Anna Korompeli, Kalliopi Kydonaki, Pavlos Myrianthefs
{"title":"弥合严重疾病后整体康复的差距:系统综述。","authors":"Anna Korompeli, Kalliopi Kydonaki, Pavlos Myrianthefs","doi":"10.3390/healthcare13182324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Holistic care in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) addresses the full spectrum of patient needs-physical, emotional, psychological, social, spiritual, and environmental-to support recovery and improve long-term outcomes after critical illness.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review aimed to synthesize evidence on the effectiveness of holistic care interventions across these six dimensions of wellness in adult ICU patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. The SPICE framework was used to define the scope (Setting: ICU; Perspective: patients; Intervention: holistic care; Comparison: standard care; Evaluation: multi-dimensional outcomes). Studies published in English between 1999 and 2024 were included. Methodological quality was appraised using Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) tools.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven studies, comprising randomized controlled trials, observational, and mixed-methods designs, met the inclusion criteria. The interventions were diverse, encompassing corporeal rehabilitation, spiritual care toolkits, reflexology, early physical therapy, patient diaries, and family involvement. A narrative synthesis of these heterogeneous studies suggested potential benefits and high acceptability for various patient-centered outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The limited but promising evidence indicates that holistic care interventions may contribute positively to ICU patient recovery. The findings underscore the need for more robust, high-quality research to conclusively determine their efficacy and support their integration into standard critical care practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":12977,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare","volume":"13 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12469474/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bridging Gaps in Holistic Rehabilitation After Critical Illness: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Anna Korompeli, Kalliopi Kydonaki, Pavlos Myrianthefs\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/healthcare13182324\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Holistic care in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) addresses the full spectrum of patient needs-physical, emotional, psychological, social, spiritual, and environmental-to support recovery and improve long-term outcomes after critical illness.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review aimed to synthesize evidence on the effectiveness of holistic care interventions across these six dimensions of wellness in adult ICU patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. The SPICE framework was used to define the scope (Setting: ICU; Perspective: patients; Intervention: holistic care; Comparison: standard care; Evaluation: multi-dimensional outcomes). Studies published in English between 1999 and 2024 were included. Methodological quality was appraised using Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) tools.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven studies, comprising randomized controlled trials, observational, and mixed-methods designs, met the inclusion criteria. The interventions were diverse, encompassing corporeal rehabilitation, spiritual care toolkits, reflexology, early physical therapy, patient diaries, and family involvement. A narrative synthesis of these heterogeneous studies suggested potential benefits and high acceptability for various patient-centered outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The limited but promising evidence indicates that holistic care interventions may contribute positively to ICU patient recovery. The findings underscore the need for more robust, high-quality research to conclusively determine their efficacy and support their integration into standard critical care practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12977,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Healthcare\",\"volume\":\"13 18\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12469474/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Healthcare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13182324\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13182324","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:重症监护室(ICU)的整体护理解决了患者身体、情感、心理、社会、精神和环境等方面的全面需求,以支持危重疾病后的康复和改善长期预后。目的:本系统综述旨在对成人ICU患者在这六个健康维度上的整体护理干预的有效性进行综合证据。方法:按照PRISMA指南系统检索PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science。采用SPICE框架定义范围(设置:ICU;视角:患者;干预:整体护理;比较:标准护理;评估:多维结果)。收录了1999年至2024年间用英语发表的研究。采用乔安娜布里格斯研究所(JBI)工具评价方法学质量。结果:包括随机对照试验、观察试验和混合方法设计的7项研究符合纳入标准。干预措施多种多样,包括身体康复、精神护理工具包、反射疗法、早期物理治疗、患者日记和家庭参与。对这些异质性研究的叙述综合表明,各种以患者为中心的结果具有潜在的益处和高可接受性。结论:有限但有希望的证据表明,整体护理干预可能对ICU患者的康复有积极的作用。研究结果强调需要更有力、高质量的研究来最终确定其疗效,并支持将其纳入标准的重症监护实践。
Bridging Gaps in Holistic Rehabilitation After Critical Illness: A Systematic Review.
Background: Holistic care in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) addresses the full spectrum of patient needs-physical, emotional, psychological, social, spiritual, and environmental-to support recovery and improve long-term outcomes after critical illness.
Objective: This systematic review aimed to synthesize evidence on the effectiveness of holistic care interventions across these six dimensions of wellness in adult ICU patients.
Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. The SPICE framework was used to define the scope (Setting: ICU; Perspective: patients; Intervention: holistic care; Comparison: standard care; Evaluation: multi-dimensional outcomes). Studies published in English between 1999 and 2024 were included. Methodological quality was appraised using Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) tools.
Results: Seven studies, comprising randomized controlled trials, observational, and mixed-methods designs, met the inclusion criteria. The interventions were diverse, encompassing corporeal rehabilitation, spiritual care toolkits, reflexology, early physical therapy, patient diaries, and family involvement. A narrative synthesis of these heterogeneous studies suggested potential benefits and high acceptability for various patient-centered outcomes.
Conclusions: The limited but promising evidence indicates that holistic care interventions may contribute positively to ICU patient recovery. The findings underscore the need for more robust, high-quality research to conclusively determine their efficacy and support their integration into standard critical care practice.
期刊介绍:
Healthcare (ISSN 2227-9032) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal (free for readers), which publishes original theoretical and empirical work in the interdisciplinary area of all aspects of medicine and health care research. Healthcare publishes Original Research Articles, Reviews, Case Reports, Research Notes and Short Communications. We encourage researchers to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. For theoretical papers, full details of proofs must be provided so that the results can be checked; for experimental papers, full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Additionally, electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculations, experimental procedure, etc., can be deposited along with the publication as “Supplementary Material”.