加速癌症治疗的演变-监管灵活性如何推动美国癌症生物制剂的加速批准(1993-2023)

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Fathima Musthafa, Simran Simran, Vishal Sachin Gangawane, Vaishnavi Milind Kalokhe, Aftab Ahmad, Saurabh Srivastava
{"title":"加速癌症治疗的演变-监管灵活性如何推动美国癌症生物制剂的加速批准(1993-2023)","authors":"Fathima Musthafa,&nbsp;Simran Simran,&nbsp;Vishal Sachin Gangawane,&nbsp;Vaishnavi Milind Kalokhe,&nbsp;Aftab Ahmad,&nbsp;Saurabh Srivastava","doi":"10.1007/s12247-025-10059-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The United States Food and Drug Administration’s (USFDA) accelerated approval process enables the rapid introduction of biologics based on surrogate endpoints for unmet medical needs, particularly in cancer treatment. Biologics play a vital role in precision medicine by enhancing the immune system’s ability to fight cancer or targeting malignancies directly. Since its inception in 1992, the program has significantly increased the approval of cancer biologics.</p><h3>Method</h3><p>This study analysed the regulatory status of accelerated biologics approved for cancer over 30 years, based on the USFDA “Drug and Biologic Accelerated Approvals Based on a Surrogate Endpoint” report (as of September 30, 2024). The time to full approval, withdrawal trends, and the submission of Biologics License Application (BLA) and supplements were evaluated.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Out of the 106 Biologics License Applications (BLAs), 97 (91.50%) were for cancer and 9 (8.49%) for non-oncology indications. Among 37 original BLAs, 22 (59.45%) achieved full approval, 11 (29.72%) were not converted, and 4 (10.81%) were withdrawn. For 60 supplements, 38 (63.33%) gained full approval, 14 (23.33%) were not converted, and 8 (13.33%) were withdrawn. Accelerated approval of BLAs for cancer took an average of 4.44 years to reach full approval, while supplements required 3.10 years. Withdrawals averaged 3.64 years for BLAs and 4.14 years for supplements.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The study highlights the dominance of BLA supplements over original BLAs, their faster conversion to full approval, and greater time for withdrawal. These findings underscore the significance of supplement applications in enhancing the regulatory and clinical value of previously approved biologics.</p><h3>Graphical Abstract</h3><div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":656,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation","volume":"20 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Evolution of Turbocharged Cancer Therapeutics - How Regulatory Flexibility has Driven Accelerated Cancer Biologics Approvals in the United States (1993–2023)\",\"authors\":\"Fathima Musthafa,&nbsp;Simran Simran,&nbsp;Vishal Sachin Gangawane,&nbsp;Vaishnavi Milind Kalokhe,&nbsp;Aftab Ahmad,&nbsp;Saurabh Srivastava\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12247-025-10059-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The United States Food and Drug Administration’s (USFDA) accelerated approval process enables the rapid introduction of biologics based on surrogate endpoints for unmet medical needs, particularly in cancer treatment. Biologics play a vital role in precision medicine by enhancing the immune system’s ability to fight cancer or targeting malignancies directly. Since its inception in 1992, the program has significantly increased the approval of cancer biologics.</p><h3>Method</h3><p>This study analysed the regulatory status of accelerated biologics approved for cancer over 30 years, based on the USFDA “Drug and Biologic Accelerated Approvals Based on a Surrogate Endpoint” report (as of September 30, 2024). The time to full approval, withdrawal trends, and the submission of Biologics License Application (BLA) and supplements were evaluated.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Out of the 106 Biologics License Applications (BLAs), 97 (91.50%) were for cancer and 9 (8.49%) for non-oncology indications. Among 37 original BLAs, 22 (59.45%) achieved full approval, 11 (29.72%) were not converted, and 4 (10.81%) were withdrawn. For 60 supplements, 38 (63.33%) gained full approval, 14 (23.33%) were not converted, and 8 (13.33%) were withdrawn. Accelerated approval of BLAs for cancer took an average of 4.44 years to reach full approval, while supplements required 3.10 years. Withdrawals averaged 3.64 years for BLAs and 4.14 years for supplements.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The study highlights the dominance of BLA supplements over original BLAs, their faster conversion to full approval, and greater time for withdrawal. These findings underscore the significance of supplement applications in enhancing the regulatory and clinical value of previously approved biologics.</p><h3>Graphical Abstract</h3><div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation\",\"volume\":\"20 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12247-025-10059-8\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12247-025-10059-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:美国食品和药物管理局(USFDA)的加速审批程序使基于替代终点的生物制剂能够快速引入,以满足未满足的医疗需求,特别是在癌症治疗中。生物制剂通过增强免疫系统对抗癌症或直接靶向恶性肿瘤的能力,在精准医疗中发挥着至关重要的作用。自1992年启动以来,该计划显著增加了癌症生物制剂的批准。方法本研究基于USFDA“基于替代终点的药物和生物制剂加速批准”报告(截至2024年9月30日),分析了30年来批准用于癌症的加速生物制剂的监管状况。评估了完全批准的时间、撤销趋势以及提交生物制剂许可申请(BLA)和补充材料。结果在106份生物制剂许可申请(bla)中,97份(91.50%)用于癌症,9份(8.49%)用于非肿瘤适应症。37份原bla中,22份(59.45%)获得完全批准,11份(29.72%)未转化,4份(10.81%)被撤销。60个补充品中,38个(63.33%)获得完全批准,14个(23.33%)未转化,8个(13.33%)被撤销。加速批准用于癌症的bla平均需要4.44年才能获得完全批准,而补充剂则需要3.10年。bla的平均停药时间为3.64年,补充剂的平均停药时间为4.14年。结论:该研究强调了BLA补充剂相对于原BLA的优势,它们更快地转化为完全批准,并且更长的停药时间。这些发现强调了补充剂应用在提高先前批准的生物制剂的监管和临床价值方面的重要性。图形抽象
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Evolution of Turbocharged Cancer Therapeutics - How Regulatory Flexibility has Driven Accelerated Cancer Biologics Approvals in the United States (1993–2023)

