导航临床疗效和法律界限:护士主导的血糖管理在重症监护中的意义。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Giuseppe Neri, Andrea Bruni, Eugenio Garofalo, Federico Longhini, Vincenzo Bosco
{"title":"导航临床疗效和法律界限:护士主导的血糖管理在重症监护中的意义。","authors":"Giuseppe Neri, Andrea Bruni, Eugenio Garofalo, Federico Longhini, Vincenzo Bosco","doi":"10.3390/healthcare13182313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Maintaining optimal blood glucose levels in critically ill patients is a cornerstone of intensive care management. Nurse-led glycemic control protocols, i.e., structured algorithms empowering trained nurses to initiate and adjust insulin therapy, are increasingly adopted to improve the timeliness and consistency of glucose regulation in the Intensive Care Unit. These protocols offer substantial clinical benefits, including faster glucose correction, enhanced adherence to institutional practices, and reduced physician burden. However, their implementation also raises significant legal and ethical concerns. The complexity of critical illness, variability in nursing expertise, and the regulatory boundaries of professional roles may compromise protocol safety and nurse protection if not carefully managed. This paper explores the evidence supporting nurse-led glycemic control, highlighting the risks of both hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia, and examines institutional strategies to mitigate associated challenges. Recommendations include protocol flexibility, rigorous nurse training, structured escalation pathways, legal endorsement, and integration with electronic health records. When grounded in strong clinical governance and legal frameworks, nurse-led protocols can enhance patient outcomes while preserving professional accountability. However, their success depends on a comprehensive, interdisciplinary approach that balances efficiency with individualized care and safeguards all practitioners involved.</p>","PeriodicalId":12977,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare","volume":"13 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12470118/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Navigating Clinical Efficacy and Legal Boundaries: Implications of Nurse-Led Glycemic Management in Critical Care.\",\"authors\":\"Giuseppe Neri, Andrea Bruni, Eugenio Garofalo, Federico Longhini, Vincenzo Bosco\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/healthcare13182313\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Maintaining optimal blood glucose levels in critically ill patients is a cornerstone of intensive care management. Nurse-led glycemic control protocols, i.e., structured algorithms empowering trained nurses to initiate and adjust insulin therapy, are increasingly adopted to improve the timeliness and consistency of glucose regulation in the Intensive Care Unit. These protocols offer substantial clinical benefits, including faster glucose correction, enhanced adherence to institutional practices, and reduced physician burden. However, their implementation also raises significant legal and ethical concerns. The complexity of critical illness, variability in nursing expertise, and the regulatory boundaries of professional roles may compromise protocol safety and nurse protection if not carefully managed. This paper explores the evidence supporting nurse-led glycemic control, highlighting the risks of both hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia, and examines institutional strategies to mitigate associated challenges. Recommendations include protocol flexibility, rigorous nurse training, structured escalation pathways, legal endorsement, and integration with electronic health records. When grounded in strong clinical governance and legal frameworks, nurse-led protocols can enhance patient outcomes while preserving professional accountability. However, their success depends on a comprehensive, interdisciplinary approach that balances efficiency with individualized care and safeguards all practitioners involved.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12977,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Healthcare\",\"volume\":\"13 18\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12470118/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Healthcare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13182313\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13182313","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

维持危重病人的最佳血糖水平是重症监护管理的基石。护士主导的血糖控制方案,即结构化算法授权训练有素的护士启动和调整胰岛素治疗,越来越多地被采用,以提高重症监护室血糖调节的及时性和一致性。这些方案提供了实质性的临床益处,包括更快的血糖校正,提高对机构实践的依从性,减轻医生负担。然而,它们的实施也引起了重大的法律和道德问题。危重疾病的复杂性,护理专业知识的可变性,以及专业角色的监管界限,如果不仔细管理,可能会危及协议安全和护士保护。本文探讨了支持护士主导血糖控制的证据,强调了高血糖和低血糖的风险,并探讨了减轻相关挑战的机构策略。建议包括协议灵活性、严格的护士培训、结构化的升级途径、法律认可以及与电子健康记录的集成。在强有力的临床治理和法律框架的基础上,护士主导的协议可以在保持专业问责制的同时提高患者的治疗效果。然而,他们的成功取决于一个全面的,跨学科的方法,平衡效率与个性化护理和保障所有从业人员参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Navigating Clinical Efficacy and Legal Boundaries: Implications of Nurse-Led Glycemic Management in Critical Care.

Navigating Clinical Efficacy and Legal Boundaries: Implications of Nurse-Led Glycemic Management in Critical Care.

Maintaining optimal blood glucose levels in critically ill patients is a cornerstone of intensive care management. Nurse-led glycemic control protocols, i.e., structured algorithms empowering trained nurses to initiate and adjust insulin therapy, are increasingly adopted to improve the timeliness and consistency of glucose regulation in the Intensive Care Unit. These protocols offer substantial clinical benefits, including faster glucose correction, enhanced adherence to institutional practices, and reduced physician burden. However, their implementation also raises significant legal and ethical concerns. The complexity of critical illness, variability in nursing expertise, and the regulatory boundaries of professional roles may compromise protocol safety and nurse protection if not carefully managed. This paper explores the evidence supporting nurse-led glycemic control, highlighting the risks of both hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia, and examines institutional strategies to mitigate associated challenges. Recommendations include protocol flexibility, rigorous nurse training, structured escalation pathways, legal endorsement, and integration with electronic health records. When grounded in strong clinical governance and legal frameworks, nurse-led protocols can enhance patient outcomes while preserving professional accountability. However, their success depends on a comprehensive, interdisciplinary approach that balances efficiency with individualized care and safeguards all practitioners involved.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Healthcare
Healthcare Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Healthcare (ISSN 2227-9032) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal (free for readers), which publishes original theoretical and empirical work in the interdisciplinary area of all aspects of medicine and health care research. Healthcare publishes Original Research Articles, Reviews, Case Reports, Research Notes and Short Communications. We encourage researchers to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. For theoretical papers, full details of proofs must be provided so that the results can be checked; for experimental papers, full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Additionally, electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculations, experimental procedure, etc., can be deposited along with the publication as “Supplementary Material”.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信