历史条件是参考条件吗?修正1880年前后进入德国北海和波罗的海的河流养分输入模型

IF 6 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Andreas Gericke, Karoline Morling, Ingo Haag, Micha Gebel, Julia Krumm, Georges Bruns, Justus E. E. van Beusekom, Stephan Fuchs, Wera Leujak
{"title":"历史条件是参考条件吗?修正1880年前后进入德国北海和波罗的海的河流养分输入模型","authors":"Andreas Gericke,&nbsp;Karoline Morling,&nbsp;Ingo Haag,&nbsp;Micha Gebel,&nbsp;Julia Krumm,&nbsp;Georges Bruns,&nbsp;Justus E. E. van Beusekom,&nbsp;Stephan Fuchs,&nbsp;Wera Leujak","doi":"10.1186/s12302-025-01185-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The German legislation sets two targets for riverine nitrogen concentrations in North Sea and Baltic Sea tributaries as well as river type-specific phosphorus thresholds. The current target for the Baltic Sea as well as the thresholds for the good status were derived from modeled riverine and atmospheric inputs around 1880. However, the calculated nitrogen balance differed between the model applications for the German North Sea and Baltic Sea. Existing nitrogen targets for North Sea tributaries are likely insufficient for environmental objectives according to recent model and data analyses. We used a harmonized approach to model nutrient inputs to the German Seas around 1880 and discuss these outcomes in the context of stricter requirements needed for ecological objectives in the North Sea.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>For river basins entering the German North Sea and Baltic Sea, we modeled emissions, concentrations, and loads of total nitrogen and total phosphorus around 1880. The historical riverine inputs to the North Sea were 180 kt N yr<sup>−1</sup> and 4.20 kt P yr<sup>−1</sup> and to the Baltic Sea 22 kt N yr<sup>−1</sup> and 0.45 kt P yr<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. These loads corresponded to annual mean concentrations of 1.36 mg N l<sup>−1</sup> and 0.032 mg P l<sup>−1</sup> (North Sea) as well as 1.11 mg N l<sup>−1</sup> and 0.022 mg P l<sup>−1</sup> (Baltic Sea). Modeled nitrogen concentrations at river mouths were lower than the previous German model results but exceeded published reference concentrations. They were, however, partly in agreement with ecology-based concentrations for major North Sea tributaries based on published reduction needs.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The modeled nutrient concentrations at river mouths confirm the inconsistency of German model applications with regional applications. For the North Sea, they support a more stringent basin-wide nitrogen target and thresholds for the good status of coastal and marine waters. As the historical conditions exceeded reference conditions, the offset of 50% to the historical concentration for the good ecological status should be revised for both sea basins. According to ecology-based target concentrations, only + 30% may be acceptable for North Sea tributaries, corresponding to 1.8 mg N l<sup>−1</sup>. Any revision of the German legislation should acknowledge the inherent uncertainties.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":546,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Sciences Europe","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s12302-025-01185-8.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are historical conditions reference conditions? Revising the modeled riverine nutrient input into the German North Sea and Baltic Sea around 1880\",\"authors\":\"Andreas Gericke,&nbsp;Karoline Morling,&nbsp;Ingo Haag,&nbsp;Micha Gebel,&nbsp;Julia Krumm,&nbsp;Georges Bruns,&nbsp;Justus E. E. van Beusekom,&nbsp;Stephan Fuchs,&nbsp;Wera Leujak\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12302-025-01185-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The German legislation sets two targets for riverine nitrogen concentrations in North Sea and Baltic Sea tributaries as well as river type-specific phosphorus thresholds. The current target for the Baltic Sea as well as the thresholds for the good status were derived from modeled riverine and atmospheric inputs around 1880. However, the calculated nitrogen balance differed between the model applications for the German North Sea and Baltic Sea. Existing nitrogen targets for North Sea tributaries are likely insufficient for environmental objectives according to recent model and data analyses. We used a harmonized approach to model nutrient inputs to the German Seas around 1880 and discuss these outcomes in the context of stricter requirements needed for ecological objectives in the North Sea.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>For river basins entering the German North Sea and Baltic Sea, we modeled emissions, concentrations, and loads of total nitrogen and total phosphorus around 1880. The historical riverine inputs to the North Sea were 180 kt N yr<sup>−1</sup> and 4.20 kt P yr<sup>−1</sup> and to the Baltic Sea 22 kt N yr<sup>−1</sup> and 0.45 kt P yr<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. These loads corresponded to annual mean concentrations of 1.36 mg N l<sup>−1</sup> and 0.032 mg P l<sup>−1</sup> (North Sea) as well as 1.11 mg N l<sup>−1</sup> and 0.022 mg P l<sup>−1</sup> (Baltic Sea). Modeled nitrogen concentrations at river mouths were lower than the previous German model results but exceeded published reference concentrations. They were, however, partly in agreement with ecology-based concentrations for major North Sea tributaries based on published reduction needs.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The modeled nutrient concentrations at river mouths confirm the inconsistency of German model applications with regional applications. For the North Sea, they support a more stringent basin-wide nitrogen target and thresholds for the good status of coastal and marine waters. As the historical conditions exceeded reference conditions, the offset of 50% to the historical concentration for the good ecological status should be revised for both sea basins. According to ecology-based target concentrations, only + 30% may be acceptable for North Sea tributaries, corresponding to 1.8 mg N l<sup>−1</sup>. Any revision of the German legislation should acknowledge the inherent uncertainties.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":546,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Sciences Europe\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s12302-025-01185-8.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Sciences Europe\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12302-025-01185-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Sciences Europe","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12302-025-01185-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

