钢架- lft玻璃纤维增强钢化面层复合模板抗弯性能研究

IF 1.4 4区 工程技术 Q3 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Xu Yan, Dingjian Zhang, Bing Li, Jiaxu Li
{"title":"钢架- lft玻璃纤维增强钢化面层复合模板抗弯性能研究","authors":"Xu Yan,&nbsp;Dingjian Zhang,&nbsp;Bing Li,&nbsp;Jiaxu Li","doi":"10.1007/s13296-025-00967-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>To address the unsuitability of traditional construction formwork for the complex conditions of pipeline corridor projects, and after considering factors such as cost and quality, LFT (Long Fiber Thermoplastic) tempered boards were selected as the face material. These were combined with steel frames of higher structural strength to create a steel frame-LFT glass fiber reinforced tempered surface layer composite formwork. This study includes both experimental testing and numerical simulations of the pipeline corridor system, analyzing the effects of various parameters on performance. The experiment focused on the influence of two variables—support spacing and the number of support points—on the formwork's load-bearing performance, comparing it with traditional steel formwork. The results showed that the failure mode was characterized by unstable bending, with the panel bending and the steel frame bulging, and some specimens showing cracks at mid-span. As the support spacing increased, the ultimate load-bearing capacity and stiffness of the steel frame-LFT glass fiber reinforced surface composite formwork decreased. Fewer support points led to a more significant reduction in both load-bearing capacity and stiffness. Compared to traditional steel formwork, the steel frame-LFT glass fiber reinforced surface composite formwork demonstrated similar load-bearing capacity and stiffness, while being lighter in weight and having a higher turnover rate. The steel frame-LFT glass fiber reinforced surface composite formwork exhibited excellent performance in terms of load-bearing capacity and initial stiffness, meeting the strength requirements for construction formwork. It can replace traditional steel formwork in practical applications, particularly in environments with shorter support distances. Based on the combined results of the experiments and numerical simulations, the optimal support spacing and number of support points were identified. These findings offer valuable insights for the design and application of such formwork systems in future engineering projects.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":596,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Steel Structures","volume":"25 3","pages":"715 - 729"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Study on the Bending Performance of Steel Frame-LFT Glass Fiber Reinforced Tempered Surface Layer Composite Formwork\",\"authors\":\"Xu Yan,&nbsp;Dingjian Zhang,&nbsp;Bing Li,&nbsp;Jiaxu Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13296-025-00967-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>To address the unsuitability of traditional construction formwork for the complex conditions of pipeline corridor projects, and after considering factors such as cost and quality, LFT (Long Fiber Thermoplastic) tempered boards were selected as the face material. These were combined with steel frames of higher structural strength to create a steel frame-LFT glass fiber reinforced tempered surface layer composite formwork. This study includes both experimental testing and numerical simulations of the pipeline corridor system, analyzing the effects of various parameters on performance. The experiment focused on the influence of two variables—support spacing and the number of support points—on the formwork's load-bearing performance, comparing it with traditional steel formwork. The results showed that the failure mode was characterized by unstable bending, with the panel bending and the steel frame bulging, and some specimens showing cracks at mid-span. As the support spacing increased, the ultimate load-bearing capacity and stiffness of the steel frame-LFT glass fiber reinforced surface composite formwork decreased. Fewer support points led to a more significant reduction in both load-bearing capacity and stiffness. Compared to traditional steel formwork, the steel frame-LFT glass fiber reinforced surface composite formwork demonstrated similar load-bearing capacity and stiffness, while being lighter in weight and having a higher turnover rate. The steel frame-LFT glass fiber reinforced surface composite formwork exhibited excellent performance in terms of load-bearing capacity and initial stiffness, meeting the strength requirements for construction formwork. It can replace traditional steel formwork in practical applications, particularly in environments with shorter support distances. Based on the combined results of the experiments and numerical simulations, the optimal support spacing and number of support points were identified. These findings offer valuable insights for the design and application of such formwork systems in future engineering projects.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":596,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Steel Structures\",\"volume\":\"25 3\",\"pages\":\"715 - 729\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Steel Structures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13296-025-00967-3\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Steel Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13296-025-00967-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为解决传统建筑模板不适合复杂条件的管道走廊工程,综合考虑成本和质量等因素,选择LFT(长纤维热塑性塑料)钢化板作为面材。这些与结构强度更高的钢框架相结合,形成了钢框架- lft玻璃纤维增强回火表面层复合模板。本文对管道走廊系统进行了实验测试和数值模拟,分析了各参数对系统性能的影响。试验重点研究了支撑间距和支撑点个数两个变量对模板承载性能的影响,并与传统钢模板进行了比较。结果表明:该结构破坏模式以不稳定弯曲为特征,面板弯曲,钢框架鼓形,部分试件在跨中出现裂缝;随着支撑间距的增大,钢框架- lft玻璃纤维增强表面复合模板的极限承载能力和刚度降低。支撑点越少,承载能力和刚度降低越显著。与传统钢模板相比,钢架- lft玻璃纤维增强表面复合模板具有相似的承载能力和刚度,同时重量更轻,周转率更高。钢框架- lft玻璃纤维增强表面复合模板在承载能力和初始刚度方面表现出优异的性能,满足建筑模板的强度要求。在实际应用中,特别是在支撑距离较短的环境中,它可以代替传统的钢模板。根据试验与数值模拟相结合的结果,确定了最优支护间距和支撑点个数。这些发现为今后工程项目中模板系统的设计和应用提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Study on the Bending Performance of Steel Frame-LFT Glass Fiber Reinforced Tempered Surface Layer Composite Formwork

To address the unsuitability of traditional construction formwork for the complex conditions of pipeline corridor projects, and after considering factors such as cost and quality, LFT (Long Fiber Thermoplastic) tempered boards were selected as the face material. These were combined with steel frames of higher structural strength to create a steel frame-LFT glass fiber reinforced tempered surface layer composite formwork. This study includes both experimental testing and numerical simulations of the pipeline corridor system, analyzing the effects of various parameters on performance. The experiment focused on the influence of two variables—support spacing and the number of support points—on the formwork's load-bearing performance, comparing it with traditional steel formwork. The results showed that the failure mode was characterized by unstable bending, with the panel bending and the steel frame bulging, and some specimens showing cracks at mid-span. As the support spacing increased, the ultimate load-bearing capacity and stiffness of the steel frame-LFT glass fiber reinforced surface composite formwork decreased. Fewer support points led to a more significant reduction in both load-bearing capacity and stiffness. Compared to traditional steel formwork, the steel frame-LFT glass fiber reinforced surface composite formwork demonstrated similar load-bearing capacity and stiffness, while being lighter in weight and having a higher turnover rate. The steel frame-LFT glass fiber reinforced surface composite formwork exhibited excellent performance in terms of load-bearing capacity and initial stiffness, meeting the strength requirements for construction formwork. It can replace traditional steel formwork in practical applications, particularly in environments with shorter support distances. Based on the combined results of the experiments and numerical simulations, the optimal support spacing and number of support points were identified. These findings offer valuable insights for the design and application of such formwork systems in future engineering projects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Steel Structures
International Journal of Steel Structures 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
122
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Steel Structures provides an international forum for a broad classification of technical papers in steel structural research and its applications. The journal aims to reach not only researchers, but also practicing engineers. Coverage encompasses such topics as stability, fatigue, non-linear behavior, dynamics, reliability, fire, design codes, computer-aided analysis and design, optimization, expert systems, connections, fabrications, maintenance, bridges, off-shore structures, jetties, stadiums, transmission towers, marine vessels, storage tanks, pressure vessels, aerospace, and pipelines and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信