开放楔形高位胫骨截骨术中不同牵张间隙对膝关节周围力学分布的影响:有限元分析及临床验证。

IF 1.6 4区 医学
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-26 DOI:10.1177/10225536251383123
Jing Han, Wenqian Xu, Jinsong Liu, Jianlin Zhao, Xiaoyu Wan, Zengrui Zhang, Zhiguang Chen, Tixiong Xia, Weibo Liao, Yingxing Xu
{"title":"开放楔形高位胫骨截骨术中不同牵张间隙对膝关节周围力学分布的影响:有限元分析及临床验证。","authors":"Jing Han, Wenqian Xu, Jinsong Liu, Jianlin Zhao, Xiaoyu Wan, Zengrui Zhang, Zhiguang Chen, Tixiong Xia, Weibo Liao, Yingxing Xu","doi":"10.1177/10225536251383123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveThe study aimed to investigate the mechanical distribution around knee joint after open wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) in different osteotomy distraction gaps (ODG) and confirm the safe ranges of correction after OWHTO.MethodsA three-dimensional finite element analysis (FEA) was performed to observe the max stress distribution for three compartments of knee joint in each OWHTO model under the different ODG (1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3 cm), and measure the joint line height (JLH), Blackburne Peel Index (BPI), Insall-Salvati index (ISI), and joint line convergence angle (JLCA). Moreover, a retrospective clinical study involving 50 patients underwent OWHTO (7 males with 8 knees and 40 females with 42 knees; aged from 42 to 67 years old, BMI ranged from 18.80 to 32.17 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, duration from 12 to 38 months) was implemented to further reveal the role of different ODG on the clinical outcomes of patients after OWHTO.ResultsIn the FEA, the ODG after OWHTO were positively correlated with the JLH (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.980), negatively correlated with the BPI (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.995) and the JLCA (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.989), and not correlated with the ISI. Additionally, the turning point for the stress alterations of the three compartments of the knee joint was found when the ODG ranged from 2 to 2.5 cm. In the clinical study, a significant correlation was investigated between the two classifications (Kellgren-Lawrence and Iwano grading) and correction angle (r = 0.447, <i>p</i> < .001; r = 0.592, <i>p</i> < .001). A lower grading was observed in the correction angle within the range of 9-12°, compared with that in other ranges (χ<sup>2</sup> = 31.733, <i>p</i> < .001; χ<sup>2</sup> = 34.899, <i>p</i> < .001).ConclusionsThe ODG could affect the stress distribution of three compartments of the knee joint by altering the JLH, JLCA and BPI. As result of this, limited correction angle should be fully considered in the preoperative planning to avoid overcorrection and patellofemoral joint disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":16608,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery","volume":"33 3","pages":"10225536251383123"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of different distraction gaps in open wedge high tibial osteotomy on the mechanical distribution around the knee joint: A finite element analysis and clinical validation.\",\"authors\":\"Jing Han, Wenqian Xu, Jinsong Liu, Jianlin Zhao, Xiaoyu Wan, Zengrui Zhang, Zhiguang Chen, Tixiong Xia, Weibo Liao, Yingxing Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10225536251383123\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>ObjectiveThe study aimed to investigate the mechanical distribution around knee joint after open wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) in different osteotomy distraction gaps (ODG) and confirm the safe ranges of correction after OWHTO.MethodsA three-dimensional finite element analysis (FEA) was performed to observe the max stress distribution for three compartments of knee joint in each OWHTO model under the different ODG (1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3 cm), and measure the joint line height (JLH), Blackburne Peel Index (BPI), Insall-Salvati index (ISI), and joint line convergence angle (JLCA). Moreover, a retrospective clinical study involving 50 patients underwent OWHTO (7 males with 8 knees and 40 females with 42 knees; aged from 42 to 67 years old, BMI ranged from 18.80 to 32.17 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, duration from 12 to 38 months) was implemented to further reveal the role of different ODG on the clinical outcomes of patients after OWHTO.ResultsIn the FEA, the ODG after OWHTO were positively correlated with the JLH (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.980), negatively correlated with the BPI (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.995) and the JLCA (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.989), and