网络实时运动学(NRTK)方法在不同时空尺度土壤侵蚀测量中的适用性

IF 2.3 Q2 REMOTE SENSING
Katarina Glavačević, Ivan Marić, Fran Domazetović, Ante Šiljeg, Gloria Pedić, Luka Jurjević, Lovre Panđa
{"title":"网络实时运动学(NRTK)方法在不同时空尺度土壤侵蚀测量中的适用性","authors":"Katarina Glavačević,&nbsp;Ivan Marić,&nbsp;Fran Domazetović,&nbsp;Ante Šiljeg,&nbsp;Gloria Pedić,&nbsp;Luka Jurjević,&nbsp;Lovre Panđa","doi":"10.1007/s12518-025-00612-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Geomorphic change detection (GCD), geotechnical engineering, and hazard mapping are analyses that require the lowest possible absolute total error in digital elevation models (DEMs). One of the most common GCD analyses is the quantification of soil erosion. NRTK (Network Real-Time Kinematic) is one of the three primary modes within the broader method of direct georeferencing (DG). NRTK uses a network of multiple GNSS reference stations to provide real-time correction data to a UAV, enabling centimeter-level positioning accuracy. This approach eliminates the need for ground control points (GCPs), reducing both costs and survey time. However, its application in multi-temporal soil erosion analysis remains insufficiently researched. In this paper the NRTK approach in GCD analysis is evaluated using Matrice 210 RTK V2 at two case studies. In addition, the absolute accuracy of the NRTK was tested on three other sites. Although achieved results can be regarded as promising, especially at lower altitudes, this research highlights drawbacks when employing the NRTK in analysing soil erosion measurement. Namely, the use of the DG-based models in GCD analysis generated unreliable results when compared with the reference model derived using the SfM photogrammetry with GCP. In both study sites, the NRTK approach significantly overestimated the amount of accumulated sediment, affected the total net sediment difference, and eliminated a substantial amount of change. Although the NRTK approach shows limitations in reliably quantifying volumetric changes in soil erosion measurements, results indicate that NRTK can be applied for analyzing linear gully headcut retreat rates. For applications where achieving the lowest absolute total error is not a priority, NRTK can be a relatively reliable solution. However, researchers should exercise caution when using it to analyze soil erosion over different time scales, particularly if the rate of morphological change is low.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46286,"journal":{"name":"Applied Geomatics","volume":"17 2","pages":"295 - 321"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Applicability of network real time kinematic (NRTK) approach in soil erosion measurement at different temporal and spatial scales\",\"authors\":\"Katarina Glavačević,&nbsp;Ivan Marić,&nbsp;Fran Domazetović,&nbsp;Ante Šiljeg,&nbsp;Gloria Pedić,&nbsp;Luka Jurjević,&nbsp;Lovre Panđa\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12518-025-00612-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Geomorphic change detection (GCD), geotechnical engineering, and hazard mapping are analyses that require the lowest possible absolute total error in digital elevation models (DEMs). One of the most common GCD analyses is the quantification of soil erosion. NRTK (Network Real-Time Kinematic) is one of the three primary modes within the broader method of direct georeferencing (DG). NRTK uses a network of multiple GNSS reference stations to provide real-time correction data to a UAV, enabling centimeter-level positioning accuracy. This approach eliminates the need for ground control points (GCPs), reducing both costs and survey time. However, its application in multi-temporal soil erosion analysis remains insufficiently researched. In this paper the NRTK approach in GCD analysis is evaluated using Matrice 210 RTK V2 at two case studies. In addition, the absolute accuracy of the NRTK was tested on three other sites. Although achieved results can be regarded as promising, especially at lower altitudes, this research highlights drawbacks when employing the NRTK in analysing soil erosion measurement. Namely, the use of the DG-based models in GCD analysis generated unreliable results when compared with the reference model derived using the SfM photogrammetry with GCP. In both study sites, the NRTK approach significantly overestimated the amount of accumulated sediment, affected the total net sediment difference, and eliminated a substantial amount of change. Although the NRTK approach shows limitations in reliably quantifying volumetric changes in soil erosion measurements, results indicate that NRTK can be applied for analyzing linear gully headcut retreat rates. For applications where achieving the lowest absolute total error is not a priority, NRTK can be a relatively reliable solution. However, researchers should exercise caution when using it to analyze soil erosion over different time scales, particularly if the rate of morphological change is low.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46286,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Geomatics\",\"volume\":\"17 2\",\"pages\":\"295 - 321\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Geomatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12518-025-00612-y\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REMOTE SENSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Geomatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12518-025-00612-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REMOTE SENSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

