在肝移植之前还是之后进行手术更安全?结直肠癌和小肠手术的病例匹配研究。

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Phil Meister, Roxana Pantea, Samira Vestweber, Marc A Reschke, Ulf Neumann, Andreas D Rink
{"title":"在肝移植之前还是之后进行手术更安全?结直肠癌和小肠手术的病例匹配研究。","authors":"Phil Meister, Roxana Pantea, Samira Vestweber, Marc A Reschke, Ulf Neumann, Andreas D Rink","doi":"10.1007/s00423-025-03858-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Surgical risks are elevated in both patients with cirrhosis and in liver transplant recipients. We aimed to quantify surgical outcomes in comparable patients and procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This case-control study included liver transplant recipients and cirrhosis patients who underwent small bowel or colorectal surgery. Patients were matched based on Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) (± 1), age (± 5 years), and surgical modality. In-hospital mortality, length of hospital stay (LOS), and major morbidity (Dindo-Clavien grade ≥ 3) were used as outcome criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>45 cirrhosis and 45 matched transplant patients were included. Mean age and CCI were 65 years and 6.3, respectively. 38% of all patients underwent emergency surgery. Mortality was significantly higher in the cirrhosis group (38% vs. 11%, p = 0.003). Stratification of cirrhosis patients by MELD revealed no significant difference between patients with MELD ≤ 14 and transplant recipients. However, patients with MELD > 14 exhibited substantially increased mortality (64% vs. 9%, p = 0.07, ns).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Colorectal and small bowel surgery in both cirrhosis and transplant patients carries significant risks. Mortality was significantly higher in cirrhosis patients overall, but data suggests the risk of surgery in cirrhosis patients with MELD scores ≤ 14 might be comparable to transplant patients, while those with MELD scores > 14 are at particular risk. Small sample size and heterogeneity of procedures limit these findings; still, the necessity of surgery in patients with higher MELD should be carefully evaluated, as delaying surgery until after liver transplantation may be safer. WHAT DOES THIS PAPER ADD TO LITERATURE? : This paper contains the largest case-matched comparison of surgery in cirrhosis patients with liver transplant patients. We quantify the risk for small bowel and colorectal surgery in comparable patients for the first time, to assist clinical decision of potentially delaying surgery until after liver transplantation.</p>","PeriodicalId":17983,"journal":{"name":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","volume":"410 1","pages":"280"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12476395/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is it safer to perform surgery before or after liver transplantation? A case-match study for colorectal and small-bowel surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Phil Meister, Roxana Pantea, Samira Vestweber, Marc A Reschke, Ulf Neumann, Andreas D Rink\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00423-025-03858-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Surgical risks are elevated in both patients with cirrhosis and in liver transplant recipients. We aimed to quantify surgical outcomes in comparable patients and procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This case-control study included liver transplant recipients and cirrhosis patients who underwent small bowel or colorectal surgery. Patients were matched based on Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) (± 1), age (± 5 years), and surgical modality. In-hospital mortality, length of hospital stay (LOS), and major morbidity (Dindo-Clavien grade ≥ 3) were used as outcome criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>45 cirrhosis and 45 matched transplant patients were included. Mean age and CCI were 65 years and 6.3, respectively. 38% of all patients underwent emergency surgery. Mortality was significantly higher in the cirrhosis group (38% vs. 11%, p = 0.003). Stratification of cirrhosis patients by MELD revealed no significant difference between patients with MELD ≤ 14 and transplant recipients. However, patients with MELD > 14 exhibited substantially increased mortality (64% vs. 9%, p = 0.07, ns).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Colorectal and small bowel surgery in both cirrhosis and transplant patients carries significant risks. Mortality was significantly higher in cirrhosis patients overall, but data suggests the risk of surgery in cirrhosis patients with MELD scores ≤ 14 might be comparable to transplant patients, while those with MELD scores > 14 are at particular risk. Small sample size and heterogeneity of procedures limit these findings; still, the necessity of surgery in patients with higher MELD should be carefully evaluated, as delaying surgery until after liver transplantation may be safer. WHAT DOES THIS PAPER ADD TO LITERATURE? : This paper contains the largest case-matched comparison of surgery in cirrhosis patients with liver transplant patients. We quantify the risk for small bowel and colorectal surgery in comparable patients for the first time, to assist clinical decision of potentially delaying surgery until after liver transplantation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17983,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery\",\"volume\":\"410 1\",\"pages\":\"280\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12476395/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-025-03858-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-025-03858-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:肝硬化患者和肝移植受者手术风险升高。我们的目的是量化比较患者和手术过程的手术结果。方法:本病例对照研究纳入肝移植受者和接受小肠或结直肠手术的肝硬化患者。根据Charlson合并症指数(±1)、年龄(±5岁)和手术方式对患者进行匹配。住院死亡率、住院时间(LOS)和主要发病率(Dindo-Clavien分级≥3)作为结局标准。结果:纳入45例肝硬化患者和45例匹配移植患者。平均年龄65岁,CCI 6.3岁。38%的患者接受了紧急手术。肝硬化组的死亡率明显更高(38%比11%,p = 0.003)。MELD对肝硬化患者的分层显示,MELD≤14的患者与移植受者之间无显著差异。然而,MELD bbb14患者的死亡率显著增加(64% vs. 9%, p = 0.07, ns)。结论:肝硬化和移植患者行结肠直肠和小肠手术存在显著风险。总的来说,肝硬化患者的死亡率明显更高,但数据表明,MELD评分≤14的肝硬化患者的手术风险可能与移植患者相当,而MELD评分为> - 14的患者风险特别高。小样本量和程序的异质性限制了这些发现;尽管如此,对于MELD较高的患者,手术的必要性仍应仔细评估,因为延迟手术至肝移植后可能更安全。这篇论文为文学增添了什么?:这篇论文包含了最大的肝硬化患者与肝移植患者的手术配对比较。我们首次量化了可比患者进行小肠和结直肠手术的风险,以协助临床决定是否将手术推迟到肝移植后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is it safer to perform surgery before or after liver transplantation? A case-match study for colorectal and small-bowel surgery.

