青少年吸烟者的治疗偏好:基于应用程序与面对面治疗在共同成瘾的背景下。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Francisca López-Torrecillas, María Del Mar Arcos-Rueda, Beatriz Cobo-Rodríguez, Lucas Muñoz-López
{"title":"青少年吸烟者的治疗偏好:基于应用程序与面对面治疗在共同成瘾的背景下。","authors":"Francisca López-Torrecillas, María Del Mar Arcos-Rueda, Beatriz Cobo-Rodríguez, Lucas Muñoz-López","doi":"10.3390/healthcare13182326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Tobacco use remains a major public health concern among young adults and is often complicated by co-occurring addictive behaviors. <b>Objective:</b> This study analyzed motivation for change, assessed with the decisional balance framework, in relation to multiple addictions among young smokers seeking treatment. <b>Methods:</b> Ninety-eight participants from the University of Granada enrolled in either an app-based cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) program (n = 35) or a traditional face-to-face CBT program (n = 63). Recruitment relied on self-identification and voluntary participation. Standardized instruments were applied to measure nicotine dependence (FTND), behavioral and substance-related addictions (MULTICAGE CAD-4), cannabis dependence (SDS), and motivation for change (DBQ). Logistic and stepwise regression analyses were conducted to identify predictors of treatment choice and motivational outcomes. <b>Results:</b> Younger participants and students were more likely to choose the app-based program. Compulsive buying was linked to perceiving more disadvantages of smoking, whereas sex addiction, cannabis dependence, and other substance addictions were associated with perceiving fewer disadvantages. <b>Conclusions</b>: Treatment preferences and motivational profiles differ according to age, academic status, and co-occurring addictions. These findings highlight the need to tailor smoking cessation strategies to individual profiles and support the role of mobile health tools in engaging digitally oriented populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":12977,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare","volume":"13 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12469981/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Young Smokers' Therapy Preferences: App-Based vs. Face-to-Face Treatment in the Context of Co-Addictions.\",\"authors\":\"Francisca López-Torrecillas, María Del Mar Arcos-Rueda, Beatriz Cobo-Rodríguez, Lucas Muñoz-López\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/healthcare13182326\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Tobacco use remains a major public health concern among young adults and is often complicated by co-occurring addictive behaviors. <b>Objective:</b> This study analyzed motivation for change, assessed with the decisional balance framework, in relation to multiple addictions among young smokers seeking treatment. <b>Methods:</b> Ninety-eight participants from the University of Granada enrolled in either an app-based cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) program (n = 35) or a traditional face-to-face CBT program (n = 63). Recruitment relied on self-identification and voluntary participation. Standardized instruments were applied to measure nicotine dependence (FTND), behavioral and substance-related addictions (MULTICAGE CAD-4), cannabis dependence (SDS), and motivation for change (DBQ). Logistic and stepwise regression analyses were conducted to identify predictors of treatment choice and motivational outcomes. <b>Results:</b> Younger participants and students were more likely to choose the app-based program. Compulsive buying was linked to perceiving more disadvantages of smoking, whereas sex addiction, cannabis dependence, and other substance addictions were associated with perceiving fewer disadvantages. <b>Conclusions</b>: Treatment preferences and motivational profiles differ according to age, academic status, and co-occurring addictions. These findings highlight the need to tailor smoking cessation strategies to individual profiles and support the role of mobile health tools in engaging digitally oriented populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12977,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Healthcare\",\"volume\":\"13 18\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12469981/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Healthcare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13182326\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13182326","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:烟草使用仍然是年轻人中一个主要的公共卫生问题,并且常常因同时发生的成瘾行为而复杂化。目的:本研究分析了寻求治疗的年轻吸烟者多重成瘾的改变动机,并用决策平衡框架进行评估。方法:来自格拉纳达大学的98名参与者参加了基于应用程序的认知行为治疗(CBT)计划(n = 35)或传统的面对面CBT计划(n = 63)。招聘依靠的是自我认同和自愿参与。采用标准化仪器测量尼古丁依赖(FTND)、行为和物质相关成瘾(MULTICAGE CAD-4)、大麻依赖(SDS)和改变动机(DBQ)。进行了逻辑分析和逐步回归分析,以确定治疗选择和动机结果的预测因子。结果:年轻的参与者和学生更有可能选择基于应用程序的项目。强迫性购买与吸烟的坏处更多有关,而性成瘾、大麻依赖和其他物质成瘾则与坏处较少有关。结论:治疗偏好和动机概况因年龄、学术地位和同时发生的成瘾而异。这些发现突出表明,有必要根据个人情况制定戒烟战略,并支持移动卫生工具在吸引面向数字的人群方面发挥作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Young Smokers' Therapy Preferences: App-Based vs. Face-to-Face Treatment in the Context of Co-Addictions.

Background: Tobacco use remains a major public health concern among young adults and is often complicated by co-occurring addictive behaviors. Objective: This study analyzed motivation for change, assessed with the decisional balance framework, in relation to multiple addictions among young smokers seeking treatment. Methods: Ninety-eight participants from the University of Granada enrolled in either an app-based cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) program (n = 35) or a traditional face-to-face CBT program (n = 63). Recruitment relied on self-identification and voluntary participation. Standardized instruments were applied to measure nicotine dependence (FTND), behavioral and substance-related addictions (MULTICAGE CAD-4), cannabis dependence (SDS), and motivation for change (DBQ). Logistic and stepwise regression analyses were conducted to identify predictors of treatment choice and motivational outcomes. Results: Younger participants and students were more likely to choose the app-based program. Compulsive buying was linked to perceiving more disadvantages of smoking, whereas sex addiction, cannabis dependence, and other substance addictions were associated with perceiving fewer disadvantages. Conclusions: Treatment preferences and motivational profiles differ according to age, academic status, and co-occurring addictions. These findings highlight the need to tailor smoking cessation strategies to individual profiles and support the role of mobile health tools in engaging digitally oriented populations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Healthcare
Healthcare Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Healthcare (ISSN 2227-9032) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal (free for readers), which publishes original theoretical and empirical work in the interdisciplinary area of all aspects of medicine and health care research. Healthcare publishes Original Research Articles, Reviews, Case Reports, Research Notes and Short Communications. We encourage researchers to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. For theoretical papers, full details of proofs must be provided so that the results can be checked; for experimental papers, full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Additionally, electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculations, experimental procedure, etc., can be deposited along with the publication as “Supplementary Material”.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信