颈动脉多普勒成像作为液体反应性的标志。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Ankur Srivastava, Christopher Tam, Samir Sethi, Mario Gaudino, Brady Rippon, Joydeep Baidya, Sanya Rastogi, Alexandra Lopes, Avika Kasubhai, Kane Pryor, James Osorio
{"title":"颈动脉多普勒成像作为液体反应性的标志。","authors":"Ankur Srivastava, Christopher Tam, Samir Sethi, Mario Gaudino, Brady Rippon, Joydeep Baidya, Sanya Rastogi, Alexandra Lopes, Avika Kasubhai, Kane Pryor, James Osorio","doi":"10.3390/jcm14186657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objective:</b> Identifying fluid-responsive patients is essential in managing hemodynamic instability. Traditional static measures like central venous pressure (CVP) are often unreliable. Prior studies suggest that cardiac ultrasound (US), particularly carotid Doppler point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS), may correlate with pulmonary artery catheter (PAC)-derived cardiac output (CO), offering a noninvasive tool to assess fluid responsiveness. We aimed to evaluate the correlation between carotid ultrasound (US) parameters and pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) derived measurements in post cardiac surgery patients. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted a prospective cohort study on 50 postcardiac surgery patients from 2019 to 2022 in a single cardiothoracic ICU. Carotid US and PAC CO measurements were obtained at four intervals: pre- and post-passive leg raise (fluid challenge) on ICU admission, and one hour later. Fluid responsiveness was defined as a ≥10% increase in carotid blood flow, ≥7 ms increase in corrected flow time (FTc), or ≥10% change in respiratory peak carotid systolic velocity (ΔCDPV). Pearson's correlation and linear regression were used to assess associations between carotid US and PAC changes. Agreement in fluid responsiveness categorization (≥10% CO change) was evaluated using weighted Cohen's kappa. Significance was set at α = 0.05. <b>Results:</b> No significant correlation was found between changes in carotid US parameters and the PAC cardiac index (CI) at baseline or one hour for ΔCDPV, FTc, or carotid blood flow. A moderate correlation was observed between carotid blood flow and FTc at one hour (r = 0.41, <i>p</i> = 0.005). Regression and sensitivity analyses showed no significant associations. <b>Conclusions:</b> The carotid US parameters did not correlate with PAC-derived CO after passive leg raise. Further studies are needed to validate carotid POCUS in this setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":15533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":"14 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12471214/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Carotid Doppler Imaging as a Marker for Fluid Responsiveness.\",\"authors\":\"Ankur Srivastava, Christopher Tam, Samir Sethi, Mario Gaudino, Brady Rippon, Joydeep Baidya, Sanya Rastogi, Alexandra Lopes, Avika Kasubhai, Kane Pryor, James Osorio\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/jcm14186657\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background/Objective:</b> Identifying fluid-responsive patients is essential in managing hemodynamic instability. Traditional static measures like central venous pressure (CVP) are often unreliable. Prior studies suggest that cardiac ultrasound (US), particularly carotid Doppler point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS), may correlate with pulmonary artery catheter (PAC)-derived cardiac output (CO), offering a noninvasive tool to assess fluid responsiveness. We aimed to evaluate the correlation between carotid ultrasound (US) parameters and pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) derived measurements in post cardiac surgery patients. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted a prospective cohort study on 50 postcardiac surgery patients from 2019 to 2022 in a single cardiothoracic ICU. Carotid US and PAC CO measurements were obtained at four intervals: pre- and post-passive leg raise (fluid challenge) on ICU admission, and one hour later. Fluid responsiveness was defined as a ≥10% increase in carotid blood flow, ≥7 ms increase in corrected flow time (FTc), or ≥10% change in respiratory peak carotid systolic velocity (ΔCDPV). Pearson's correlation and linear regression were used to assess associations between carotid US and PAC changes. Agreement in fluid responsiveness categorization (≥10% CO change) was evaluated using weighted Cohen's kappa. Significance was set at α = 0.05. <b>Results:</b> No significant correlation was found between changes in carotid US parameters and the PAC cardiac index (CI) at baseline or one hour for ΔCDPV, FTc, or carotid blood flow. A moderate correlation was observed between carotid blood flow and FTc at one hour (r = 0.41, <i>p</i> = 0.005). Regression and sensitivity analyses showed no significant associations. <b>Conclusions:</b> The carotid US parameters did not correlate with PAC-derived CO after passive leg raise. Further studies are needed to validate carotid POCUS in this setting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Medicine\",\"volume\":\"14 18\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12471214/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14186657\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14186657","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:识别液体反应性患者对于治疗血流动力学不稳定至关重要。传统的静态测量方法如中心静脉压(CVP)往往不可靠。先前的研究表明,心脏超声(US),特别是颈动脉多普勒超声(POCUS),可能与肺动脉导管(PAC)衍生的心输出量(CO)相关,为评估液体反应性提供了一种无创工具。我们旨在评估心脏手术后患者颈动脉超声(US)参数与肺动脉导管(PAC)衍生测量的相关性。方法:我们对2019年至2022年在单一心胸ICU的50例心脏手术后患者进行了前瞻性队列研究。颈动脉US和PAC CO测量在四个间隔进行:ICU入院时被动抬高腿(液体刺激)前后和1小时后。液体反应性定义为颈动脉血流量增加≥10%,校正血流时间(FTc)增加≥7 ms,或颈动脉呼吸峰值收缩速度变化≥10% (ΔCDPV)。使用Pearson相关和线性回归来评估颈动脉US和PAC变化之间的关系。采用加权Cohen’s kappa评价流体反应性分类(CO变化≥10%)的一致性。显著性设为α = 0.05。结果:颈动脉US参数的变化与基线或1小时时的PAC心脏指数(CI) ΔCDPV、FTc或颈动脉血流量之间无显著相关性。颈动脉血流量与1小时FTc有中度相关性(r = 0.41, p = 0.005)。回归分析和敏感性分析显示无显著相关性。结论:被动抬腿后颈动脉US参数与pac源性CO无关。在这种情况下,需要进一步的研究来验证颈动脉POCUS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Carotid Doppler Imaging as a Marker for Fluid Responsiveness.

