2019冠状病毒病的全球教训:大流行期间和大流行后医院获得性感染管理的区域差异

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Corina Voinea, Elena Mocanu, Cristian Opariuc-Dan, Elena Dantes, Alexandra-Cristina Gache, Sorin Rugina
{"title":"2019冠状病毒病的全球教训:大流行期间和大流行后医院获得性感染管理的区域差异","authors":"Corina Voinea, Elena Mocanu, Cristian Opariuc-Dan, Elena Dantes, Alexandra-Cristina Gache, Sorin Rugina","doi":"10.3390/jcm14186654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly disrupted healthcare systems worldwide, exposing longstanding weaknesses, particularly in the prevention and control of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). Regional disparities in infection prevention and control (IPC) strategies offered valuable lessons for improving public health preparedness. This systematic review aims to identify and compare regional IPC approaches adopted during and after the pandemic, highlighting best practices to strengthen healthcare resilience. <b>Methods</b>: The review was conducted in line with PRISMA guidelines and registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD420251032525). Articles published between 1 January 2020 and 31 March 2025, were retrieved from PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Only full-text studies in English were included. The risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. <b>Results</b>: Of the 63 articles initially identified, 8 met the inclusion criteria. The selected studies demonstrated substantial variability in the implementation of IPC. The availability of infrastructure, funding, coordination capacity, and training of medical staff had a significant impact on outcomes. In regions with well-defined protocols and a solid infrastructure, there was a significant decrease in HAIs, while in resource-poor areas, there was a significant increase. Effective measures included continuous monitoring, regular staff training, provision of adequate equipment, expansion of testing capacity, reorganisation of hospitals, and introduction of technological innovations in healthcare. <b>Conclusions</b>: COVID-19 emphasised the importance of adaptable IPC frameworks. Strengthening health systems requires context-specific standards, sustained investment in infrastructure, continuous training, and increased international cooperation to better prepare for future health emergencies.</p>","PeriodicalId":15533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":"14 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12470883/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Global Lessons from COVID-19: Regional Variations in the Management of Hospital-Acquired Infections During and Post-Pandemic.\",\"authors\":\"Corina Voinea, Elena Mocanu, Cristian Opariuc-Dan, Elena Dantes, Alexandra-Cristina Gache, Sorin Rugina\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/jcm14186654\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly disrupted healthcare systems worldwide, exposing longstanding weaknesses, particularly in the prevention and control of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). Regional disparities in infection prevention and control (IPC) strategies offered valuable lessons for improving public health preparedness. This systematic review aims to identify and compare regional IPC approaches adopted during and after the pandemic, highlighting best practices to strengthen healthcare resilience. <b>Methods</b>: The review was conducted in line with PRISMA guidelines and registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD420251032525). Articles published between 1 January 2020 and 31 March 2025, were retrieved from PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Only full-text studies in English were included. The risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. <b>Results</b>: Of the 63 articles initially identified, 8 met the inclusion criteria. The selected studies demonstrated substantial variability in the implementation of IPC. The availability of infrastructure, funding, coordination capacity, and training of medical staff had a significant impact on outcomes. In regions with well-defined protocols and a solid infrastructure, there was a significant decrease in HAIs, while in resource-poor areas, there was a significant increase. Effective measures included continuous monitoring, regular staff training, provision of adequate equipment, expansion of testing capacity, reorganisation of hospitals, and introduction of technological innovations in healthcare. <b>Conclusions</b>: COVID-19 emphasised the importance of adaptable IPC frameworks. Strengthening health systems requires context-specific standards, sustained investment in infrastructure, continuous training, and increased international cooperation to better prepare for future health emergencies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Medicine\",\"volume\":\"14 18\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12470883/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14186654\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14186654","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:2019冠状病毒病大流行严重扰乱了全球卫生保健系统,暴露出长期存在的弱点,特别是在预防和控制卫生保健相关感染方面。感染预防和控制战略的区域差异为改进公共卫生准备工作提供了宝贵的经验。本系统审查旨在确定和比较大流行期间和之后采用的区域IPC方法,强调加强卫生保健复原力的最佳做法。方法:该综述按照PRISMA指南进行,并在PROSPERO数据库注册(CRD420251032525)。2020年1月1日至2025年3月31日期间发表的文章,检索自PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science。只包括英文全文研究。使用ROBINS-I工具评估偏倚风险。结果:初步纳入的63篇文献中,有8篇符合纳入标准。选定的研究表明,IPC的实施存在很大差异。基础设施、资金、协调能力和医务人员培训的可用性对结果产生重大影响。在有明确的协议和坚实的基础设施的区域,卫生保健指数显著减少,而在资源贫乏地区,卫生保健指数显著增加。有效措施包括持续监测、定期对工作人员进行培训、提供足够的设备、扩大检测能力、重组医院以及在医疗保健领域引入技术创新。结论:COVID-19强调了适应性IPC框架的重要性。加强卫生系统需要有具体情况的标准、对基础设施的持续投资、持续培训和加强国际合作,以便更好地为未来的突发卫生事件做好准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Global Lessons from COVID-19: Regional Variations in the Management of Hospital-Acquired Infections During and Post-Pandemic.

Global Lessons from COVID-19: Regional Variations in the Management of Hospital-Acquired Infections During and Post-Pandemic.

Global Lessons from COVID-19: Regional Variations in the Management of Hospital-Acquired Infections During and Post-Pandemic.

Global Lessons from COVID-19: Regional Variations in the Management of Hospital-Acquired Infections During and Post-Pandemic.

Background/Objectives: The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly disrupted healthcare systems worldwide, exposing longstanding weaknesses, particularly in the prevention and control of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). Regional disparities in infection prevention and control (IPC) strategies offered valuable lessons for improving public health preparedness. This systematic review aims to identify and compare regional IPC approaches adopted during and after the pandemic, highlighting best practices to strengthen healthcare resilience. Methods: The review was conducted in line with PRISMA guidelines and registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD420251032525). Articles published between 1 January 2020 and 31 March 2025, were retrieved from PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Only full-text studies in English were included. The risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. Results: Of the 63 articles initially identified, 8 met the inclusion criteria. The selected studies demonstrated substantial variability in the implementation of IPC. The availability of infrastructure, funding, coordination capacity, and training of medical staff had a significant impact on outcomes. In regions with well-defined protocols and a solid infrastructure, there was a significant decrease in HAIs, while in resource-poor areas, there was a significant increase. Effective measures included continuous monitoring, regular staff training, provision of adequate equipment, expansion of testing capacity, reorganisation of hospitals, and introduction of technological innovations in healthcare. Conclusions: COVID-19 emphasised the importance of adaptable IPC frameworks. Strengthening health systems requires context-specific standards, sustained investment in infrastructure, continuous training, and increased international cooperation to better prepare for future health emergencies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Journal of Clinical Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6468
审稿时长
16.32 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383), is an international scientific open access journal, providing a platform for advances in health care/clinical practices, the study of direct observation of patients and general medical research. This multi-disciplinary journal is aimed at a wide audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals. Unique features of this journal: manuscripts regarding original research and ideas will be particularly welcomed.JCM also accepts reviews, communications, and short notes. There is no limit to publication length: our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信