改进正弦余弦算法综述:改进元启发式算法的常用方法

IF 12.1 2区 工程技术 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Qusay Shihab Hamad, Sami Abdulla Mohsen Saleh, Shahrel Azmin Suandi, Hussein Samma, Yasameen Shihab Hamad, Abdelazim G. Hussien
{"title":"改进正弦余弦算法综述:改进元启发式算法的常用方法","authors":"Qusay Shihab Hamad,&nbsp;Sami Abdulla Mohsen Saleh,&nbsp;Shahrel Azmin Suandi,&nbsp;Hussein Samma,&nbsp;Yasameen Shihab Hamad,&nbsp;Abdelazim G. Hussien","doi":"10.1007/s11831-024-10218-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In recent years, the quest for optimizing metaheuristic algorithms has led to a surge in research efforts aimed at enhancing their performance. While existing reviews have diligently summarized these endeavors, they primarily focus on presenting the collective body of work undertaken to augment standard algorithms. In contrast, this paper takes a unique perspective by concentrating on the myriad methodologies employed by authors to improve one such algorithm, the Sine Cosine Algorithm (SCA). Our comprehensive review dissects the various strategies used to elevate the effectiveness of SCA variants, meticulously scrutinizing their advantages and disadvantages. This in-depth analysis extends beyond the confines of SCA and provides valuable insights into the broader landscape of metaheuristic optimization algorithms. By evaluating the pros and cons of these enhancement methods, our work forms a foundational review that can be applied to other optimization algorithms. Through this broader lens, we offer readers a comprehensive overview of the strategies adopted by researchers in recent years to enhance optimization algorithms, facilitating a deeper understanding of the advancement of this vital field. Our paper thus serves as a guidepost for researchers and practitioners navigating the ever-evolving terrain of metaheuristic optimization, shedding light on the strengths and potential pitfalls of enhancement methodologies. It provides a holistic perspective that empowers the community to make informed choices when selecting or devising strategies to optimize algorithms for diverse problem domains. </p></div>","PeriodicalId":55473,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering","volume":"32 4","pages":"2549 - 2606"},"PeriodicalIF":12.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Review of Enhancing Sine Cosine Algorithm: Common Approaches for Improved Metaheuristic Algorithms\",\"authors\":\"Qusay Shihab Hamad,&nbsp;Sami Abdulla Mohsen Saleh,&nbsp;Shahrel Azmin Suandi,&nbsp;Hussein Samma,&nbsp;Yasameen Shihab Hamad,&nbsp;Abdelazim G. Hussien\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11831-024-10218-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In recent years, the quest for optimizing metaheuristic algorithms has led to a surge in research efforts aimed at enhancing their performance. While existing reviews have diligently summarized these endeavors, they primarily focus on presenting the collective body of work undertaken to augment standard algorithms. In contrast, this paper takes a unique perspective by concentrating on the myriad methodologies employed by authors to improve one such algorithm, the Sine Cosine Algorithm (SCA). Our comprehensive review dissects the various strategies used to elevate the effectiveness of SCA variants, meticulously scrutinizing their advantages and disadvantages. This in-depth analysis extends beyond the confines of SCA and provides valuable insights into the broader landscape of metaheuristic optimization algorithms. By evaluating the pros and cons of these enhancement methods, our work forms a foundational review that can be applied to other optimization algorithms. Through this broader lens, we offer readers a comprehensive overview of the strategies adopted by researchers in recent years to enhance optimization algorithms, facilitating a deeper understanding of the advancement of this vital field. Our paper thus serves as a guidepost for researchers and practitioners navigating the ever-evolving terrain of metaheuristic optimization, shedding light on the strengths and potential pitfalls of enhancement methodologies. It provides a holistic perspective that empowers the community to make informed choices when selecting or devising strategies to optimize algorithms for diverse problem domains. </p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55473,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering\",\"volume\":\"32 4\",\"pages\":\"2549 - 2606\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11831-024-10218-z\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11831-024-10218-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,对优化元启发式算法的探索导致了旨在提高其性能的研究努力的激增。虽然现有的评论已经勤奋地总结了这些努力,但它们主要集中在展示为增强标准算法而进行的集体工作。相比之下,本文采用了独特的视角,专注于作者所采用的无数方法来改进这样一种算法,即正弦余弦算法(SCA)。我们的综合综述剖析了用于提高SCA变体有效性的各种策略,仔细分析了它们的优点和缺点。这种深入的分析超出了SCA的范围,并对元启发式优化算法的更广泛领域提供了有价值的见解。通过评估这些增强方法的优点和缺点,我们的工作形成了可以应用于其他优化算法的基础审查。通过这个更广泛的镜头,我们为读者提供了近年来研究人员采用的策略的全面概述,以增强优化算法,促进对这一重要领域的进步有更深的理解。因此,我们的论文为研究人员和实践者导航不断发展的元启发式优化领域提供了指导,揭示了增强方法的优势和潜在缺陷。它提供了一个整体的视角,使社区能够在选择或设计策略以优化不同问题领域的算法时做出明智的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A Review of Enhancing Sine Cosine Algorithm: Common Approaches for Improved Metaheuristic Algorithms

A Review of Enhancing Sine Cosine Algorithm: Common Approaches for Improved Metaheuristic Algorithms

In recent years, the quest for optimizing metaheuristic algorithms has led to a surge in research efforts aimed at enhancing their performance. While existing reviews have diligently summarized these endeavors, they primarily focus on presenting the collective body of work undertaken to augment standard algorithms. In contrast, this paper takes a unique perspective by concentrating on the myriad methodologies employed by authors to improve one such algorithm, the Sine Cosine Algorithm (SCA). Our comprehensive review dissects the various strategies used to elevate the effectiveness of SCA variants, meticulously scrutinizing their advantages and disadvantages. This in-depth analysis extends beyond the confines of SCA and provides valuable insights into the broader landscape of metaheuristic optimization algorithms. By evaluating the pros and cons of these enhancement methods, our work forms a foundational review that can be applied to other optimization algorithms. Through this broader lens, we offer readers a comprehensive overview of the strategies adopted by researchers in recent years to enhance optimization algorithms, facilitating a deeper understanding of the advancement of this vital field. Our paper thus serves as a guidepost for researchers and practitioners navigating the ever-evolving terrain of metaheuristic optimization, shedding light on the strengths and potential pitfalls of enhancement methodologies. It provides a holistic perspective that empowers the community to make informed choices when selecting or devising strategies to optimize algorithms for diverse problem domains.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.80
自引率
4.10%
发文量
153
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering Aim and Scope: Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering serves as an active forum for disseminating research and advanced practices in computational engineering, particularly focusing on mechanics and related fields. The journal emphasizes extended state-of-the-art reviews in selected areas, a unique feature of its publication. Review Format: Reviews published in the journal offer: A survey of current literature Critical exposition of topics in their full complexity By organizing the information in this manner, readers can quickly grasp the focus, coverage, and unique features of the Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信