Background

The United States Food and Drug Administration’s (USFDA) accelerated approval process enables the rapid introduction of biologics based on surrogate endpoints for unmet medical needs, particularly in cancer treatment. Biologics play a vital role in precision medicine by enhancing the immune system’s ability to fight cancer or targeting malignancies directly. Since its inception in 1992, the program has significantly increased the approval of cancer biologics.

Method

This study analysed the regulatory status of accelerated biologics approved for cancer over 30 years, based on the USFDA “Drug and Biologic Accelerated Approvals Based on a Surrogate Endpoint” report (as of September 30, 2024). The time to full approval, withdrawal trends, and the submission of Biologics License Application (BLA) and supplements were evaluated.

Results

Out of the 106 Biologics License Applications (BLAs), 97 (91.50%) were for cancer and 9 (8.49%) for non-oncology indications. Among 37 original BLAs, 22 (59.45%) achieved full approval, 11 (29.72%) were not converted, and 4 (10.81%) were withdrawn. For 60 supplements, 38 (63.33%) gained full approval, 14 (23.33%) were not converted, and 8 (13.33%) were withdrawn. Accelerated approval of BLAs for cancer took an average of 4.44 years to reach full approval, while supplements required 3.10 years. Withdrawals averaged 3.64 years for BLAs and 4.14 years for supplements.

Conclusion

The study highlights the dominance of BLA supplements over original BLAs, their faster conversion to full approval, and greater time for withdrawal. These findings underscore the significance of supplement applications in enhancing the regulatory and clinical value of previously approved biologics.

Graphical Abstract

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation
Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
3.80%
发文量
90
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation (JPI), is an international, multidisciplinary peer-reviewed scientific journal dedicated to publishing high quality papers emphasizing innovative research and applied technologies within the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries. JPI''s goal is to be the premier communication vehicle for the critical body of knowledge that is needed for scientific evolution and technical innovation, from R&D to market. Topics will fall under the following categories: Materials science, Product design, Process design, optimization, automation and control, Facilities; Information management, Regulatory policy and strategy, Supply chain developments , Education and professional development, Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation publishes four issues a year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信