not correlated with the ISI. Additionally, the turning point for the stress alterations of the three compartments of the knee joint was found when the ODG ranged from 2 to 2.5 cm. In the clinical study, a significant correlation was investigated between the two classifications (Kellgren-Lawrence and Iwano grading) and correction angle (r = 0.447, <i>p</i> < .001; r = 0.592, <i>p</i> < .001). A lower grading was observed in the correction angle within the range of 9-12°, compared with that in other ranges (χ<sup>2</sup> = 31.733, <i>p</i> < .001; χ<sup>2</sup> = 34.899, <i>p</i> < .001).ConclusionsThe ODG could affect the stress distribution of three compartments of the knee joint by altering the JLH, JLCA and BPI. As result of this, limited correction angle should be fully considered in the preoperative planning to avoid overcorrection and patellofemoral joint disorders.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16608,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"33 3\",\"pages\":\"10225536251383123\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10225536251383123\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10225536251383123","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨不同截骨牵张间隙(ODG)下开楔形高位胫骨截骨术(OWHTO)术后膝关节周围的力学分布,确定OWHTO术后的安全矫正范围。方法采用三维有限元分析(FEA),观察不同ODG(1、1.5、2、2.5、3 cm)下各OWHTO模型膝关节3个隔室的最大应力分布,测量关节线高(JLH)、blackburn Peel指数(BPI)、Insall-Salvati指数(ISI)和关节线收敛角(JLCA)。此外,我们对50例接受OWHTO的患者(男性7例,8膝,女性40例,42膝,年龄42 ~ 67岁,BMI 18.80 ~ 32.17 kg/m2,持续时间12 ~ 38个月)进行回顾性临床研究,进一步揭示不同ODG对OWHTO患者临床结局的影响。结果在FEA中,OWHTO术后ODG与JLH (R2 = 0.980)呈正相关,与BPI (R2 = 0.995)和JLCA (R2 = 0.989)呈负相关,与ISI无相关。此外,当ODG在2至2.5 cm之间时,发现膝关节三个腔室应力变化的转折点。在临床研究中,两种分级(kelgren - lawrence和Iwano分级)与矫正角度存在显著相关性(r = 0.447, p < 0.001; r = 0.592, p < 0.001)。校正角在9 ~ 12°范围内的分级较其他范围低(χ2 = 31.733, p < 0.001; χ2 = 34.899, p < 0.001)。结论ODG可通过改变JLH、JLCA和BPI影响膝关节三腔室的应力分布。因此,在术前规划时应充分考虑有限的矫正角度,避免矫直过度和髌股关节紊乱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of different distraction gaps in open wedge high tibial osteotomy on the mechanical distribution around the knee joint: A finite element analysis and clinical validation.

ObjectiveThe study aimed to investigate the mechanical distribution around knee joint after open wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) in different osteotomy distraction gaps (ODG) and confirm the safe ranges of correction after OWHTO.MethodsA three-dimensional finite element analysis (FEA) was performed to observe the max stress distribution for three compartments of knee joint in each OWHTO model under the different ODG (1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3 cm), and measure the joint line height (JLH), Blackburne Peel Index (BPI), Insall-Salvati index (ISI), and joint line convergence angle (JLCA). Moreover, a retrospective clinical study involving 50 patients underwent OWHTO (7 males with 8 knees and 40 females with 42 knees; aged from 42 to 67 years old, BMI ranged from 18.80 to 32.17 kg/m2, duration from 12 to 38 months) was implemented to further reveal the role of different ODG on the clinical outcomes of patients after OWHTO.ResultsIn the FEA, the ODG after OWHTO were positively correlated with the JLH (R2 = 0.980), negatively correlated with the BPI (R2 = 0.995) and the JLCA (R2 = 0.989), and not correlated with the ISI. Additionally, the turning point for the stress alterations of the three compartments of the knee joint was found when the ODG ranged from 2 to 2.5 cm. In the clinical study, a significant correlation was investigated between the two classifications (Kellgren-Lawrence and Iwano grading) and correction angle (r = 0.447, p < .001; r = 0.592, p < .001). A lower grading was observed in the correction angle within the range of 9-12°, compared with that in other ranges (χ2 = 31.733, p < .001; χ2 = 34.899, p < .001).ConclusionsThe ODG could affect the stress distribution of three compartments of the knee joint by altering the JLH, JLCA and BPI. As result of this, limited correction angle should be fully considered in the preoperative planning to avoid overcorrection and patellofemoral joint disorders.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery is an open access peer-reviewed journal publishing original reviews and research articles on all aspects of orthopaedic surgery. It is the official journal of the Asia Pacific Orthopaedic Association. The journal welcomes and will publish materials of a diverse nature, from basic science research to clinical trials and surgical techniques. The journal encourages contributions from all parts of the world, but special emphasis is given to research of particular relevance to the Asia Pacific region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信