用于脊髓损伤患者辅助行走的twice动力外骨骼的安全性评估和可行性。

IF 5.2 2区 医学 Q1 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Carina Lang, Inge Eriks-Hoogland, Claudio Perret, Mohamed Bouri, Mario Widmer
{"title":"用于脊髓损伤患者辅助行走的twice动力外骨骼的安全性评估和可行性。","authors":"Carina Lang, Inge Eriks-Hoogland, Claudio Perret, Mohamed Bouri, Mario Widmer","doi":"10.1186/s12984-025-01727-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Following spinal cord injury (SCI), powered exoskeletons have been shown to enable assisted walking and may also positively impact secondary health conditions. The TWIICE exoskeleton is intended to enable individuals with SCI to train at home or in community during their activities of daily living under the supervision of a therapist. The aim of this pilot clinical trial was to assess the safety and feasibility of the TWIICE powered exoskeleton for assisted ambulation in a clinical setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-arm, open label feasibility study included 5 non-ambulatory individuals at least 6 months after onset of traumatic or non-traumatic SCI. Participants used the TWIICE exoskeleton during 6 sessions in the therapy premises of a Swiss SCI-specialized clinic undergoing a progressive mobility training. The incidence of adverse device effects (ADEs) was the primary outcome. In addition, standard walking tests such as 10 m Walk Test (10MWT), 6-minute Walk Test (6MWT), and Timed Up and Go (TUG) were performed using the device during the final session to evaluate usability after short-term training. Data are presented as median (range).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We recruited 5 non-ambulatory individuals with SCI (2 females / 3 males, 32 (21-45) years of age). Four participants were motor complete (T6-T11) and 1 was motor incomplete (C7). Of the 10 adverse events occurring over the course of the 30 cumulative sessions, 4 were categorized as ADEs: reddening of the skin at contact points with the device (2x), transient intensification of neuropathic pain, and transient increase of spasticity. All ADEs subsided after a short time and without any sequelae. After 6 sessions, participants walked the 10MWT in 33 (24-144) seconds and were able to achieve 98 (37-137) meters during a 6MWT while using the device. Finally, the TUG was performed with the device and moderate assistance in 103 (61-135) seconds.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>No serious safety concerns were identified during this feasibility study in a clinical setting. After 6 sessions, our relatively young and fit study population showed a variable but generally good performance in clinical measures when compared to reports on commercialized powered exoskeletons.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05926310.</p>","PeriodicalId":16384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation","volume":"22 1","pages":"194"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12465450/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety assessment and feasibility of the TWIICE powered exoskeleton for assisted ambulation in individuals with spinal cord injury.\",\"authors\":\"Carina Lang, Inge Eriks-Hoogland, Claudio Perret, Mohamed Bouri, Mario Widmer\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12984-025-01727-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Following spinal cord injury (SCI), powered exoskeletons have been shown to enable assisted walking and may also positively impact secondary health conditions. The TWIICE exoskeleton is intended to enable individuals with SCI to train at home or in community during their activities of daily living under the supervision of a therapist. The aim of this pilot clinical trial was to assess the safety and feasibility of the TWIICE powered exoskeleton for assisted ambulation in a clinical setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-arm, open label feasibility study included 5 non-ambulatory individuals at least 6 months after onset of traumatic or non-traumatic SCI. Participants used the TWIICE exoskeleton during 6 sessions in the therapy premises of a Swiss SCI-specialized clinic undergoing a progressive mobility training. The incidence of adverse device effects (ADEs) was the primary outcome. In addition, standard walking tests such as 10 m Walk Test (10MWT), 6-minute Walk Test (6MWT), and Timed Up and Go (TUG) were performed using the device during the final session to evaluate usability after short-term training. Data are presented as median (range).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We recruited 5 non-ambulatory individuals with SCI (2 females / 3 males, 32 (21-45) years of age). Four participants were motor complete (T6-T11) and 1 was motor incomplete (C7). Of the 10 adverse events occurring over the course of the 30 cumulative sessions, 4 were categorized as ADEs: reddening of the skin at contact points with the device (2x), transient intensification of neuropathic pain, and transient increase of spasticity. All ADEs subsided after a short time and without any sequelae. After 6 sessions, participants walked the 10MWT in 33 (24-144) seconds and were able to achieve 98 (37-137) meters during a 6MWT while using the device. Finally, the TUG was performed with the device and moderate assistance in 103 (61-135) seconds.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>No serious safety concerns were identified during this feasibility study in a clinical setting. After 6 sessions, our relatively young and fit study population showed a variable but generally good performance in clinical measures when compared to reports on commercialized powered exoskeletons.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05926310.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"194\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12465450/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-025-01727-4\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-025-01727-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:脊髓损伤(SCI)后,动力外骨骼已被证明能够辅助行走,并可能对继发性健康状况产生积极影响。twice外骨骼旨在使SCI患者能够在治疗师的监督下在家中或社区进行日常生活活动的训练。该试点临床试验的目的是评估在临床环境中使用twice动力外骨骼辅助行走的安全性和可行性。方法:这项单臂、开放标签可行性研究包括5名创伤性或非创伤性脊髓损伤发病后至少6个月的非活动个体。参与者在瑞士sci专业诊所的治疗场所进行渐进式活动训练的6次疗程中使用了twice外骨骼。器械不良反应(ADEs)发生率是主要观察指标。此外,在最后阶段使用该设备进行10米步行测试(10MWT)、6分钟步行测试(6MWT)和计时行走测试(TUG)等标准步行测试,以评估短期训练后的可用性。数据以中位数(范围)表示。结果:我们招募了5名不能走动的脊髓损伤患者(2女3男,32岁(21-45岁))。4名参与者运动完全(T6-T11), 1名参与者运动不完全(C7)。在30个累积疗程的过程中发生的10个不良事件中,4个被归类为ade:与装置接触点皮肤发红(2x),神经性疼痛的短暂性强化,痉挛的短暂性增加。所有不良反应均在短时间内消退,无任何后遗症。6次训练后,参与者在33秒(24-144秒)内走完10MWT,在使用该设备的情况下,在6MWT中可以走98米(37-137米)。最后,在103(61-135)秒内使用该装置和适度辅助完成TUG。结论:在临床可行性研究中,没有发现严重的安全问题。6个疗程后,与商业化动力外骨骼的报告相比,我们相对年轻和健康的研究人群在临床测量中表现出不同但总体上良好的表现。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05926310。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Safety assessment and feasibility of the TWIICE powered exoskeleton for assisted ambulation in individuals with spinal cord injury.

