评估加沙地带受冲突影响医院的疼痛管理:一项前瞻性观察研究。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Belal Aldabbour, Wasim Younis, Kareem Alrawabdeh, Anas Alhindi, Mohammed Nijem, Saleh Al Fayoumi, Mohammed Al Aidy, Othman Nassar, Abd Elkarem El Masry, Abdullah Tabaza, Diya Al Ashqar, Ibrahim Al Salhi, Latefa Ali Dardas
{"title":"评估加沙地带受冲突影响医院的疼痛管理:一项前瞻性观察研究。","authors":"Belal Aldabbour, Wasim Younis, Kareem Alrawabdeh, Anas Alhindi, Mohammed Nijem, Saleh Al Fayoumi, Mohammed Al Aidy, Othman Nassar, Abd Elkarem El Masry, Abdullah Tabaza, Diya Al Ashqar, Ibrahim Al Salhi, Latefa Ali Dardas","doi":"10.1186/s12873-025-01345-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pain is one of the most distressing symptoms for trauma patients and serves as a cornerstone of acute trauma care. The healthcare system in the Gaza Strip has been devastated by the violent war that erupted in October 2023, further worsening the shortages and limitations it already experienced due to repeated assaults and a prolonged siege. The war-wounded are thus prone to suffer from inadequate pain management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective observational study consecutively recruited 100 war trauma victims from two tertiary hospitals in the Gaza Strip. During the first four days of hospitalization (Days 0-3), the study evaluated the patients' subjective pain experiences before and after analgesia using the numerical rating scale (NRS), and assessed pain evaluation, documentation, and management practices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most participants were young males who underwent surgical interventions on their first day of hospitalization. None of the patients received a formal pain assessment, and nearly two-thirds of patient records lacked documentation of pain. The most frequently prescribed analgesics were diclofenac (33%), paracetamol 1 g (27%), and a combination of paracetamol 1 g with diclofenac 75 mg (18%), while opioid use was severely limited. Additionally, none of the patient records included on-demand analgesia. Pain relief was reported in 85%, 92%, 93%, and 91% following analgesia administration on admission days 0-3, respectively. The decrease in pain scores was significant across the studied days (p < 0.001), with average reductions of 4.26 points on admission day, 4.61 points on Day 1, 4.53 points on Day 2, and 4.27 points on Day 3.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For most patients, the mean pain intensity decreased despite incomplete pain assessments and very limited opioid use. The study highlights the urgent need for context-specific improvements in pain assessment, documentation, and access to essential analgesics in conflict settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":9002,"journal":{"name":"BMC Emergency Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"189"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12465580/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating pain management in the Gaza Strip's conflict-affected hospitals: a prospective observational study.\",\"authors\":\"Belal Aldabbour, Wasim Younis, Kareem Alrawabdeh, Anas Alhindi, Mohammed Nijem, Saleh Al Fayoumi, Mohammed Al Aidy, Othman Nassar, Abd Elkarem El Masry, Abdullah Tabaza, Diya Al Ashqar, Ibrahim Al Salhi, Latefa Ali Dardas\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12873-025-01345-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pain is one of the most distressing symptoms for trauma patients and serves as a cornerstone of acute trauma care. The healthcare system in the Gaza Strip has been devastated by the violent war that erupted in October 2023, further worsening the shortages and limitations it already experienced due to repeated assaults and a prolonged siege. The war-wounded are thus prone to suffer from inadequate pain management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective observational study consecutively recruited 100 war trauma victims from two tertiary hospitals in the Gaza Strip. During the first four days of hospitalization (Days 0-3), the study evaluated the patients' subjective pain experiences before and after analgesia using the numerical rating scale (NRS), and assessed pain evaluation, documentation, and management practices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most participants were young males who underwent surgical interventions on their first day of hospitalization. None of the patients received a formal pain assessment, and nearly two-thirds of patient records lacked documentation of pain. The most frequently prescribed analgesics were diclofenac (33%), paracetamol 1 g (27%), and a combination of paracetamol 1 g with diclofenac 75 mg (18%), while opioid use was severely limited. Additionally, none of the patient records included on-demand analgesia. Pain relief was reported in 85%, 92%, 93%, and 91% following analgesia administration on admission days 0-3, respectively. The decrease in pain scores was significant across the studied days (p < 0.001), with average reductions of 4.26 points on admission day, 4.61 points on Day 1, 4.53 points on Day 2, and 4.27 points on Day 3.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For most patients, the mean pain intensity decreased despite incomplete pain assessments and very limited opioid use. The study highlights the urgent need for context-specific improvements in pain assessment, documentation, and access to essential analgesics in conflict settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9002,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"189\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12465580/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-025-01345-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-025-01345-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:疼痛是创伤患者最痛苦的症状之一,也是急性创伤护理的基石。2023年10月爆发的暴力战争摧毁了加沙地带的医疗保健系统,使其因反复袭击和长期围困而已经面临的短缺和限制进一步恶化。因此,战争伤员容易遭受疼痛管理不足的痛苦。方法:前瞻性观察研究从加沙地带的两家三级医院连续招募了100名战争创伤受害者。在住院的前四天(0-3天),研究采用数值评定量表(NRS)评估患者镇痛前后的主观疼痛体验,并评估疼痛评估、文献记录和管理实践。结果:大多数参与者是年轻男性,他们在住院的第一天接受了手术干预。没有患者接受过正式的疼痛评估,近三分之二的患者记录缺乏疼痛记录。最常用的镇痛药是双氯芬酸(33%)、扑热息痛1 g(27%)和扑热息痛1 g与双氯芬酸75 mg(18%)的组合,而阿片类药物的使用受到严重限制。此外,没有患者记录包括按需镇痛。入院第0-3天镇痛后疼痛缓解率分别为85%、92%、93%和91%。结论:对于大多数患者,尽管疼痛评估不完整且阿片类药物使用非常有限,但平均疼痛强度仍有所下降。该研究强调了在冲突环境中对疼痛评估、记录和获得基本镇痛药的具体情况进行改进的迫切需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating pain management in the Gaza Strip's conflict-affected hospitals: a prospective observational study.

