制定建议以改善加拿大公共安全人员的危机热线支持:一项多方法国家研究方案。

IF 1.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Gisell Castillo, Chantalle Clarkin, Thiyake Rajaratnam, Fatima Ahmad, Susan Anderson, Gil Angela Dela Cruz, Nadia Aleem, R Nicholas Carleton, Matthew Charbonneau, Adam Crewdson, Danielle Dubé, Max Gomez, Jenny Hardy, Chris Hargreaves, Simon Hatcher, Fardous Hosseiny, Brian Mishara, Eva Serhal, Daisy R Singla, Mark Sinyor, Caitlin Tavares, Karen VanderSluis, Yolanda Wolfgram, Juveria Zaheer, Allison Crawford
{"title":"制定建议以改善加拿大公共安全人员的危机热线支持:一项多方法国家研究方案。","authors":"Gisell Castillo, Chantalle Clarkin, Thiyake Rajaratnam, Fatima Ahmad, Susan Anderson, Gil Angela Dela Cruz, Nadia Aleem, R Nicholas Carleton, Matthew Charbonneau, Adam Crewdson, Danielle Dubé, Max Gomez, Jenny Hardy, Chris Hargreaves, Simon Hatcher, Fardous Hosseiny, Brian Mishara, Eva Serhal, Daisy R Singla, Mark Sinyor, Caitlin Tavares, Karen VanderSluis, Yolanda Wolfgram, Juveria Zaheer, Allison Crawford","doi":"10.2196/75285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Public Safety Personnel (PSP) in Canada experience disproportionately high rates of mental distress and suicidal thoughts and behaviors. PSP mental health is a critical public health issue with far-reaching implications for both individual well-being and the effectiveness of emergency response systems. Crisis lines are an evidence-based public health intervention; however, knowledge gaps remain regarding PSP crisis line use, barriers to accessing services, and the appropriateness of crisis line service models for meeting PSP mental health needs.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to address these knowledge gaps using a participatory approach to better understand the crisis line needs and preferences of PSP communities. We also aim to apply our learnings and co-design actionable recommendations for crisis line service improvements and to support PSP who may wish to contact a crisis line.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This Canada-wide study uses multiple methods across three iterative phases. Phase 1 involves community engagement with PSP to better understand their crisis needs and existing supports. Instrumental to our engagement ethic is the formation of a co-researcher group, composed of PSP with lived experience, who will guide the research process. We will review deidentified crisis line interactions to identify patterns in service use and call outcomes to identify possible points of intervention to enhance service efficacy. We will launch a national web-based anonymous survey to understand the crisis line needs, barriers, and preferences of PSP. Phase 2 focuses on deepening our understanding of PSP experiences with crisis lines through in-depth interviews with those who have accessed or thought about accessing crisis lines and those without crisis line experience who wish to share their views. We will conduct focus groups with crisis sector staff to learn about desired training and resources for improving service delivery to PSP. Phase 3 focuses on developing and conducting co-design workshops to generate evidence-based recommendations with PSP, crisis line responders, researchers, and clinicians. Collaborating across sectors will allow us to codevelop feasible strategies for improving crisis line services to better meet the needs of PSP in crisis who may be inclined to access crisis lines for support.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>As of December 2024, the crisis line dataset has been identified and study recruitment for the national survey was completed. Data collection for all other research activities is expected to conclude by May 2025. We anticipate that study findings will be available by the end of 2025.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>By identifying barriers to crisis line use and codeveloping solutions, this research will inform policy, service design, and training to enhance services. Ensuring PSP can access crisis line supports that are equitable, evidence-based, and integrated within mental health care systems is crucial to fostering a resilient public safety workforce and emergency response capacities at a societal level.</p><p><strong>International registered report identifier (irrid): </strong>DERR1-10.2196/75285.</p>","PeriodicalId":14755,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Research Protocols","volume":"14 ","pages":"e75285"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12514416/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing Recommendations to Improve Crisis Line Supports for Public Safety Personnel in Canada: Protocol for a Multimethod National Study.