弹性网回归、岭回归和决策树回归预测化合物皮肤渗透性

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Kevin Ita, Pegah Capaul, Pardis Khani
{"title":"弹性网回归、岭回归和决策树回归预测化合物皮肤渗透性","authors":"Kevin Ita,&nbsp;Pegah Capaul,&nbsp;Pardis Khani","doi":"10.1007/s12247-025-10025-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The aim of this project was to predict the skin permeability of compounds in three modified datasets (Steinmetz et al., Stevens et al. as well as Wilschut et al.).</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>We employed Elasticnet, Ridge and Decision Tree Regression algorithms to forecast the skin permeability values of these compounds.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>When the Ridge regression technique was applied to the modified Wilschut et al dataset, the mean squared error was 0.20, the mean absolute error was 0.33 and the coefficient of determination (R²) was 0.61. The application of the same technique to the modified Stevens et al. dataset resulted in a mean squared error of 1.04, a mean absolute error of 0.5172 and an R-squared value of 0.18. The utilization of the Ridge regression method on the modified Steinmetz et al. dataset resulted in a mean squared error of 0.65, a mean absolute error of 0.67 and an R-squared Score of 0.48. When the Elasticnet regression approach was used on the modified Wilschut et al, the mean squared error was 0.24 and the coefficient of determination (R²) was 0.60. The utilization of the Elasticnet regression technique on the modified Steinmetz et al dataset led to a mean squared error of 0.88 and the coefficient of determination (R²) of 0.30. In comparison, Elasticnet regression technique on the modified Stevens et al dataset led to a mean squared error of 0.32 and the coefficient of determination (R²) of 0.42. The utilization of the Decision Tree(DT) regression on the modified Wilschut et al. dataset, resulted in the mean squared error of 0.28 and the coefficient of determination (R²) of 0.53. Decision Tree regression technique on the modified Stevens et al. dataset yielded a mean squared error: 0.31 and an R-squared Score :of 0.66. When the DT regression method was used on the Steinmetz et al dataset, the mean squared error was 0.89 and the R-squared Score was 0.14.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our comparison analysis utilizing ElasticNet, Ridge, and Decision Tree regression models to forecast skin permeability across three datasets provides significant insights into the relationship between data quality and model efficacy. This finding is consistent with and enhances the advancing field of computer modeling in cutaneous absorption, specifically in medication development, cosmetic safety, and regulatory science.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":656,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation","volume":"20 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting Skin Permeability of Compounds with Elasticnet, Ridge and Decision Tree Regression Methods\",\"authors\":\"Kevin Ita,&nbsp;Pegah Capaul,&nbsp;Pardis Khani\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12247-025-10025-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The aim of this project was to predict the skin permeability of compounds in three modified datasets (Steinmetz et al., Stevens et al. as well as Wilschut et al.).</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>We employed Elasticnet, Ridge and Decision Tree Regression algorithms to forecast the skin permeability values of these compounds.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>When the Ridge regression technique was applied to the modified Wilschut et al dataset, the mean squared error was 0.20, the mean absolute error was 0.33 and the coefficient of determination (R²) was 0.61. The application of the same technique to the modified Stevens et al. dataset resulted in a mean squared error of 1.04, a mean absolute error of 0.5172 and an R-squared value of 0.18. The utilization of the Ridge regression method on the modified Steinmetz et al. dataset resulted in a mean squared error of 0.65, a mean absolute error of 0.67 and an R-squared Score of 0.48. When the Elasticnet regression approach was used on the modified Wilschut et al, the mean squared error was 0.24 and the coefficient of determination (R²) was 0.60. The utilization of the Elasticnet regression technique on the modified Steinmetz et al dataset led to a mean squared error of 0.88 and the coefficient of determination (R²) of 0.30. In comparison, Elasticnet regression technique on the modified Stevens et al dataset led to a mean squared error of 0.32 and the coefficient of determination (R²) of 0.42. The utilization of the Decision Tree(DT) regression on the modified Wilschut et al. dataset, resulted in the mean squared error of 0.28 and the coefficient of determination (R²) of 0.53. Decision Tree regression technique on the modified Stevens et al. dataset yielded a mean squared error: 0.31 and an R-squared Score :of 0.66. When the DT regression method was used on the Steinmetz et al dataset, the mean squared error was 0.89 and the R-squared Score was 0.14.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our comparison analysis utilizing ElasticNet, Ridge, and Decision Tree regression models to forecast skin permeability across three datasets provides significant insights into the relationship between data quality and model efficacy. This finding is consistent with and enhances the advancing field of computer modeling in cutaneous absorption, specifically in medication development, cosmetic safety, and regulatory science.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation\",\"volume\":\"20 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12247-025-10025-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12247-025-10025-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本项目旨在预测三个修改数据集(Steinmetz et al., Stevens et al.以及Wilschut et al.)中化合物的皮肤渗透性。方法采用Elasticnet、Ridge和Decision Tree回归算法预测化合物的透性值。结果将Ridge回归技术应用于修正后的Wilschut等数据集,均方误差为0.20,平均绝对误差为0.33,决定系数(R²)为0.61。将相同的技术应用于修改后的Stevens等人的数据集,结果均方误差为1.04,平均绝对误差为0.5172,r平方值为0.18。对修改后的Steinmetz等人的数据集使用Ridge回归方法,平均平方误差为0.65,平均绝对误差为0.67,r平方分数为0.48。对修正的Wilschut等人采用Elasticnet回归方法,均方误差为0.24,决定系数(R²)为0.60。对修改后的Steinmetz等数据集使用Elasticnet回归技术,均方误差为0.88,决定系数(R²)为0.30。相比之下,在改进的Stevens等数据集上使用Elasticnet回归技术得到的均方误差为0.32,决定系数(R²)为0.42。对修改后的Wilschut等人的数据集使用决策树(DT)回归,结果均方误差为0.28,决定系数(R²)为0.53。决策树回归技术对改良的Stevens等人数据集的均方误差为0.31,r平方得分为0.66。在Steinmetz等人的数据集上使用DT回归方法时,均方误差为0.89,R-squared Score为0.14。我们利用ElasticNet、Ridge和Decision Tree回归模型预测三个数据集的皮肤渗透性,提供了数据质量和模型有效性之间关系的重要见解。这一发现与计算机模拟在皮肤吸收领域的发展是一致的,并加强了这一领域的发展,特别是在药物开发、化妆品安全和监管科学方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predicting Skin Permeability of Compounds with Elasticnet, Ridge and Decision Tree Regression Methods

