生物基与合成环氧树脂基复合瓦的生命周期评价:基于农业与工业废弃物填充物的对比分析

IF 3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Firoz Alam Faroque, Piyumali Mewanthika Jayasundara, Mahinsasa Rathnayake, Subrata Bandhu Ghosh, Sanchita Bandyopadhyay-Ghosh
{"title":"生物基与合成环氧树脂基复合瓦的生命周期评价:基于农业与工业废弃物填充物的对比分析","authors":"Firoz Alam Faroque,&nbsp;Piyumali Mewanthika Jayasundara,&nbsp;Mahinsasa Rathnayake,&nbsp;Subrata Bandhu Ghosh,&nbsp;Sanchita Bandyopadhyay-Ghosh","doi":"10.1007/s10163-025-02260-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The use of biopolymeric resin-based composites as sustainable alternatives to synthetic resin-based composites is gaining traction. This study evaluates the life cycle environmental impacts of four composite tile formulations combining two waste fillers (wheat straw and marble dust) with two resins (synthetic epoxy and bio-epoxy). This study performs a comparative LCA by assuming wheat straw and marble dust as locally generated waste materials while synthetic epoxy and bio-epoxy are generated from fossil sources and bio-based sources, respectively. A life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology was adopted to identify more environmentally sustainable options. The global warming impact was highest for wheat straw synthetic epoxy composites (73.9 kg CO₂ eq./m2 of tiles) and lowest for marble dust bio-epoxy composites (52.6 kg CO₂ eq./m2). Wheat straw bio-epoxy composites showed minimal impacts for fine particulate matter formation (0.00778 kg PM₂.₅ eq./m2) and terrestrial acidification (0.248 kg SO₂ eq./m2). Marble dust synthetic epoxy composites had the lowest freshwater eutrophication impact (0.028 kg P eq./m2). Overall, marble dust and bio-epoxy composites were the most sustainable option. Sensitivity analysis, accounting for ± 20% variation in key parameters, highlighted that environmental impacts are most sensitive to process energy consumption, emphasizing the need for energy-efficient technologies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":643,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management","volume":"27 4","pages":"2482 - 2498"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Life cycle assessment of bio-based and synthetic epoxy resin mediated composite tiles: a comparative analysis based on agricultural and industrial waste filler\",\"authors\":\"Firoz Alam Faroque,&nbsp;Piyumali Mewanthika Jayasundara,&nbsp;Mahinsasa Rathnayake,&nbsp;Subrata Bandhu Ghosh,&nbsp;Sanchita Bandyopadhyay-Ghosh\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10163-025-02260-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The use of biopolymeric resin-based composites as sustainable alternatives to synthetic resin-based composites is gaining traction. This study evaluates the life cycle environmental impacts of four composite tile formulations combining two waste fillers (wheat straw and marble dust) with two resins (synthetic epoxy and bio-epoxy). This study performs a comparative LCA by assuming wheat straw and marble dust as locally generated waste materials while synthetic epoxy and bio-epoxy are generated from fossil sources and bio-based sources, respectively. A life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology was adopted to identify more environmentally sustainable options. The global warming impact was highest for wheat straw synthetic epoxy composites (73.9 kg CO₂ eq./m2 of tiles) and lowest for marble dust bio-epoxy composites (52.6 kg CO₂ eq./m2). Wheat straw bio-epoxy composites showed minimal impacts for fine particulate matter formation (0.00778 kg PM₂.₅ eq./m2) and terrestrial acidification (0.248 kg SO₂ eq./m2). Marble dust synthetic epoxy composites had the lowest freshwater eutrophication impact (0.028 kg P eq./m2). Overall, marble dust and bio-epoxy composites were the most sustainable option. Sensitivity analysis, accounting for ± 20% variation in key parameters, highlighted that environmental impacts are most sensitive to process energy consumption, emphasizing the need for energy-efficient technologies.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":643,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management\",\"volume\":\"27 4\",\"pages\":\"2482 - 2498\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10163-025-02260-1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10163-025-02260-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生物聚合物树脂基复合材料作为合成树脂基复合材料的可持续替代品的使用越来越受到关注。本研究评估了由两种垃圾填充物(麦秸和大理石粉尘)和两种树脂(合成环氧树脂和生物环氧树脂)组成的四种复合瓦配方的生命周期环境影响。本研究假设麦秸和大理石粉尘为当地产生的废弃物,合成环氧树脂和生物环氧树脂分别来自化石来源和生物基来源,进行了比较的LCA。采用了一种生命周期评价方法来确定环境上更可持续的选择。对全球变暖影响最大的是麦草合成环氧复合材料(73.9 kg CO₂equq /m2),最低的是大理石粉尘生物环氧复合材料(52.6 kg CO₂equq /m2)。麦秆生物环氧复合材料对细颗粒物形成的影响最小(0.00778 kg PM 2)。₅当量/m2)和陆地酸化(0.248 kg SO₂当量/m2)。大理石粉尘合成环氧复合材料对淡水富营养化的影响最小(0.028 kg P当量/m2)。总体而言,大理石粉尘和生物环氧复合材料是最可持续的选择。敏感性分析(占关键参数变化的±20%)强调了环境影响对过程能耗最敏感,强调了对节能技术的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Life cycle assessment of bio-based and synthetic epoxy resin mediated composite tiles: a comparative analysis based on agricultural and industrial waste filler

The use of biopolymeric resin-based composites as sustainable alternatives to synthetic resin-based composites is gaining traction. This study evaluates the life cycle environmental impacts of four composite tile formulations combining two waste fillers (wheat straw and marble dust) with two resins (synthetic epoxy and bio-epoxy). This study performs a comparative LCA by assuming wheat straw and marble dust as locally generated waste materials while synthetic epoxy and bio-epoxy are generated from fossil sources and bio-based sources, respectively. A life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology was adopted to identify more environmentally sustainable options. The global warming impact was highest for wheat straw synthetic epoxy composites (73.9 kg CO₂ eq./m2 of tiles) and lowest for marble dust bio-epoxy composites (52.6 kg CO₂ eq./m2). Wheat straw bio-epoxy composites showed minimal impacts for fine particulate matter formation (0.00778 kg PM₂.₅ eq./m2) and terrestrial acidification (0.248 kg SO₂ eq./m2). Marble dust synthetic epoxy composites had the lowest freshwater eutrophication impact (0.028 kg P eq./m2). Overall, marble dust and bio-epoxy composites were the most sustainable option. Sensitivity analysis, accounting for ± 20% variation in key parameters, highlighted that environmental impacts are most sensitive to process energy consumption, emphasizing the need for energy-efficient technologies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
16.10%
发文量
205
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management has a twofold focus: research in technical, political, and environmental problems of material cycles and waste management; and information that contributes to the development of an interdisciplinary science of material cycles and waste management. Its aim is to develop solutions and prescriptions for material cycles. The journal publishes original articles, reviews, and invited papers from a wide range of disciplines related to material cycles and waste management. The journal is published in cooperation with the Japan Society of Material Cycles and Waste Management (JSMCWM) and the Korea Society of Waste Management (KSWM).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信