Background: Following spinal cord injury (SCI), powered exoskeletons have been shown to enable assisted walking and may also positively impact secondary health conditions. The TWIICE exoskeleton is intended to enable individuals with SCI to train at home or in community during their activities of daily living under the supervision of a therapist. The aim of this pilot clinical trial was to assess the safety and feasibility of the TWIICE powered exoskeleton for assisted ambulation in a clinical setting.

Methods: This single-arm, open label feasibility study included 5 non-ambulatory individuals at least 6 months after onset of traumatic or non-traumatic SCI. Participants used the TWIICE exoskeleton during 6 sessions in the therapy premises of a Swiss SCI-specialized clinic undergoing a progressive mobility training. The incidence of adverse device effects (ADEs) was the primary outcome. In addition, standard walking tests such as 10 m Walk Test (10MWT), 6-minute Walk Test (6MWT), and Timed Up and Go (TUG) were performed using the device during the final session to evaluate usability after short-term training. Data are presented as median (range).

Results: We recruited 5 non-ambulatory individuals with SCI (2 females / 3 males, 32 (21-45) years of age). Four participants were motor complete (T6-T11) and 1 was motor incomplete (C7). Of the 10 adverse events occurring over the course of the 30 cumulative sessions, 4 were categorized as ADEs: reddening of the skin at contact points with the device (2x), transient intensification of neuropathic pain, and transient increase of spasticity. All ADEs subsided after a short time and without any sequelae. After 6 sessions, participants walked the 10MWT in 33 (24-144) seconds and were able to achieve 98 (37-137) meters during a 6MWT while using the device. Finally, the TUG was performed with the device and moderate assistance in 103 (61-135) seconds.

Conclusions: No serious safety concerns were identified during this feasibility study in a clinical setting. After 6 sessions, our relatively young and fit study population showed a variable but generally good performance in clinical measures when compared to reports on commercialized powered exoskeletons.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05926310.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
3.90%
发文量
122
审稿时长
24 months
期刊介绍: Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation considers manuscripts on all aspects of research that result from cross-fertilization of the fields of neuroscience, biomedical engineering, and physical medicine & rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信