Carotid Doppler Imaging as a Marker for Fluid Responsiveness.

Carotid Doppler Imaging as a Marker for Fluid Responsiveness.

Carotid Doppler Imaging as a Marker for Fluid Responsiveness.

Background/Objective: Identifying fluid-responsive patients is essential in managing hemodynamic instability. Traditional static measures like central venous pressure (CVP) are often unreliable. Prior studies suggest that cardiac ultrasound (US), particularly carotid Doppler point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS), may correlate with pulmonary artery catheter (PAC)-derived cardiac output (CO), offering a noninvasive tool to assess fluid responsiveness. We aimed to evaluate the correlation between carotid ultrasound (US) parameters and pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) derived measurements in post cardiac surgery patients. Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study on 50 postcardiac surgery patients from 2019 to 2022 in a single cardiothoracic ICU. Carotid US and PAC CO measurements were obtained at four intervals: pre- and post-passive leg raise (fluid challenge) on ICU admission, and one hour later. Fluid responsiveness was defined as a ≥10% increase in carotid blood flow, ≥7 ms increase in corrected flow time (FTc), or ≥10% change in respiratory peak carotid systolic velocity (ΔCDPV). Pearson's correlation and linear regression were used to assess associations between carotid US and PAC changes. Agreement in fluid responsiveness categorization (≥10% CO change) was evaluated using weighted Cohen's kappa. Significance was set at α = 0.05. Results: No significant correlation was found between changes in carotid US parameters and the PAC cardiac index (CI) at baseline or one hour for ΔCDPV, FTc, or carotid blood flow. A moderate correlation was observed between carotid blood flow and FTc at one hour (r = 0.41, p = 0.005). Regression and sensitivity analyses showed no significant associations. Conclusions: The carotid US parameters did not correlate with PAC-derived CO after passive leg raise. Further studies are needed to validate carotid POCUS in this setting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Journal of Clinical Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6468
审稿时长
16.32 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383), is an international scientific open access journal, providing a platform for advances in health care/clinical practices, the study of direct observation of patients and general medical research. This multi-disciplinary journal is aimed at a wide audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals. Unique features of this journal: manuscripts regarding original research and ideas will be particularly welcomed.JCM also accepts reviews, communications, and short notes. There is no limit to publication length: our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信