Background: Pain is one of the most distressing symptoms for trauma patients and serves as a cornerstone of acute trauma care. The healthcare system in the Gaza Strip has been devastated by the violent war that erupted in October 2023, further worsening the shortages and limitations it already experienced due to repeated assaults and a prolonged siege. The war-wounded are thus prone to suffer from inadequate pain management.

Methods: A prospective observational study consecutively recruited 100 war trauma victims from two tertiary hospitals in the Gaza Strip. During the first four days of hospitalization (Days 0-3), the study evaluated the patients' subjective pain experiences before and after analgesia using the numerical rating scale (NRS), and assessed pain evaluation, documentation, and management practices.

Results: Most participants were young males who underwent surgical interventions on their first day of hospitalization. None of the patients received a formal pain assessment, and nearly two-thirds of patient records lacked documentation of pain. The most frequently prescribed analgesics were diclofenac (33%), paracetamol 1 g (27%), and a combination of paracetamol 1 g with diclofenac 75 mg (18%), while opioid use was severely limited. Additionally, none of the patient records included on-demand analgesia. Pain relief was reported in 85%, 92%, 93%, and 91% following analgesia administration on admission days 0-3, respectively. The decrease in pain scores was significant across the studied days (p < 0.001), with average reductions of 4.26 points on admission day, 4.61 points on Day 1, 4.53 points on Day 2, and 4.27 points on Day 3.

Conclusions: For most patients, the mean pain intensity decreased despite incomplete pain assessments and very limited opioid use. The study highlights the urgent need for context-specific improvements in pain assessment, documentation, and access to essential analgesics in conflict settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Emergency Medicine
BMC Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
8.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Emergency Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all urgent and emergency aspects of medicine, in both practice and basic research. In addition, the journal covers aspects of disaster medicine and medicine in special locations, such as conflict areas and military medicine, together with articles concerning healthcare services in the emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信