导航高速钻头辅助颈椎和上胸椎椎弓根螺钉置入的准确性- 1112根椎弓根螺钉的单中心经验。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Stefan Aspalter, Nico Stroh-Holly, Katja Höllmüller, Armin Davachi, Philip Rauch, Stephan Heisinger, Andreas Gruber, Wolfgang Senker
{"title":"导航高速钻头辅助颈椎和上胸椎椎弓根螺钉置入的准确性- 1112根椎弓根螺钉的单中心经验。","authors":"Stefan Aspalter, Nico Stroh-Holly, Katja Höllmüller, Armin Davachi, Philip Rauch, Stephan Heisinger, Andreas Gruber, Wolfgang Senker","doi":"10.3390/jcm14186597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: While biomechanically superior, cervical pedicle screw placement is technically challenging, and therefore typically performed only in centers with the aid of navigation. The purpose of this study was to analyze the accuracy and safety of navigated cervical pedicle screw (CPS) placement using intraoperative imaging with a workflow using a navigated high-speed drill in a large single-center cohort. <b>Methods</b>: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 205 patients undergoing posterior cervical or cervicothoracic instrumentation between January 2018 and June 2024. Accuracy was assessed using the Gertzbein-Robbins classification, with grades 0 and 1 considered satisfactory. Surgical workflow, intraoperative imaging, and complications were analyzed. <b>Results</b>: A total of 1112 pedicle screws, including 888 cervical and 224 upper thoracic screws, were evaluated. 801 were grade 0 (72.0%), 250 grade 1 (22.5%), 56 grade 2 (5.0%), and 5 grade 3 (0.4%). Cervical screws achieved satisfactory placement grades 0 and 1 in 93.1%, and upper thoracic screws in 100% (92.0% grade 0, 8.0% grade 1). Grade 3 breaches occurred in C2, C3, C5, C6, and C7, with one case each. There were no cases of implant-related neurovascular injuries. <b>Conclusions</b>: This study demonstrates high screw accuracy with a low observed complication rate. No revision surgeries were required due to screw malposition, but 7 cases of screw loosening occurred. However, the retrospective design and reliance on intraoperative imaging limit the generalizability of the findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":15533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":"14 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12471098/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy of Navigated High-Speed Drill-Assisted Cervical and Upper Thoracic Pedicle Screw Placement-A Single Center Experience with 1112 Pedicle Screws.\",\"authors\":\"Stefan Aspalter, Nico Stroh-Holly, Katja Höllmüller, Armin Davachi, Philip Rauch, Stephan Heisinger, Andreas Gruber, Wolfgang Senker\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/jcm14186597\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: While biomechanically superior, cervical pedicle screw placement is technically challenging, and therefore typically performed only in centers with the aid of navigation. The purpose of this study was to analyze the accuracy and safety of navigated cervical pedicle screw (CPS) placement using intraoperative imaging with a workflow using a navigated high-speed drill in a large single-center cohort. <b>Methods</b>: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 205 patients undergoing posterior cervical or cervicothoracic instrumentation between January 2018 and June 2024. Accuracy was assessed using the Gertzbein-Robbins classification, with grades 0 and 1 considered satisfactory. Surgical workflow, intraoperative imaging, and complications were analyzed. <b>Results</b>: A total of 1112 pedicle screws, including 888 cervical and 224 upper thoracic screws, were evaluated. 801 were grade 0 (72.0%), 250 grade 1 (22.5%), 56 grade 2 (5.0%), and 5 grade 3 (0.4%). Cervical screws achieved satisfactory placement grades 0 and 1 in 93.1%, and upper thoracic screws in 100% (92.0% grade 0, 8.0% grade 1). Grade 3 breaches occurred in C2, C3, C5, C6, and C7, with one case each. There were no cases of implant-related neurovascular injuries. <b>Conclusions</b>: This study demonstrates high screw accuracy with a low observed complication rate. No revision surgeries were required due to screw malposition, but 7 cases of screw loosening occurred. However, the retrospective design and reliance on intraoperative imaging limit the generalizability of the findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Medicine\",\"volume\":\"14 18\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12471098/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14186597\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14186597","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:虽然具有生物力学优势,但颈椎椎弓根螺钉置入在技术上具有挑战性,因此通常只能在导航的帮助下在中心进行。本研究的目的是在一项大型单中心队列研究中,利用术中成像和使用导航高速钻头的工作流程分析导航颈椎椎弓根螺钉(CPS)置入的准确性和安全性。方法:我们对2018年1月至2024年6月期间接受后路颈椎或颈胸内固定术的205例患者进行了回顾性分析。使用Gertzbein-Robbins分类评估准确性,0级和1级被认为是满意的。分析手术流程、术中影像及并发症。结果:共评估椎弓根螺钉1112枚,其中颈椎螺钉888枚,上胸椎螺钉224枚。0级801例(72.0%),1级250例(22.5%),2级56例(5.0%),3级5例(0.4%)。93.1%的颈椎螺钉置入0级和1级满意,100%的上胸椎螺钉置入满意(0级92.0%,1级8.0%)。3级骨折发生在C2、C3、C5、C6和C7,各1例。无植入物相关神经血管损伤病例。结论:本研究显示螺钉精确度高,并发症发生率低。螺钉错位无翻修手术,但发生螺钉松动7例。然而,回顾性设计和对术中影像的依赖限制了结果的普遍性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Accuracy of Navigated High-Speed Drill-Assisted Cervical and Upper Thoracic Pedicle Screw Placement-A Single Center Experience with 1112 Pedicle Screws.