\",\"authors\":\"Gisell Castillo, Chantalle Clarkin, Thiyake Rajaratnam, Fatima Ahmad, Susan Anderson, Gil Angela Dela Cruz, Nadia Aleem, R Nicholas Carleton, Matthew Charbonneau, Adam Crewdson, Danielle Dubé, Max Gomez, Jenny Hardy, Chris Hargreaves, Simon Hatcher, Fardous Hosseiny, Brian Mishara, Eva Serhal, Daisy R Singla, Mark Sinyor, Caitlin Tavares, Karen VanderSluis, Yolanda Wolfgram, Juveria Zaheer, Allison Crawford\",\"doi\":\"10.2196/75285\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Public Safety Personnel (PSP) in Canada experience disproportionately high rates of mental distress and suicidal thoughts and behaviors. PSP mental health is a critical public health issue with far-reaching implications for both individual well-being and the effectiveness of emergency response systems. Crisis lines are an evidence-based public health intervention; however, knowledge gaps remain regarding PSP crisis line use, barriers to accessing services, and the appropriateness of crisis line service models for meeting PSP mental health needs.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to address these knowledge gaps using a participatory approach to better understand the crisis line needs and preferences of PSP communities. We also aim to apply our learnings and co-design actionable recommendations for crisis line service improvements and to support PSP who may wish to contact a crisis line.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This Canada-wide study uses multiple methods across three iterative phases. Phase 1 involves community engagement with PSP to better understand their crisis needs and existing supports. Instrumental to our engagement ethic is the formation of a co-researcher group, composed of PSP with lived experience, who will guide the research process. We will review deidentified crisis line interactions to identify patterns in service use and call outcomes to identify possible points of intervention to enhance service efficacy. We will launch a national web-based anonymous survey to understand the crisis line needs, barriers, and preferences of PSP. Phase 2 focuses on deepening our understanding of PSP experiences with crisis lines through in-depth interviews with those who have accessed or thought about accessing crisis lines and those without crisis line experience who wish to share their views. We will conduct focus groups with crisis sector staff to learn about desired training and resources for improving service delivery to PSP. Phase 3 focuses on developing and conducting co-design workshops to generate evidence-based recommendations with PSP, crisis line responders, researchers, and clinicians. Collaborating across sectors will allow us to codevelop feasible strategies for improving crisis line services to better meet the needs of PSP in crisis who may be inclined to access crisis lines for support.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>As of December 2024, the crisis line dataset has been identified and study recruitment for the national survey was completed. Data collection for all other research activities is expected to conclude by May 2025. We anticipate that study findings will be available by the end of 2025.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>By identifying barriers to crisis line use and codeveloping solutions, this research will inform policy, service design, and training to enhance services. Ensuring PSP can access crisis line supports that are equitable, evidence-based, and integrated within mental health care systems is crucial to fostering a resilient public safety workforce and emergency response capacities at a societal level.</p><p><strong>International registered report identifier (irrid): </strong>DERR1-10.2196/75285.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14755,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JMIR Research Protocols\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"e75285\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12514416/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JMIR Research Protocols\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2196/75285\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Research Protocols","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/75285","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:加拿大的公共安全人员(PSP)经历了不成比例的高比率的精神痛苦和自杀念头和行为。PSP心理健康是一个重要的公共卫生问题,对个人福祉和应急响应系统的有效性都具有深远的影响。危机热线是一种基于证据的公共卫生干预措施;然而,在PSP危机热线的使用、获得服务的障碍以及满足PSP心理健康需求的危机热线服务模式的适当性方面,知识差距仍然存在。目的:本研究旨在通过参与式方法解决这些知识缺口,以更好地了解PSP社区的危机线需求和偏好。我们还致力于应用我们的经验教训,共同设计可操作的建议,以改善危机热线服务,并支持可能希望联系危机热线的PSP。方法:这项加拿大范围的研究在三个迭代阶段使用多种方法。第一阶段涉及社区参与PSP,以更好地了解他们的危机需求和现有支持。我们参与伦理的工具是形成一个共同研究小组,由有生活经验的PSP组成,他们将指导研究过程。我们将审查未确定的危机线交互,以确定服务使用模式和呼叫结果,以确定可能的干预点,以提高服务效率。我们将发起一项全国性的基于网络的匿名调查,以了解PSP的危机线需求、障碍和偏好。第二阶段的重点是加深我们对PSP危机线经验的理解,通过深入采访那些已经访问或考虑访问危机线的人,以及那些没有危机线经验的人,他们希望分享他们的观点。我们会与危机处理部门的工作人员进行焦点小组讨论,以了解改善为危机处理部门提供服务所需的培训和资源。第三阶段的重点是开发和开展共同设计研讨会,与PSP、危机一线响应者、研究人员和临床医生一起提出基于证据的建议。跨部门合作将使我们能够共同制定可行的战略,改善危机热线服务,以更好地满足危机中可能倾向于使用危机热线寻求支持的PSP的需求。结果:截至2024年12月,已确定危机线数据集,并完成了全国调查的研究招募。所有其他研究活动的数据收集预计将于2025年5月完成。我们预计研究结果将于2025年底公布。结论:通过识别使用危机热线的障碍并共同开发解决方案,本研究将为政策、服务设计和培训提供信息,以增强服务。确保精神卫生专业人员能够获得公平的、基于证据的、整合在精神卫生保健系统内的危机热线支持,对于在社会层面培养一支有弹性的公共安全工作队伍和应急响应能力至关重要。国际注册报告标识符(irrid): DERR1-10.2196/75285。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Developing Recommendations to Improve Crisis Line Supports for Public Safety Personnel in Canada: Protocol for a Multimethod National Study.

