopically were more often hemodynamically normal; however, differences in bowel defect size or time to leak identification were not statistically significant. In three cases, the application of advanced endoscopic techniques prevented the need for further intervention. For three other patients, multidisciplinary management with endoscopy facilitated surgical creation of diverting loop ileostomy instead of a higher-morbidity end colostomy.ConclusionsThis study demonstrates a diversity of scenarios in which endoscopic management can be integrated into management of anastomotic leaks and, in some cases, avoid the need for reoperation. When feasible, a multidisciplinary approach including interventional gastroenterology should be utilized to potentially mitigate the need for end colostomy creation and optimize patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":22095,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Innovation","volume":" ","pages":"15533506251381980"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endoscopic Management of Anastomotic Leaks Following Left-Sided Colectomy and Primary Colorectal Anastomosis: A Single-Institution Retrospective Review.\",\"authors\":\"Kavita Jain, Shruthi R Perati, Louis F Chai, Hanna Labiner, David Millner, Ray Ramirez, Veena Bhagavathi, Avik Sarkar, Daniel L Feingold, Kristen Donohue, Nell Maloney Patel\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15533506251381980\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundPostoperative anastomotic leaks are the most common complications following colorectal surgery, with rates reaching 24%. Previous studies on endoscopic management of anastomotic leaks (eg, EndoClip, OverStitch, and stenting) have shown similar outcomes as reoperation. Implementation of these endoscopic strategies for anastomotic leak management remains limited given sparse data demonstrating integration of these methods with conventional practices.MethodsA single-institution, retrospective chart review was conducted to identify patients who underwent a left-sided colectomy with primary colorectal anastomosis and developed clinically significant anastomotic leaks between 2018 and 2021. These patients were categorized as managed with surgery alone vs with endoscopic intervention, and patient demographics and anastomotic leak characteristics were analyzed.ResultsOf the 14 total patients identified, seven were managed with surgery alone and seven were managed with endoscopic intervention. When compared to patients managed with surgery alone, those managed endoscopically were more often hemodynamically normal; however, differences in bowel defect size or time to leak identification were not statistically significant. In three cases, the application of advanced endoscopic techniques prevented the need for further intervention. For three other patients, multidisciplinary management with endoscopy facilitated surgical creation of diverting loop ileostomy instead of a higher-morbidity end colostomy.ConclusionsThis study demonstrates a diversity of scenarios in which endoscopic management can be integrated into management of anastomotic leaks and, in some cases, avoid the need for reoperation. When feasible, a multidisciplinary approach including interventional gastroenterology should be utilized to potentially mitigate the need for end colostomy creation and optimize patient outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22095,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical Innovation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"15533506251381980\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical Innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15533506251381980\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15533506251381980","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Endoscopic Management of Anastomotic Leaks Following Left-Sided Colectomy and Primary Colorectal Anastomosis: A Single-Institution Retrospective Review.
BackgroundPostoperative anastomotic leaks are the most common complications following colorectal surgery, with rates reaching 24%. Previous studies on endoscopic management of anastomotic leaks (eg, EndoClip, OverStitch, and stenting) have shown similar outcomes as reoperation. Implementation of these endoscopic strategies for anastomotic leak management remains limited given sparse data demonstrating integration of these methods with conventional practices.MethodsA single-institution, retrospective chart review was conducted to identify patients who underwent a left-sided colectomy with primary colorectal anastomosis and developed clinically significant anastomotic leaks between 2018 and 2021. These patients were categorized as managed with surgery alone vs with endoscopic intervention, and patient demographics and anastomotic leak characteristics were analyzed.ResultsOf the 14 total patients identified, seven were managed with surgery alone and seven were managed with endoscopic intervention. When compared to patients managed with surgery alone, those managed endoscopically were more often hemodynamically normal; however, differences in bowel defect size or time to leak identification were not statistically significant. In three cases, the application of advanced endoscopic techniques prevented the need for further intervention. For three other patients, multidisciplinary management with endoscopy facilitated surgical creation of diverting loop ileostomy instead of a higher-morbidity end colostomy.ConclusionsThis study demonstrates a diversity of scenarios in which endoscopic management can be integrated into management of anastomotic leaks and, in some cases, avoid the need for reoperation. When feasible, a multidisciplinary approach including interventional gastroenterology should be utilized to potentially mitigate the need for end colostomy creation and optimize patient outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Surgical Innovation (SRI) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal focusing on minimally invasive surgical techniques, new instruments such as laparoscopes and endoscopes, and new technologies. SRI prepares surgeons to think and work in "the operating room of the future" through learning new techniques, understanding and adapting to new technologies, maintaining surgical competencies, and applying surgical outcomes data to their practices. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).