基于abcc1的风险模型可有效诊断晚期结直肠癌腹膜同步转移。

IF 6.8 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Wenqing Xie, Qianxin Luo, Zhimei Ou, Wanjun Liu, Minghan Huang, Qian Wang, Ping Lan, Daici Chen
{"title":"基于abcc1的风险模型可有效诊断晚期结直肠癌腹膜同步转移。","authors":"Wenqing Xie, Qianxin Luo, Zhimei Ou, Wanjun Liu, Minghan Huang, Qian Wang, Ping Lan, Daici Chen","doi":"10.1038/s41416-025-03203-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The presence of peritoneal metastasis (PM) in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients indicates an advanced CRC stage. Prompt diagnosis and early PM detection are difficult, and the underlying mechanisms are unclear, resulting in limited treatment options and unsatisfactory therapeutic effects. We aimed to identify applicable biomarkers for accurately diagnosing synchronous PM in CRC patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Differentially expressed genes between synchronous and non-synchronous PM groups were identified via label-free proteomic analysis of primary tumors from 31 CRC patients. Quantitative real-time PCR, multiplex and conventional immunohistochemistry were used to validate gene expression. We attempted to construct a logistic regression risk model for the diagnosis of PM, which was tested in a training cohort and validated in an independent cohort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Utilizing the results from multi-omics, we established an ABCC1-based risk model. In CRC patients with imaging-negative diagnoses, the model identified patients with metastases including PM (AUC = 0.892, 95% CI: 0.840-0.944) or those with PM only (AUC = 0.859, 95% CI: 0.794-0.924); these results were validated in an independent cohort of patients with metastases including PM (AUC = 0.831, 95% CI: 0.729-0.933) or PM only (AUC = 0.819, 95% CI: 0.702-0.936). In CRC patients with CEA-negative, this model more effectively distinguishes those with exclusive peritoneal involvement, with consistent results across both training (AUC = 0.913, 95% CI: 0.854-0.972) and validation (AUC = 0.869, 95% CI: 0.795-0.943) cohorts. Additionally, in CRC patients with PM, low ABCC1 may serve as a predictive marker for chemotherapy efficacy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ABCC1-based risk model effectively predicts PM in CRC, complementing traditional diagnostics. ABCC1 may serve as a predictive marker for chemotherapy efficacy in PM.</p>","PeriodicalId":9243,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An ABCC1-based risk model is effective in the diagnosis of synchronous peritoneal metastasis in advanced colorectal cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Wenqing Xie, Qianxin Luo, Zhimei Ou, Wanjun Liu, Minghan Huang, Qian Wang, Ping Lan, Daici Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41416-025-03203-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The presence of peritoneal metastasis (PM) in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients indicates an advanced CRC stage. Prompt diagnosis and early PM detection are difficult, and the underlying mechanisms are unclear, resulting in limited treatment options and unsatisfactory therapeutic effects. We aimed to identify applicable biomarkers for accurately diagnosing synchronous PM in CRC patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Differentially expressed genes between synchronous and non-synchronous PM groups were identified via label-free proteomic analysis of primary tumors from 31 CRC patients. Quantitative real-time PCR, multiplex and conventional immunohistochemistry were used to validate gene expression. We attempted to construct a logistic regression risk model for the diagnosis of PM, which was tested in a training cohort and validated in an independent cohort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Utilizing the results from multi-omics, we established an ABCC1-based risk model. In CRC patients with imaging-negative diagnoses, the model identified patients with metastases including PM (AUC = 0.892, 95% CI: 0.840-0.944) or those with PM only (AUC = 0.859, 95% CI: 0.794-0.924); these results were validated in an independent cohort of patients with metastases including PM (AUC = 0.831, 95% CI: 0.729-0.933) or PM only (AUC = 0.819, 95% CI: 0.702-0.936). In CRC patients with CEA-negative, this model more effectively distinguishes those with exclusive peritoneal involvement, with consistent results across both training (AUC = 0.913, 95% CI: 0.854-0.972) and validation (AUC = 0.869, 95% CI: 0.795-0.943) cohorts. Additionally, in CRC patients with PM, low ABCC1 may serve as a predictive marker for chemotherapy efficacy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ABCC1-based risk model effectively predicts PM in CRC, complementing traditional diagnostics. ABCC1 may serve as a predictive marker for chemotherapy efficacy in PM.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9243,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Cancer\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-025-03203-1\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-025-03203-1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:结直肠癌(CRC)患者腹膜转移(PM)的存在表明结直肠癌晚期。及时诊断和早期发现PM是困难的,潜在的机制尚不清楚,导致有限的治疗选择和治疗效果不理想。我们的目的是确定适用的生物标志物,以准确诊断CRC患者的同步PM。方法:通过对31例结直肠癌患者原发肿瘤的无标记蛋白质组学分析,鉴定同步和非同步PM组之间的差异表达基因。采用实时荧光定量PCR、多重荧光和常规免疫组织化学方法验证基因表达。我们试图构建一个用于诊断PM的逻辑回归风险模型,并在培训队列中进行了测试,并在独立队列中进行了验证。结果:利用多组学的结果,我们建立了基于abcc1的风险模型。在影像学诊断为阴性的CRC患者中,该模型识别出转移患者包括PM (AUC = 0.892, 95% CI: 0.840-0.944)或仅PM (AUC = 0.859, 95% CI: 0.794-0.924);这些结果在包括PM (AUC = 0.831, 95% CI: 0.729-0.933)或仅PM (AUC = 0.819, 95% CI: 0.702-0.936)转移患者的独立队列中得到验证。在cea阴性的结直肠癌患者中,该模型更有效地区分了仅累及腹膜的患者,训练组(AUC = 0.913, 95% CI: 0.854-0.972)和验证组(AUC = 0.869, 95% CI: 0.795-0.943)的结果一致。此外,在伴有PM的结直肠癌患者中,低ABCC1可能作为化疗疗效的预测指标。结论:基于abcc1的风险模型可有效预测结直肠癌的PM,补充了传统的诊断方法。ABCC1可作为PM化疗疗效的预测指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An ABCC1-based risk model is effective in the diagnosis of synchronous peritoneal metastasis in advanced colorectal cancer.