Aims: Surgical risks are elevated in both patients with cirrhosis and in liver transplant recipients. We aimed to quantify surgical outcomes in comparable patients and procedures.

Methods: This case-control study included liver transplant recipients and cirrhosis patients who underwent small bowel or colorectal surgery. Patients were matched based on Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) (± 1), age (± 5 years), and surgical modality. In-hospital mortality, length of hospital stay (LOS), and major morbidity (Dindo-Clavien grade ≥ 3) were used as outcome criteria.

Results: 45 cirrhosis and 45 matched transplant patients were included. Mean age and CCI were 65 years and 6.3, respectively. 38% of all patients underwent emergency surgery. Mortality was significantly higher in the cirrhosis group (38% vs. 11%, p = 0.003). Stratification of cirrhosis patients by MELD revealed no significant difference between patients with MELD ≤ 14 and transplant recipients. However, patients with MELD > 14 exhibited substantially increased mortality (64% vs. 9%, p = 0.07, ns).

Conclusions: Colorectal and small bowel surgery in both cirrhosis and transplant patients carries significant risks. Mortality was significantly higher in cirrhosis patients overall, but data suggests the risk of surgery in cirrhosis patients with MELD scores ≤ 14 might be comparable to transplant patients, while those with MELD scores > 14 are at particular risk. Small sample size and heterogeneity of procedures limit these findings; still, the necessity of surgery in patients with higher MELD should be carefully evaluated, as delaying surgery until after liver transplantation may be safer. WHAT DOES THIS PAPER ADD TO LITERATURE? : This paper contains the largest case-matched comparison of surgery in cirrhosis patients with liver transplant patients. We quantify the risk for small bowel and colorectal surgery in comparable patients for the first time, to assist clinical decision of potentially delaying surgery until after liver transplantation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
8.70%
发文量
342
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Langenbeck''s Archives of Surgery aims to publish the best results in the field of clinical surgery and basic surgical research. The main focus is on providing the highest level of clinical research and clinically relevant basic research. The journal, published exclusively in English, will provide an international discussion forum for the controlled results of clinical surgery. The majority of published contributions will be original articles reporting on clinical data from general and visceral surgery, while endocrine surgery will also be covered. Papers on basic surgical principles from the fields of traumatology, vascular and thoracic surgery are also welcome. Evidence-based medicine is an important criterion for the acceptance of papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信