德国立法为北海和波罗的海支流的河流氮浓度以及河流特定类型的磷阈值设定了两个目标。波罗的海目前的目标以及良好状态的阈值是根据1880年左右模拟的河流和大气输入得出的。然而,德国北海和波罗的海的模式应用计算出的氮平衡不同。根据最近的模型和数据分析,北海支流现有的氮目标可能不足以实现环境目标。我们使用了一种统一的方法来模拟1880年左右德国海的营养输入,并在北海生态目标需要更严格要求的背景下讨论这些结果。对于进入德国北海和波罗的海的河流流域,我们模拟了1880年前后总氮和总磷的排放、浓度和负荷。历史上流入北海的河流分别为180 kt N yr - 1和4.20 kt P yr - 1,流入波罗的海的河流分别为22 kt N yr - 1和0.45 kt P yr - 1。这些负荷对应于年平均浓度为1.36 mg N - 1和0.032 mg P - 1(北海)以及1.11 mg N - 1和0.022 mg P - 1(波罗的海)。模拟的河口氮浓度低于先前德国模型的结果,但超过了公布的参考浓度。然而,根据已公布的减排需求,它们与北海主要支流的生态浓度部分一致。结论模拟的河口营养物浓度证实了德国模式应用与区域应用的不一致性。对于北海,他们支持更严格的全盆地氮目标和阈值,以保持沿海和海洋水域的良好状态。由于历史条件超过参考条件,两个海盆生态状况良好时对历史浓度50%的偏移量应进行修正。根据基于生态学的目标浓度,北海支流只有+ 30%可接受,相当于1.8 mg N l−1。对德国立法的任何修订都应承认其固有的不确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Are historical conditions reference conditions? Revising the modeled riverine nutrient input into the German North Sea and Baltic Sea around 1880

Background

The German legislation sets two targets for riverine nitrogen concentrations in North Sea and Baltic Sea tributaries as well as river type-specific phosphorus thresholds. The current target for the Baltic Sea as well as the thresholds for the good status were derived from modeled riverine and atmospheric inputs around 1880. However, the calculated nitrogen balance differed between the model applications for the German North Sea and Baltic Sea. Existing nitrogen targets for North Sea tributaries are likely insufficient for environmental objectives according to recent model and data analyses. We used a harmonized approach to model nutrient inputs to the German Seas around 1880 and discuss these outcomes in the context of stricter requirements needed for ecological objectives in the North Sea.

Results

For river basins entering the German North Sea and Baltic Sea, we modeled emissions, concentrations, and loads of total nitrogen and total phosphorus around 1880. The historical riverine inputs to the North Sea were 180 kt N yr−1 and 4.20 kt P yr−1 and to the Baltic Sea 22 kt N yr−1 and 0.45 kt P yr−1, respectively. These loads corresponded to annual mean concentrations of 1.36 mg N l−1 and 0.032 mg P l−1 (North Sea) as well as 1.11 mg N l−1 and 0.022 mg P l−1 (Baltic Sea). Modeled nitrogen concentrations at river mouths were lower than the previous German model results but exceeded published reference concentrations. They were, however, partly in agreement with ecology-based concentrations for major North Sea tributaries based on published reduction needs.

Conclusions

The modeled nutrient concentrations at river mouths confirm the inconsistency of German model applications with regional applications. For the North Sea, they support a more stringent basin-wide nitrogen target and thresholds for the good status of coastal and marine waters. As the historical conditions exceeded reference conditions, the offset of 50% to the historical concentration for the good ecological status should be revised for both sea basins. According to ecology-based target concentrations, only + 30% may be acceptable for North Sea tributaries, corresponding to 1.8 mg N l−1. Any revision of the German legislation should acknowledge the inherent uncertainties.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Sciences Europe
Environmental Sciences Europe Environmental Science-Pollution
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
1.70%
发文量
110
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: ESEU is an international journal, focusing primarily on Europe, with a broad scope covering all aspects of environmental sciences, including the main topic regulation. ESEU will discuss the entanglement between environmental sciences and regulation because, in recent years, there have been misunderstandings and even disagreement between stakeholders in these two areas. ESEU will help to improve the comprehension of issues between environmental sciences and regulation. ESEU will be an outlet from the German-speaking (DACH) countries to Europe and an inlet from Europe to the DACH countries regarding environmental sciences and regulation. Moreover, ESEU will facilitate the exchange of ideas and interaction between Europe and the DACH countries regarding environmental regulatory issues. Although Europe is at the center of ESEU, the journal will not exclude the rest of the world, because regulatory issues pertaining to environmental sciences can be fully seen only from a global perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信