Background: The presence of peritoneal metastasis (PM) in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients indicates an advanced CRC stage. Prompt diagnosis and early PM detection are difficult, and the underlying mechanisms are unclear, resulting in limited treatment options and unsatisfactory therapeutic effects. We aimed to identify applicable biomarkers for accurately diagnosing synchronous PM in CRC patients.

Methods: Differentially expressed genes between synchronous and non-synchronous PM groups were identified via label-free proteomic analysis of primary tumors from 31 CRC patients. Quantitative real-time PCR, multiplex and conventional immunohistochemistry were used to validate gene expression. We attempted to construct a logistic regression risk model for the diagnosis of PM, which was tested in a training cohort and validated in an independent cohort.

Results: Utilizing the results from multi-omics, we established an ABCC1-based risk model. In CRC patients with imaging-negative diagnoses, the model identified patients with metastases including PM (AUC = 0.892, 95% CI: 0.840-0.944) or those with PM only (AUC = 0.859, 95% CI: 0.794-0.924); these results were validated in an independent cohort of patients with metastases including PM (AUC = 0.831, 95% CI: 0.729-0.933) or PM only (AUC = 0.819, 95% CI: 0.702-0.936). In CRC patients with CEA-negative, this model more effectively distinguishes those with exclusive peritoneal involvement, with consistent results across both training (AUC = 0.913, 95% CI: 0.854-0.972) and validation (AUC = 0.869, 95% CI: 0.795-0.943) cohorts. Additionally, in CRC patients with PM, low ABCC1 may serve as a predictive marker for chemotherapy efficacy.

Conclusions: The ABCC1-based risk model effectively predicts PM in CRC, complementing traditional diagnostics. ABCC1 may serve as a predictive marker for chemotherapy efficacy in PM.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Cancer
British Journal of Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
1.10%
发文量
383
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Cancer is one of the most-cited general cancer journals, publishing significant advances in translational and clinical cancer research.It also publishes high-quality reviews and thought-provoking comment on all aspects of cancer prevention,diagnosis and treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信