Background: Public Safety Personnel (PSP) in Canada experience disproportionately high rates of mental distress and suicidal thoughts and behaviors. PSP mental health is a critical public health issue with far-reaching implications for both individual well-being and the effectiveness of emergency response systems. Crisis lines are an evidence-based public health intervention; however, knowledge gaps remain regarding PSP crisis line use, barriers to accessing services, and the appropriateness of crisis line service models for meeting PSP mental health needs.

Objective: This study aims to address these knowledge gaps using a participatory approach to better understand the crisis line needs and preferences of PSP communities. We also aim to apply our learnings and co-design actionable recommendations for crisis line service improvements and to support PSP who may wish to contact a crisis line.

Methods: This Canada-wide study uses multiple methods across three iterative phases. Phase 1 involves community engagement with PSP to better understand their crisis needs and existing supports. Instrumental to our engagement ethic is the formation of a co-researcher group, composed of PSP with lived experience, who will guide the research process. We will review deidentified crisis line interactions to identify patterns in service use and call outcomes to identify possible points of intervention to enhance service efficacy. We will launch a national web-based anonymous survey to understand the crisis line needs, barriers, and preferences of PSP. Phase 2 focuses on deepening our understanding of PSP experiences with crisis lines through in-depth interviews with those who have accessed or thought about accessing crisis lines and those without crisis line experience who wish to share their views. We will conduct focus groups with crisis sector staff to learn about desired training and resources for improving service delivery to PSP. Phase 3 focuses on developing and conducting co-design workshops to generate evidence-based recommendations with PSP, crisis line responders, researchers, and clinicians. Collaborating across sectors will allow us to codevelop feasible strategies for improving crisis line services to better meet the needs of PSP in crisis who may be inclined to access crisis lines for support.

Results: As of December 2024, the crisis line dataset has been identified and study recruitment for the national survey was completed. Data collection for all other research activities is expected to conclude by May 2025. We anticipate that study findings will be available by the end of 2025.

Conclusions: By identifying barriers to crisis line use and codeveloping solutions, this research will inform policy, service design, and training to enhance services. Ensuring PSP can access crisis line supports that are equitable, evidence-based, and integrated within mental health care systems is crucial to fostering a resilient public safety workforce and emergency response capacities at a societal level.

International registered report identifier (irrid): DERR1-10.2196/75285.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
414
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信