{"title":"JKR与DMT接触模型在增材制造粉末扩散DEM模拟中的比较研究","authors":"Sujith Reddy Jaggannagari, Yixiang Gan, Ratna Kumar Annabattula","doi":"10.1007/s40571-024-00894-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Powder spreading is the fundamental and most important process of powder bed fusion additive manufacturing. Powder particles experience cohesive forces due to their micron size, and these forces influence the quality of the layer. The dynamics of powder spreading is simulated using the discrete element method (DEM). DEM contact models with non-cohesive and cohesive interactions were used in past studies. This work compares two predominant cohesion contact models, the Johnson–Kendall–Roberts (JKR) and Derjaguin–Muller–Toporov (DMT). The influence of cohesion parameters and particle size on the spread layer quality is analysed. Additionally, mesoscopic analysis is carried out to gain insights into the behaviour of the spreading mechanism. The Tabor parameter (<span>\\(\\lambda _{\\textrm{T}}\\)</span>) that establishes the suitability of a specific cohesion model is investigated in the context of powder spreading process. Both models predict similar packing fractions at lower <span>\\(\\lambda _{\\textrm{T}}\\)</span>, whereas, at higher values of the <span>\\(\\lambda _{\\textrm{T}}\\)</span>, the contact forces of the JKR and DMT models diverge, leading to differences in packing fractions and local particle configurations in the spread layer. The findings demonstrate that the JKR model is applicable across the entire range of Tabor parameter.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":524,"journal":{"name":"Computational Particle Mechanics","volume":"12 3","pages":"1683 - 1699"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative study of JKR and DMT contact models for the DEM simulation of powder spreading in additive manufacturing\",\"authors\":\"Sujith Reddy Jaggannagari, Yixiang Gan, Ratna Kumar Annabattula\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40571-024-00894-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Powder spreading is the fundamental and most important process of powder bed fusion additive manufacturing. Powder particles experience cohesive forces due to their micron size, and these forces influence the quality of the layer. The dynamics of powder spreading is simulated using the discrete element method (DEM). DEM contact models with non-cohesive and cohesive interactions were used in past studies. This work compares two predominant cohesion contact models, the Johnson–Kendall–Roberts (JKR) and Derjaguin–Muller–Toporov (DMT). The influence of cohesion parameters and particle size on the spread layer quality is analysed. Additionally, mesoscopic analysis is carried out to gain insights into the behaviour of the spreading mechanism. The Tabor parameter (<span>\\\\(\\\\lambda _{\\\\textrm{T}}\\\\)</span>) that establishes the suitability of a specific cohesion model is investigated in the context of powder spreading process. Both models predict similar packing fractions at lower <span>\\\\(\\\\lambda _{\\\\textrm{T}}\\\\)</span>, whereas, at higher values of the <span>\\\\(\\\\lambda _{\\\\textrm{T}}\\\\)</span>, the contact forces of the JKR and DMT models diverge, leading to differences in packing fractions and local particle configurations in the spread layer. The findings demonstrate that the JKR model is applicable across the entire range of Tabor parameter.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":524,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computational Particle Mechanics\",\"volume\":\"12 3\",\"pages\":\"1683 - 1699\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computational Particle Mechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40571-024-00894-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computational Particle Mechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40571-024-00894-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
A comparative study of JKR and DMT contact models for the DEM simulation of powder spreading in additive manufacturing
Powder spreading is the fundamental and most important process of powder bed fusion additive manufacturing. Powder particles experience cohesive forces due to their micron size, and these forces influence the quality of the layer. The dynamics of powder spreading is simulated using the discrete element method (DEM). DEM contact models with non-cohesive and cohesive interactions were used in past studies. This work compares two predominant cohesion contact models, the Johnson–Kendall–Roberts (JKR) and Derjaguin–Muller–Toporov (DMT). The influence of cohesion parameters and particle size on the spread layer quality is analysed. Additionally, mesoscopic analysis is carried out to gain insights into the behaviour of the spreading mechanism. The Tabor parameter (\(\lambda _{\textrm{T}}\)) that establishes the suitability of a specific cohesion model is investigated in the context of powder spreading process. Both models predict similar packing fractions at lower \(\lambda _{\textrm{T}}\), whereas, at higher values of the \(\lambda _{\textrm{T}}\), the contact forces of the JKR and DMT models diverge, leading to differences in packing fractions and local particle configurations in the spread layer. The findings demonstrate that the JKR model is applicable across the entire range of Tabor parameter.
期刊介绍:
GENERAL OBJECTIVES: Computational Particle Mechanics (CPM) is a quarterly journal with the goal of publishing full-length original articles addressing the modeling and simulation of systems involving particles and particle methods. The goal is to enhance communication among researchers in the applied sciences who use "particles'''' in one form or another in their research.
SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES: Particle-based materials and numerical methods have become wide-spread in the natural and applied sciences, engineering, biology. The term "particle methods/mechanics'''' has now come to imply several different things to researchers in the 21st century, including:
(a) Particles as a physical unit in granular media, particulate flows, plasmas, swarms, etc.,
(b) Particles representing material phases in continua at the meso-, micro-and nano-scale and
(c) Particles as a discretization unit in continua and discontinua in numerical methods such as
Discrete Element Methods (DEM), Particle Finite Element Methods (PFEM), Molecular Dynamics (MD), and Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH), to name a few.