术前阿片类药物使用障碍预测ACDF术后通气时间延长、中央静脉导管放置和主要麻醉并发症:18万例大数据分析

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
David Maman, Maneesh Nandakumar, Yaniv Steinfeld, Yaron Berkovich
{"title":"术前阿片类药物使用障碍预测ACDF术后通气时间延长、中央静脉导管放置和主要麻醉并发症:18万例大数据分析","authors":"David Maman, Maneesh Nandakumar, Yaniv Steinfeld, Yaron Berkovich","doi":"10.3390/jcm14186661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Opioid use disorder (OUD) has emerged as a growing public health challenge, increasingly affecting surgical populations. While anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a common spinal procedure with known perioperative risks, the specific impact of preoperative OUD on anesthesia-related complications in ACDF remains poorly studied. <b>Methods:</b> We analyzed adult patients undergoing elective single-level ACDF between 2016 and 2022 using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. Patients with and without OUD were identified using ICD-10 codes. Propensity score matching was applied to adjust for baseline differences. Primary outcomes included prolonged ventilation, central line placement, and major anesthesiology complications. Secondary outcomes included total charges, length of stay, and number of procedures. A cost-effectiveness analysis of universal preoperative urine drug screening was also performed. <b>Results:</b> Among 178,215 patients undergoing ACDF, 1.5% had documented OUD. Following propensity matching, OUD patients had a significantly increased risk of prolonged ventilation (>24 h and >96 h), central line placement, blood transfusion, feeding tube insertion, and major anesthesiology complications. OUD patients experienced longer hospital stays (7.9 vs. 2.7 days), more procedures (4.2 vs. 3.0), and higher total charges ($139,207 vs. $82,179; all <i>p</i> < 0.01). The estimated excess cost attributable to OUD per surgical patient was $855, compared to a $75 screening cost. <b>Conclusions:</b> Preoperative OUD is associated with significantly increased perioperative risk, ICU-level intervention, and healthcare costs in ACDF patients. These findings support systematic preoperative screening and multidisciplinary management for patients with OUD undergoing spine surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":15533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":"14 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12470753/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preoperative Opioid Use Disorder Predicts Prolonged Ventilation, Central Line Placement, and Major Anesthesiology Complications After ACDF Surgery: A Big Data Analysis of 180,000 Cases.\",\"authors\":\"David Maman, Maneesh Nandakumar, Yaniv Steinfeld, Yaron Berkovich\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/jcm14186661\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Opioid use disorder (OUD) has emerged as a growing public health challenge, increasingly affecting surgical populations. While anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a common spinal procedure with known perioperative risks, the specific impact of preoperative OUD on anesthesia-related complications in ACDF remains poorly studied. <b>Methods:</b> We analyzed adult patients undergoing elective single-level ACDF between 2016 and 2022 using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. Patients with and without OUD were identified using ICD-10 codes. Propensity score matching was applied to adjust for baseline differences. Primary outcomes included prolonged ventilation, central line placement, and major anesthesiology complications. Secondary outcomes included total charges, length of stay, and number of procedures. A cost-effectiveness analysis of universal preoperative urine drug screening was also performed. <b>Results:</b> Among 178,215 patients undergoing ACDF, 1.5% had documented OUD. Following propensity matching, OUD patients had a significantly increased risk of prolonged ventilation (>24 h and >96 h), central line placement, blood transfusion, feeding tube insertion, and major anesthesiology complications. OUD patients experienced longer hospital stays (7.9 vs. 2.7 days), more procedures (4.2 vs. 3.0), and higher total charges ($139,207 vs. $82,179; all <i>p</i> < 0.01). The estimated excess cost attributable to OUD per surgical patient was $855, compared to a $75 screening cost. <b>Conclusions:</b> Preoperative OUD is associated with significantly increased perioperative risk, ICU-level intervention, and healthcare costs in ACDF patients. These findings support systematic preoperative screening and multidisciplinary management for patients with OUD undergoing spine surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Medicine\",\"volume\":\"14 18\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12470753/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14186661\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14186661","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)已成为日益严重的公共卫生挑战,越来越多地影响外科人群。虽然前路颈椎椎间盘切除术和融合术(ACDF)是一种常见的脊柱手术,已知围手术期风险,但术前OUD对ACDF中麻醉相关并发症的具体影响仍未得到充分研究。方法:我们使用全国住院患者样本(NIS)数据库分析2016年至2022年间接受选择性单级ACDF的成年患者。使用ICD-10代码对有无OUD患者进行识别。采用倾向评分匹配来调整基线差异。主要结局包括延长通气时间、放置中心静脉导管和主要麻醉并发症。次要结果包括总费用、住院时间和手术次数。普遍术前尿药物筛查的成本-效果分析也进行了。结果:在178,215例接受ACDF的患者中,1.5%记录有OUD。倾向匹配后,OUD患者出现延长通气时间(bbb24 h和bbb96 h)、置中央静脉管、输血、插入饲管和主要麻醉并发症的风险显著增加。OUD患者住院时间较长(7.9天对2.7天),手术次数较多(4.2天对3.0天),总费用较高(139,207美元对82,179美元,均p < 0.01)。每位手术患者因OUD造成的额外费用估计为855美元,而筛查费用为75美元。结论:术前OUD与ACDF患者围手术期风险、icu水平干预和医疗费用显著增加相关。这些发现支持对接受脊柱手术的OUD患者进行系统的术前筛查和多学科管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Preoperative Opioid Use Disorder Predicts Prolonged Ventilation, Central Line Placement, and Major Anesthesiology Complications After ACDF Surgery: A Big Data Analysis of 180,000 Cases.