地貌变化检测(GCD)、岩土工程和灾害测绘是需要在数字高程模型(dem)中尽可能降低绝对总误差的分析。最常见的GCD分析之一是土壤侵蚀的量化。NRTK(网络实时运动学)是直接地理参考(DG)方法中的三种主要模式之一。NRTK使用多个GNSS参考站网络向无人机提供实时校正数据,实现厘米级定位精度。这种方法消除了对地面控制点(gcp)的需求,降低了成本和测量时间。然而,该方法在多时相土壤侵蚀分析中的应用研究尚不充分。本文在两个案例研究中使用Matrice 210 RTK V2对GCD分析中的NRTK方法进行了评估。此外,在另外三个地点测试了NRTK的绝对准确性。虽然取得的结果可以被认为是有希望的,特别是在低海拔地区,但本研究强调了在使用NRTK分析土壤侵蚀测量时的缺点。也就是说,在GCD分析中使用基于dg的模型与使用GCP的SfM摄影测量导出的参考模型相比,产生了不可靠的结果。在两个研究点,NRTK方法显著高估了累积泥沙量,影响了总净泥沙差异,并消除了大量变化。尽管NRTK方法在可靠地量化土壤侵蚀测量的体积变化方面存在局限性,但结果表明NRTK可以应用于分析线性沟壑头切退缩率。对于实现最低的绝对总误差并不是优先考虑的应用程序,NRTK可能是一个相对可靠的解决方案。然而,研究人员在使用它来分析不同时间尺度的土壤侵蚀时应该谨慎,特别是在形态变化速率较低的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Applicability of network real time kinematic (NRTK) approach in soil erosion measurement at different temporal and spatial scales

Geomorphic change detection (GCD), geotechnical engineering, and hazard mapping are analyses that require the lowest possible absolute total error in digital elevation models (DEMs). One of the most common GCD analyses is the quantification of soil erosion. NRTK (Network Real-Time Kinematic) is one of the three primary modes within the broader method of direct georeferencing (DG). NRTK uses a network of multiple GNSS reference stations to provide real-time correction data to a UAV, enabling centimeter-level positioning accuracy. This approach eliminates the need for ground control points (GCPs), reducing both costs and survey time. However, its application in multi-temporal soil erosion analysis remains insufficiently researched. In this paper the NRTK approach in GCD analysis is evaluated using Matrice 210 RTK V2 at two case studies. In addition, the absolute accuracy of the NRTK was tested on three other sites. Although achieved results can be regarded as promising, especially at lower altitudes, this research highlights drawbacks when employing the NRTK in analysing soil erosion measurement. Namely, the use of the DG-based models in GCD analysis generated unreliable results when compared with the reference model derived using the SfM photogrammetry with GCP. In both study sites, the NRTK approach significantly overestimated the amount of accumulated sediment, affected the total net sediment difference, and eliminated a substantial amount of change. Although the NRTK approach shows limitations in reliably quantifying volumetric changes in soil erosion measurements, results indicate that NRTK can be applied for analyzing linear gully headcut retreat rates. For applications where achieving the lowest absolute total error is not a priority, NRTK can be a relatively reliable solution. However, researchers should exercise caution when using it to analyze soil erosion over different time scales, particularly if the rate of morphological change is low.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Geomatics
Applied Geomatics REMOTE SENSING-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
61
期刊介绍: Applied Geomatics (AGMJ) is the official journal of SIFET the Italian Society of Photogrammetry and Topography and covers all aspects and information on scientific and technical advances in the geomatics sciences. The Journal publishes innovative contributions in geomatics applications ranging from the integration of instruments, methodologies and technologies and their use in the environmental sciences, engineering and other natural sciences. The areas of interest include many research fields such as: remote sensing, close range and videometric photogrammetry, image analysis, digital mapping, land and geographic information systems, geographic information science, integrated geodesy, spatial data analysis, heritage recording; network adjustment and numerical processes. Furthermore, Applied Geomatics is open to articles from all areas of deformation measurements and analysis, structural engineering, mechanical engineering and all trends in earth and planetary survey science and space technology. The Journal also contains notices of conferences and international workshops, industry news, and information on new products. It provides a useful forum for professional and academic scientists involved in geomatics science and technology. Information on Open Research Funding and Support may be found here: https://www.springernature.com/gp/open-research/institutional-agreements
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信