绘制农林业系统中本土知识的全球科学景观:文献计量学视角(2000-2024)

IF 2.2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Ramasubramanian Sabarivasan, Shanmugam Gokul, Selvam Christinal Infanta
{"title":"绘制农林业系统中本土知识的全球科学景观:文献计量学视角(2000-2024)","authors":"Ramasubramanian Sabarivasan,&nbsp;Shanmugam Gokul,&nbsp;Selvam Christinal Infanta","doi":"10.1007/s10457-025-01337-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Indigenous knowledge systems have long underpinned sustainable agroforestry, yet their academic visibility remains fragmented across disciplines and regions. This study presents a systematic bibliometric analysis of 798 peer-reviewed articles (2000–2024) retrieved from the Scopus database, focusing on traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) within agroforestry and silvopastoral systems. Utilizing the bibliometrix R package, we examined authorship structures, publication outlets, keyword evolution, citation trajectories, and patterns of international collaboration. Findings reveal a pronounced upward trend in scientific production, with an annual growth rate of 7.6% and 45.6% of publications featuring international co-authorship, underscoring the domain’s rising global relevance. <i>Agroforestry Systems</i>, <i>Forests</i>, <i>Trees</i> and <i>Livelihoods</i>, and the <i>Journal of Ethnobiology</i> and <i>Ethnomedicine</i> emerged as the most influential journals. Keyword co-occurrence and thematic mapping reveal a shift in agroforestry research from domestication and land-use practices toward integrated frameworks emphasizing biodiversity conservation, climate resilience, food security, and Indigenous knowledge, underscoring its role as a multifunctional system for sustainability. Citation analysis highlights the multidisciplinary nature of the field, where seminal works draw on ethnobotany and sustainability science to emphasize Indigenous practices as nature-based solutions. Moreover, regional analyses reveal strong contributions from Latin America, Africa, and South Asia, alongside notable research gaps in Central Asia, the Middle East, and the Pacific. This bibliometric synthesis not only charts the intellectual contours of indigenous agroforestry research but also supports the need for epistemologically inclusive and co-produced approaches. Integrating Indigenous knowledge holders within scientific communities is essential to inform policy, enhance agroecosystem design, and advance global sustainability goals.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7610,"journal":{"name":"Agroforestry Systems","volume":"99 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mapping the global scientific landscape of indigenous knowledge in agroforestry systems: a bibliometric perspective (2000–2024)\",\"authors\":\"Ramasubramanian Sabarivasan,&nbsp;Shanmugam Gokul,&nbsp;Selvam Christinal Infanta\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10457-025-01337-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Indigenous knowledge systems have long underpinned sustainable agroforestry, yet their academic visibility remains fragmented across disciplines and regions. This study presents a systematic bibliometric analysis of 798 peer-reviewed articles (2000–2024) retrieved from the Scopus database, focusing on traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) within agroforestry and silvopastoral systems. Utilizing the bibliometrix R package, we examined authorship structures, publication outlets, keyword evolution, citation trajectories, and patterns of international collaboration. Findings reveal a pronounced upward trend in scientific production, with an annual growth rate of 7.6% and 45.6% of publications featuring international co-authorship, underscoring the domain’s rising global relevance. <i>Agroforestry Systems</i>, <i>Forests</i>, <i>Trees</i> and <i>Livelihoods</i>, and the <i>Journal of Ethnobiology</i> and <i>Ethnomedicine</i> emerged as the most influential journals. Keyword co-occurrence and thematic mapping reveal a shift in agroforestry research from domestication and land-use practices toward integrated frameworks emphasizing biodiversity conservation, climate resilience, food security, and Indigenous knowledge, underscoring its role as a multifunctional system for sustainability. Citation analysis highlights the multidisciplinary nature of the field, where seminal works draw on ethnobotany and sustainability science to emphasize Indigenous practices as nature-based solutions. Moreover, regional analyses reveal strong contributions from Latin America, Africa, and South Asia, alongside notable research gaps in Central Asia, the Middle East, and the Pacific. This bibliometric synthesis not only charts the intellectual contours of indigenous agroforestry research but also supports the need for epistemologically inclusive and co-produced approaches. Integrating Indigenous knowledge holders within scientific communities is essential to inform policy, enhance agroecosystem design, and advance global sustainability goals.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agroforestry Systems\",\"volume\":\"99 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agroforestry Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10457-025-01337-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agroforestry Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10457-025-01337-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

