{"title":"加速癌症治疗的演变-监管灵活性如何推动美国癌症生物制剂的加速批准(1993-2023)","authors":"Fathima Musthafa, Simran Simran, Vishal Sachin Gangawane, Vaishnavi Milind Kalokhe, Aftab Ahmad, Saurabh Srivastava","doi":"10.1007/s12247-025-10059-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The United States Food and Drug Administration’s (USFDA) accelerated approval process enables the rapid introduction of biologics based on surrogate endpoints for unmet medical needs, particularly in cancer treatment. Biologics play a vital role in precision medicine by enhancing the immune system’s ability to fight cancer or targeting malignancies directly. Since its inception in 1992, the program has significantly increased the approval of cancer biologics.</p><h3>Method</h3><p>This study analysed the regulatory status of accelerated biologics approved for cancer over 30 years, based on the USFDA “Drug and Biologic Accelerated Approvals Based on a Surrogate Endpoint” report (as of September 30, 2024). The time to full approval, withdrawal trends, and the submission of Biologics License Application (BLA) and supplements were evaluated.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Out of the 106 Biologics License Applications (BLAs), 97 (91.50%) were for cancer and 9 (8.49%) for non-oncology indications. Among 37 original BLAs, 22 (59.45%) achieved full approval, 11 (29.72%) were not converted, and 4 (10.81%) were withdrawn. For 60 supplements, 38 (63.33%) gained full approval, 14 (23.33%) were not converted, and 8 (13.33%) were withdrawn. Accelerated approval of BLAs for cancer took an average of 4.44 years to reach full approval, while supplements required 3.10 years. Withdrawals averaged 3.64 years for BLAs and 4.14 years for supplements.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The study highlights the dominance of BLA supplements over original BLAs, their faster conversion to full approval, and greater time for withdrawal. These findings underscore the significance of supplement applications in enhancing the regulatory and clinical value of previously approved biologics.</p><h3>Graphical Abstract</h3><div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":656,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation","volume":"20 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Evolution of Turbocharged Cancer Therapeutics - How Regulatory Flexibility has Driven Accelerated Cancer Biologics Approvals in the United States (1993–2023)\",\"authors\":\"Fathima Musthafa, Simran Simran, Vishal Sachin Gangawane, Vaishnavi Milind Kalokhe, Aftab Ahmad, Saurabh Srivastava\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12247-025-10059-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The United States Food and Drug Administration’s (USFDA) accelerated approval process enables the rapid introduction of biologics based on surrogate endpoints for unmet medical needs, particularly in cancer treatment. Biologics play a vital role in precision medicine by enhancing the immune system’s ability to fight cancer or targeting malignancies directly. Since its inception in 1992, the program has significantly increased the approval of cancer biologics.</p><h3>Method</h3><p>This study analysed the regulatory status of accelerated biologics approved for cancer over 30 years, based on the USFDA “Drug and Biologic Accelerated Approvals Based on a Surrogate Endpoint” report (as of September 30, 2024). The time to full approval, withdrawal trends, and the submission of Biologics License Application (BLA) and supplements were evaluated.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Out of the 106 Biologics License Applications (BLAs), 97 (91.50%) were for cancer and 9 (8.49%) for non-oncology indications. Among 37 original BLAs, 22 (59.45%) achieved full approval, 11 (29.72%) were not converted, and 4 (10.81%) were withdrawn. For 60 supplements, 38 (63.33%) gained full approval, 14 (23.33%) were not converted, and 8 (13.33%) were withdrawn. Accelerated approval of BLAs for cancer took an average of 4.44 years to reach full approval, while supplements required 3.10 years. Withdrawals averaged 3.64 years for BLAs and 4.14 years for supplements.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The study highlights the dominance of BLA supplements over original BLAs, their faster conversion to full approval, and greater time for withdrawal. These findings underscore the significance of supplement applications in enhancing the regulatory and clinical value of previously approved biologics.</p><h3>Graphical Abstract</h3><div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation\",\"volume\":\"20 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12247-025-10059-8\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12247-025-10059-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Evolution of Turbocharged Cancer Therapeutics - How Regulatory Flexibility has Driven Accelerated Cancer Biologics Approvals in the United States (1993–2023)
Background
The United States Food and Drug Administration’s (USFDA) accelerated approval process enables the rapid introduction of biologics based on surrogate endpoints for unmet medical needs, particularly in cancer treatment. Biologics play a vital role in precision medicine by enhancing the immune system’s ability to fight cancer or targeting malignancies directly. Since its inception in 1992, the program has significantly increased the approval of cancer biologics.
Method
This study analysed the regulatory status of accelerated biologics approved for cancer over 30 years, based on the USFDA “Drug and Biologic Accelerated Approvals Based on a Surrogate Endpoint” report (as of September 30, 2024). The time to full approval, withdrawal trends, and the submission of Biologics License Application (BLA) and supplements were evaluated.
Results
Out of the 106 Biologics License Applications (BLAs), 97 (91.50%) were for cancer and 9 (8.49%) for non-oncology indications. Among 37 original BLAs, 22 (59.45%) achieved full approval, 11 (29.72%) were not converted, and 4 (10.81%) were withdrawn. For 60 supplements, 38 (63.33%) gained full approval, 14 (23.33%) were not converted, and 8 (13.33%) were withdrawn. Accelerated approval of BLAs for cancer took an average of 4.44 years to reach full approval, while supplements required 3.10 years. Withdrawals averaged 3.64 years for BLAs and 4.14 years for supplements.
Conclusion
The study highlights the dominance of BLA supplements over original BLAs, their faster conversion to full approval, and greater time for withdrawal. These findings underscore the significance of supplement applications in enhancing the regulatory and clinical value of previously approved biologics.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation (JPI), is an international, multidisciplinary peer-reviewed scientific journal dedicated to publishing high quality papers emphasizing innovative research and applied technologies within the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries. JPI''s goal is to be the premier communication vehicle for the critical body of knowledge that is needed for scientific evolution and technical innovation, from R&D to market. Topics will fall under the following categories:
Materials science,
Product design,
Process design, optimization, automation and control,
Facilities; Information management,
Regulatory policy and strategy,
Supply chain developments ,
Education and professional development,
Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation publishes four issues a year.