{"title":"东开普省农村卫生保健机构中卫生保健工作者对宫颈癌筛查的知识、态度和做法","authors":"Ziphelele Ncane, Laston Gonah, Guillermo Alfredo Pulido Estrada, Monwabisi Faleni, Sibusiso Cyprian Nomatshila","doi":"10.3390/healthcare13182316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction/Objectives:</b> Cervical cancer screening is a vital preventive strategy, yet the extent of healthcare workers' knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) can significantly influence its uptake, especially in rural settings. This study aimed to explore the knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding cervical cancer screening among nurses in selected rural health facilities of the Eastern Cape province, South Africa. <b>Methods:</b> A cross-sectional, quantitative study was conducted among 108 nurses selected from 12 health facilities across two districts in the Eastern Cape. All participants had received some training on cervical cancer screening. Structured questionnaires were used to assess knowledge, attitudes, and practices. Comparisons between professional nurses (higher academic qualification) and enrolled nurses (lower academic qualification) were made using appropriate statistical tests. <b>Results:</b> Findings revealed significant disparities in knowledge and attitudes between professional and enrolled nurses. Professional nurses demonstrated significantly better knowledge and more positive attitudes towards cervical cancer screening than enrolled nurses, who showed inadequate knowledge (<i>p</i> = 0.021) and negative attitudes (<i>p</i> = 0.023). Despite universal training, the level of academic qualification remained a key factor influencing KAP. <b>Conclusions:</b> Academic qualification is closely linked to knowledge and attitudes regarding cervical cancer screening among nurses. Health workforce policies and programmatic initiatives should prioritize targeted training for enrolled nurses, focusing on addressing specific knowledge and skill gaps. Tailored interventions are recommended to enhance competencies and improve cervical cancer screening practices among all nursing cadres.</p>","PeriodicalId":12977,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare","volume":"13 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12469757/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Healthcare Workers on Cervical Cancer Screening in Rural Healthcare Facilities of the Eastern Cape.\",\"authors\":\"Ziphelele Ncane, Laston Gonah, Guillermo Alfredo Pulido Estrada, Monwabisi Faleni, Sibusiso Cyprian Nomatshila\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/healthcare13182316\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Introduction/Objectives:</b> Cervical cancer screening is a vital preventive strategy, yet the extent of healthcare workers' knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) can significantly influence its uptake, especially in rural settings. This study aimed to explore the knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding cervical cancer screening among nurses in selected rural health facilities of the Eastern Cape province, South Africa. <b>Methods:</b> A cross-sectional, quantitative study was conducted among 108 nurses selected from 12 health facilities across two districts in the Eastern Cape. All participants had received some training on cervical cancer screening. Structured questionnaires were used to assess knowledge, attitudes, and practices. Comparisons between professional nurses (higher academic qualification) and enrolled nurses (lower academic qualification) were made using appropriate statistical tests. <b>Results:</b> Findings revealed significant disparities in knowledge and attitudes between professional and enrolled nurses. Professional nurses demonstrated significantly better knowledge and more positive attitudes towards cervical cancer screening than enrolled nurses, who showed inadequate knowledge (<i>p</i> = 0.021) and negative attitudes (<i>p</i> = 0.023). Despite universal training, the level of academic qualification remained a key factor influencing KAP. <b>Conclusions:</b> Academic qualification is closely linked to knowledge and attitudes regarding cervical cancer screening among nurses. Health workforce policies and programmatic initiatives should prioritize targeted training for enrolled nurses, focusing on addressing specific knowledge and skill gaps. Tailored interventions are recommended to enhance competencies and improve cervical cancer screening practices among all nursing cadres.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12977,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Healthcare\",\"volume\":\"13 18\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12469757/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Healthcare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13182316\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13182316","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Healthcare Workers on Cervical Cancer Screening in Rural Healthcare Facilities of the Eastern Cape.
Introduction/Objectives: Cervical cancer screening is a vital preventive strategy, yet the extent of healthcare workers' knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) can significantly influence its uptake, especially in rural settings. This study aimed to explore the knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding cervical cancer screening among nurses in selected rural health facilities of the Eastern Cape province, South Africa. Methods: A cross-sectional, quantitative study was conducted among 108 nurses selected from 12 health facilities across two districts in the Eastern Cape. All participants had received some training on cervical cancer screening. Structured questionnaires were used to assess knowledge, attitudes, and practices. Comparisons between professional nurses (higher academic qualification) and enrolled nurses (lower academic qualification) were made using appropriate statistical tests. Results: Findings revealed significant disparities in knowledge and attitudes between professional and enrolled nurses. Professional nurses demonstrated significantly better knowledge and more positive attitudes towards cervical cancer screening than enrolled nurses, who showed inadequate knowledge (p = 0.021) and negative attitudes (p = 0.023). Despite universal training, the level of academic qualification remained a key factor influencing KAP. Conclusions: Academic qualification is closely linked to knowledge and attitudes regarding cervical cancer screening among nurses. Health workforce policies and programmatic initiatives should prioritize targeted training for enrolled nurses, focusing on addressing specific knowledge and skill gaps. Tailored interventions are recommended to enhance competencies and improve cervical cancer screening practices among all nursing cadres.
期刊介绍:
Healthcare (ISSN 2227-9032) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal (free for readers), which publishes original theoretical and empirical work in the interdisciplinary area of all aspects of medicine and health care research. Healthcare publishes Original Research Articles, Reviews, Case Reports, Research Notes and Short Communications. We encourage researchers to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. For theoretical papers, full details of proofs must be provided so that the results can be checked; for experimental papers, full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Additionally, electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculations, experimental procedure, etc., can be deposited along with the publication as “Supplementary Material”.