土著知识系统长期以来一直是可持续农林业的基础,但其学术知名度在学科和地区之间仍然是分散的。本研究对从Scopus数据库中检索到的798篇同行评议文章(2000-2024)进行了系统的文献计量分析,重点关注农林业和森林系统中的传统生态知识(TEK)。利用bibliometrix R软件包,我们研究了作者结构、出版渠道、关键词演变、引文轨迹和国际合作模式。研究结果显示,科学产出呈显著上升趋势,以国际合作作者为特征的出版物的年增长率为7.6%,45.6%,突显了该领域日益增长的全球相关性。农林业系统、森林、树木和生计以及《民族生物学和民族医学杂志》成为最具影响力的期刊。关键词共生和专题制图揭示了农林业研究从驯化和土地利用实践向强调生物多样性保护、气候适应能力、粮食安全和土著知识的综合框架的转变,强调了其作为可持续性多功能系统的作用。引文分析强调了该领域的多学科性质,其中开创性的作品借鉴了民族植物学和可持续性科学,强调土著实践是基于自然的解决方案。此外,区域分析显示拉丁美洲、非洲和南亚的贡献很大,中亚、中东和太平洋地区的研究存在显著差距。这种文献计量综合不仅绘制了土著农林业研究的知识轮廓,而且还支持对认识论包容性和共同生产方法的需求。将土著知识持有者纳入科学界对于为政策提供信息、加强农业生态系统设计和推进全球可持续性目标至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mapping the global scientific landscape of indigenous knowledge in agroforestry systems: a bibliometric perspective (2000–2024)

Indigenous knowledge systems have long underpinned sustainable agroforestry, yet their academic visibility remains fragmented across disciplines and regions. This study presents a systematic bibliometric analysis of 798 peer-reviewed articles (2000–2024) retrieved from the Scopus database, focusing on traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) within agroforestry and silvopastoral systems. Utilizing the bibliometrix R package, we examined authorship structures, publication outlets, keyword evolution, citation trajectories, and patterns of international collaboration. Findings reveal a pronounced upward trend in scientific production, with an annual growth rate of 7.6% and 45.6% of publications featuring international co-authorship, underscoring the domain’s rising global relevance. Agroforestry Systems, Forests, Trees and Livelihoods, and the Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine emerged as the most influential journals. Keyword co-occurrence and thematic mapping reveal a shift in agroforestry research from domestication and land-use practices toward integrated frameworks emphasizing biodiversity conservation, climate resilience, food security, and Indigenous knowledge, underscoring its role as a multifunctional system for sustainability. Citation analysis highlights the multidisciplinary nature of the field, where seminal works draw on ethnobotany and sustainability science to emphasize Indigenous practices as nature-based solutions. Moreover, regional analyses reveal strong contributions from Latin America, Africa, and South Asia, alongside notable research gaps in Central Asia, the Middle East, and the Pacific. This bibliometric synthesis not only charts the intellectual contours of indigenous agroforestry research but also supports the need for epistemologically inclusive and co-produced approaches. Integrating Indigenous knowledge holders within scientific communities is essential to inform policy, enhance agroecosystem design, and advance global sustainability goals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Agroforestry Systems
Agroforestry Systems 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
78
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Agroforestry Systems is an international scientific journal that publishes results of novel, high impact original research, critical reviews and short communications on any aspect of agroforestry. The journal particularly encourages contributions that demonstrate the role of agroforestry in providing commodity as well non-commodity benefits such as ecosystem services. Papers dealing with both biophysical and socioeconomic aspects are welcome. These include results of investigations of a fundamental or applied nature dealing with integrated systems involving trees and crops and/or livestock. Manuscripts that are purely descriptive in nature or confirmatory in nature of well-established findings, and with limited international scope are discouraged. To be acceptable for publication, the information presented must be relevant to a context wider than the specific location where the study was undertaken, and provide new insight or make a significant contribution to the agroforestry knowledge base
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信