Preoperative Opioid Use Disorder Predicts Prolonged Ventilation, Central Line Placement, and Major Anesthesiology Complications After ACDF Surgery: A Big Data Analysis of 180,000 Cases.

Preoperative Opioid Use Disorder Predicts Prolonged Ventilation, Central Line Placement, and Major Anesthesiology Complications After ACDF Surgery: A Big Data Analysis of 180,000 Cases.

Preoperative Opioid Use Disorder Predicts Prolonged Ventilation, Central Line Placement, and Major Anesthesiology Complications After ACDF Surgery: A Big Data Analysis of 180,000 Cases.

Background: Opioid use disorder (OUD) has emerged as a growing public health challenge, increasingly affecting surgical populations. While anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a common spinal procedure with known perioperative risks, the specific impact of preoperative OUD on anesthesia-related complications in ACDF remains poorly studied. Methods: We analyzed adult patients undergoing elective single-level ACDF between 2016 and 2022 using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. Patients with and without OUD were identified using ICD-10 codes. Propensity score matching was applied to adjust for baseline differences. Primary outcomes included prolonged ventilation, central line placement, and major anesthesiology complications. Secondary outcomes included total charges, length of stay, and number of procedures. A cost-effectiveness analysis of universal preoperative urine drug screening was also performed. Results: Among 178,215 patients undergoing ACDF, 1.5% had documented OUD. Following propensity matching, OUD patients had a significantly increased risk of prolonged ventilation (>24 h and >96 h), central line placement, blood transfusion, feeding tube insertion, and major anesthesiology complications. OUD patients experienced longer hospital stays (7.9 vs. 2.7 days), more procedures (4.2 vs. 3.0), and higher total charges ($139,207 vs. $82,179; all p < 0.01). The estimated excess cost attributable to OUD per surgical patient was $855, compared to a $75 screening cost. Conclusions: Preoperative OUD is associated with significantly increased perioperative risk, ICU-level intervention, and healthcare costs in ACDF patients. These findings support systematic preoperative screening and multidisciplinary management for patients with OUD undergoing spine surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Journal of Clinical Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6468
审稿时长
16.32 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383), is an international scientific open access journal, providing a platform for advances in health care/clinical practices, the study of direct observation of patients and general medical research. This multi-disciplinary journal is aimed at a wide audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals. Unique features of this journal: manuscripts regarding original research and ideas will be particularly welcomed.JCM also accepts reviews, communications, and short notes. There is no limit to publication length: our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信