Jonathan Saenger, Jasmin Happe, Caroline Maier, Bjarne Kerber, Ela Uenal, Denise Bos, Thomas Frauenfelder, Andreas Boss
{"title":"肺移植受者的乳房x线摄影钙化:流行和演变。","authors":"Jonathan Saenger, Jasmin Happe, Caroline Maier, Bjarne Kerber, Ela Uenal, Denise Bos, Thomas Frauenfelder, Andreas Boss","doi":"10.3390/biomedicines13092318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To investigate the prevalence and progression of macrocalcifications or sporadic scattered microcalcifications, breast arterial calcifications (BAC) and grouped microcalcifications in women undergoing lung transplantation (LTX). <b>Materials and Methods:</b> In this retrospective single-center cohort study, 176 adult female patients who underwent mammography between 2008 and 2025 were included: 82 LTX recipients and 94 age-matched controls. Mammographic findings were assessed using standardized BI-RADS criteria and a visual BAC scoring system. Clinical and demographic data were extracted from electronic medical records. Multivariable logistic regression and cumulative incidence analysis were used to evaluate associations and progression patterns. Interobserver agreement was assessed using Fleiss' kappa. <b>Results:</b> BAC and grouped microcalcifications were significantly more prevalent in the LTX group in the last mammography (BAC: OR 6.57, 95% CI 2.34-20.7; microcalcifications: OR 14.6, 95% CI 3.93-73.9; both <i>p</i> < 0.001). Cumulative incidence analysis showed accelerated progression of BAC and grouped microcalcifications in LTX recipients (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.01), while macrocalcifications or sporadic scattered microcalcification progression did not differ significantly. BAC was often more extensive and potentially mimicked malignant findings. Interobserver agreement was highest for the four-level BAC scoring system (κ = 0.61), followed by BAC presence (κ = 0.59) and macrocalcifications (κ = 0.51), while grouped microcalcifications showed only fair agreement (κ = 0.33). <b>Conclusions:</b> Lung transplant recipients demonstrate significantly higher prevalence and faster progression of BAC and grouped microcalcifications compared to controls, complicating mammographic interpretation. Given their elevated risk of aggressive malignancies and diagnostic overlap between benign and suspicious calcifications, transplant recipients may benefit from tailored screening strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":8937,"journal":{"name":"Biomedicines","volume":"13 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12467320/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mammographic Calcifications in Lung Transplant Recipients: Prevalence and Evolution.\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan Saenger, Jasmin Happe, Caroline Maier, Bjarne Kerber, Ela Uenal, Denise Bos, Thomas Frauenfelder, Andreas Boss\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/biomedicines13092318\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To investigate the prevalence and progression of macrocalcifications or sporadic scattered microcalcifications, breast arterial calcifications (BAC) and grouped microcalcifications in women undergoing lung transplantation (LTX). <b>Materials and Methods:</b> In this retrospective single-center cohort study, 176 adult female patients who underwent mammography between 2008 and 2025 were included: 82 LTX recipients and 94 age-matched controls. Mammographic findings were assessed using standardized BI-RADS criteria and a visual BAC scoring system. Clinical and demographic data were extracted from electronic medical records. Multivariable logistic regression and cumulative incidence analysis were used to evaluate associations and progression patterns. Interobserver agreement was assessed using Fleiss' kappa. <b>Results:</b> BAC and grouped microcalcifications were significantly more prevalent in the LTX group in the last mammography (BAC: OR 6.57, 95% CI 2.34-20.7; microcalcifications: OR 14.6, 95% CI 3.93-73.9; both <i>p</i> < 0.001). Cumulative incidence analysis showed accelerated progression of BAC and grouped microcalcifications in LTX recipients (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.01), while macrocalcifications or sporadic scattered microcalcification progression did