Mario Matabele, Aaron Litvak, Baqir Kedwai, Joshua T Geiger, Adam J Doyle
{"title":"在纽约州,选择性开放aaa修补容量切断对患者获得外科护理的影响。","authors":"Mario Matabele, Aaron Litvak, Baqir Kedwai, Joshua T Geiger, Adam J Doyle","doi":"10.1016/j.avsg.2025.09.030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Volume-outcome relationships have established improved outcomes for patients undergoing open AAA repair if performed by surgeons with a yearly volume of ≥7 open aortic procedures and at hospitals with a perioperative mortality rate of <5%. However, the impact of this recommendation on patients' driving distance and access to surgery is unknown. This study seeks to quantify the impact on patients' access to care in such high-volume centers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing elective open AAA repair were identified using the New York SPARCS database from 2003 to 2014. An average of 7 open aortic repairs per year was considered high-volume. Travel distances to hospitals were obtained using patient addresses via Google Distance Matrix and compared before and after surgeon and hospital standards were implemented. Patient addresses were stratified as urban or rural based on USDA Rural-Urban Commuting Area cutoffs. Comparisons were performed using both geospatial data analysis by county and Mann-Whitney U-test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>6,337 patients who underwent open AAA had identifiable addresses for which distances to their surgical center could be obtained. Only 2,077 (32.8%) patients were treated by surgeons and at centers that met previously proposed criteria. If recommended guidelines were implemented, the travel distances would change from 8.1 (IQR:3.7-15.3) to 11.1 (IQR:6.2-18.5) miles (p<0.001) for patients in urban locations (n=3024). For patients who live in rural locations (n=1236) the travel distances would change from 31.3(IQR:12.8-52.3) to 39.4 (IQR:23.2-61.1) (p<0.001) (Figure 1).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These data show that travel times would increase for open AAA patients should volume guidelines be implemented. Alternative solutions, such as allowing lower volume surgeons who operate at centers with high volume surgeons, should be considered to increase patient access to care.</p>","PeriodicalId":8061,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"IMPACT OF ELECTIVE OPEN AAA REPAIR VOLUME CUTOFFS ON PATIENT ACCESS TO SURGICAL CARE IN NEW YORK STATE.\",\"authors\":\"Mario Matabele, Aaron Litvak, Baqir Kedwai, Joshua T Geiger, Adam J Doyle\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.avsg.2025.09.030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Volume-outcome relationships have established improved outcomes for patients undergoing open AAA repair if performed by surgeons with a yearly volume of ≥7 open aortic procedures and at hospitals with a perioperative mortality rate of <5%. However, the impact of this recommendation on patients' driving distance and access to surgery is unknown. This study seeks to quantify the impact on patients' access to care in such high-volume centers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing elective open AAA repair were identified using the New York SPARCS database from 2003 to 2014. An average of 7 open aortic repairs per year was considered high-volume. Travel distances to hospitals were obtained using patient addresses via Google Distance Matrix and compared before and after surgeon and hospital standards were implemented. Patient addresses were stratified as urban or rural based on USDA Rural-Urban Commuting Area cutoffs. Comparisons were performed using both geospatial data analysis by county and Mann-Whitney U-test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>6,337 patients who underwent open AAA had identifiable addresses for which distances to their surgical center could be obtained. Only 2,077 (32.8%) patients were treated by surgeons and at centers that met previously proposed criteria. If recommended guidelines were implemented, the travel distances would change from 8.1 (IQR:3.7-15.3) to 11.1 (IQR:6.2-18.5) miles (p<0.001) for patients in urban locations (n=3024). For patients who live in rural locations (n=1236) the travel distances would change from 31.3(IQR:12.8-52.3) to 39.4 (IQR:23.2-61.1) (p<0.001) (Figure 1).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These data show that travel times would increase for open AAA patients should volume guidelines be implemented. Alternative solutions, such as allowing lower volume surgeons who operate at centers with high volume surgeons, should be considered to increase patient access to care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8061,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of vascular surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of vascular surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2025.09.030\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of vascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2025.09.030","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
IMPACT OF ELECTIVE OPEN AAA REPAIR VOLUME CUTOFFS ON PATIENT ACCESS TO SURGICAL CARE IN NEW YORK STATE.
Objectives: Volume-outcome relationships have established improved outcomes for patients undergoing open AAA repair if performed by surgeons with a yearly volume of ≥7 open aortic procedures and at hospitals with a perioperative mortality rate of <5%. However, the impact of this recommendation on patients' driving distance and access to surgery is unknown. This study seeks to quantify the impact on patients' access to care in such high-volume centers.
Methods: Patients undergoing elective open AAA repair were identified using the New York SPARCS database from 2003 to 2014. An average of 7 open aortic repairs per year was considered high-volume. Travel distances to hospitals were obtained using patient addresses via Google Distance Matrix and compared before and after surgeon and hospital standards were implemented. Patient addresses were stratified as urban or rural based on USDA Rural-Urban Commuting Area cutoffs. Comparisons were performed using both geospatial data analysis by county and Mann-Whitney U-test.
Results: 6,337 patients who underwent open AAA had identifiable addresses for which distances to their surgical center could be obtained. Only 2,077 (32.8%) patients were treated by surgeons and at centers that met previously proposed criteria. If recommended guidelines were implemented, the travel distances would change from 8.1 (IQR:3.7-15.3) to 11.1 (IQR:6.2-18.5) miles (p<0.001) for patients in urban locations (n=3024). For patients who live in rural locations (n=1236) the travel distances would change from 31.3(IQR:12.8-52.3) to 39.4 (IQR:23.2-61.1) (p<0.001) (Figure 1).
Conclusions: These data show that travel times would increase for open AAA patients should volume guidelines be implemented. Alternative solutions, such as allowing lower volume surgeons who operate at centers with high volume surgeons, should be considered to increase patient access to care.
期刊介绍:
Annals of Vascular Surgery, published eight times a year, invites original manuscripts reporting clinical and experimental work in vascular surgery for peer review. Articles may be submitted for the following sections of the journal:
Clinical Research (reports of clinical series, new drug or medical device trials)
Basic Science Research (new investigations, experimental work)
Case Reports (reports on a limited series of patients)
General Reviews (scholarly review of the existing literature on a relevant topic)
Developments in Endovascular and Endoscopic Surgery
Selected Techniques (technical maneuvers)
Historical Notes (interesting vignettes from the early days of vascular surgery)
Editorials/Correspondence