Accuracy of Navigated High-Speed Drill-Assisted Cervical and Upper Thoracic Pedicle Screw Placement-A Single Center Experience with 1112 Pedicle Screws.

Accuracy of Navigated High-Speed Drill-Assisted Cervical and Upper Thoracic Pedicle Screw Placement-A Single Center Experience with 1112 Pedicle Screws.

Accuracy of Navigated High-Speed Drill-Assisted Cervical and Upper Thoracic Pedicle Screw Placement-A Single Center Experience with 1112 Pedicle Screws.

Background/Objectives: While biomechanically superior, cervical pedicle screw placement is technically challenging, and therefore typically performed only in centers with the aid of navigation. The purpose of this study was to analyze the accuracy and safety of navigated cervical pedicle screw (CPS) placement using intraoperative imaging with a workflow using a navigated high-speed drill in a large single-center cohort. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 205 patients undergoing posterior cervical or cervicothoracic instrumentation between January 2018 and June 2024. Accuracy was assessed using the Gertzbein-Robbins classification, with grades 0 and 1 considered satisfactory. Surgical workflow, intraoperative imaging, and complications were analyzed. Results: A total of 1112 pedicle screws, including 888 cervical and 224 upper thoracic screws, were evaluated. 801 were grade 0 (72.0%), 250 grade 1 (22.5%), 56 grade 2 (5.0%), and 5 grade 3 (0.4%). Cervical screws achieved satisfactory placement grades 0 and 1 in 93.1%, and upper thoracic screws in 100% (92.0% grade 0, 8.0% grade 1). Grade 3 breaches occurred in C2, C3, C5, C6, and C7, with one case each. There were no cases of implant-related neurovascular injuries. Conclusions: This study demonstrates high screw accuracy with a low observed complication rate. No revision surgeries were required due to screw malposition, but 7 cases of screw loosening occurred. However, the retrospective design and reliance on intraoperative imaging limit the generalizability of the findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Journal of Clinical Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6468
审稿时长
16.32 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383), is an international scientific open access journal, providing a platform for advances in health care/clinical practices, the study of direct observation of patients and general medical research. This multi-disciplinary journal is aimed at a wide audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals. Unique features of this journal: manuscripts regarding original research and ideas will be particularly welcomed.JCM also accepts reviews, communications, and short notes. There is no limit to publication length: our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信