not differ significantly. BAC was often more extensive and potentially mimicked malignant findings. Interobserver agreement was highest for the four-level BAC scoring system (κ = 0.61), followed by BAC presence (κ = 0.59) and macrocalcifications (κ = 0.51), while grouped microcalcifications showed only fair agreement (κ = 0.33). <b>Conclusions:</b> Lung transplant recipients demonstrate significantly higher prevalence and faster progression of BAC and grouped microcalcifications compared to controls, complicating mammographic interpretation. Given their elevated risk of aggressive malignancies and diagnostic overlap between benign and suspicious calcifications, transplant recipients may benefit from tailored screening strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8937,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomedicines\",\"volume\":\"13 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12467320/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomedicines\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13092318\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedicines","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13092318","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:探讨肺移植(LTX)术后大钙化或散在微钙化、乳腺动脉钙化(BAC)及分组微钙化的发生率及进展情况。材料和方法:在这项回顾性单中心队列研究中,纳入了176名在2008年至2025年间接受乳房x光检查的成年女性患者:82名LTX接受者和94名年龄匹配的对照组。使用标准化的BI-RADS标准和视觉BAC评分系统评估乳房x线检查结果。临床和人口统计数据从电子病历中提取。多变量logistic回归和累积发生率分析用于评估相关性和进展模式。使用Fleiss kappa评估观察者间的一致性。结果:在最后一次乳房x光检查中,LTX组BAC和分组微钙化明显更普遍(BAC: OR 6.57, 95% CI 2.34-20.7;微钙化:OR 14.6, 95% CI 3.93-73.9, p均< 0.001)。累积发生率分析显示,LTX受体BAC和分组微钙化进展加快(p≤0.01),而大钙化或零星分散微钙化进展无显著差异。BAC通常更广泛,并可能模仿恶性肿瘤的发现。四级BAC评分系统的观察者间一致性最高(κ = 0.61),其次是BAC存在(κ = 0.59)和大钙化(κ = 0.51),而分组微钙化仅显示一般一致性(κ = 0.33)。结论:与对照组相比,肺移植受者表现出明显更高的患病率和更快的BAC和分组微钙化进展,使乳房x线摄影解释复杂化。考虑到他们侵袭性恶性肿瘤的高风险和良性和可疑钙化的诊断重叠,移植受者可能受益于量身定制的筛查策略。
Mammographic Calcifications in Lung Transplant Recipients: Prevalence and Evolution.
Objective: To investigate the prevalence and progression of macrocalcifications or sporadic scattered microcalcifications, breast arterial calcifications (BAC) and grouped microcalcifications in women undergoing lung transplantation (LTX). Materials and Methods: In this retrospective single-center cohort study, 176 adult female patients who underwent mammography between 2008 and 2025 were included: 82 LTX recipients and 94 age-matched controls. Mammographic findings were assessed using standardized BI-RADS criteria and a visual BAC scoring system. Clinical and demographic data were extracted from electronic medical records. Multivariable logistic regression and cumulative incidence analysis were used to evaluate associations and progression patterns. Interobserver agreement was assessed using Fleiss' kappa. Results: BAC and grouped microcalcifications were significantly more prevalent in the LTX group in the last mammography (BAC: OR 6.57, 95% CI 2.34-20.7; microcalcifications: OR 14.6, 95% CI 3.93-73.9; both p < 0.001). Cumulative incidence analysis showed accelerated progression of BAC and grouped microcalcifications in LTX recipients (p ≤ 0.01), while macrocalcifications or sporadic scattered microcalcification progression did not differ significantly. BAC was often more extensive and potentially mimicked malignant findings. Interobserver agreement was highest for the four-level BAC scoring system (κ = 0.61), followed by BAC presence (κ = 0.59) and macrocalcifications (κ = 0.51), while grouped microcalcifications showed only fair agreement (κ = 0.33). Conclusions: Lung transplant recipients demonstrate significantly higher prevalence and faster progression of BAC and grouped microcalcifications compared to controls, complicating mammographic interpretation. Given their elevated risk of aggressive malignancies and diagnostic overlap between benign and suspicious calcifications, transplant recipients may benefit from tailored screening strategies.
BiomedicinesBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-General Biochemistry,Genetics and Molecular Biology
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.50%
发文量
2823
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍:
Biomedicines (ISSN 2227-9059; CODEN: BIOMID) is an international, scientific, open access journal on biomedicines published quarterly online by MDPI.