Purpose

The aim of this project was to predict the skin permeability of compounds in three modified datasets (Steinmetz et al., Stevens et al. as well as Wilschut et al.).

Methods

We employed Elasticnet, Ridge and Decision Tree Regression algorithms to forecast the skin permeability values of these compounds.

Results

When the Ridge regression technique was applied to the modified Wilschut et al dataset, the mean squared error was 0.20, the mean absolute error was 0.33 and the coefficient of determination (R²) was 0.61. The application of the same technique to the modified Stevens et al. dataset resulted in a mean squared error of 1.04, a mean absolute error of 0.5172 and an R-squared value of 0.18. The utilization of the Ridge regression method on the modified Steinmetz et al. dataset resulted in a mean squared error of 0.65, a mean absolute error of 0.67 and an R-squared Score of 0.48. When the Elasticnet regression approach was used on the modified Wilschut et al, the mean squared error was 0.24 and the coefficient of determination (R²) was 0.60. The utilization of the Elasticnet regression technique on the modified Steinmetz et al dataset led to a mean squared error of 0.88 and the coefficient of determination (R²) of 0.30. In comparison, Elasticnet regression technique on the modified Stevens et al dataset led to a mean squared error of 0.32 and the coefficient of determination (R²) of 0.42. The utilization of the Decision Tree(DT) regression on the modified Wilschut et al. dataset, resulted in the mean squared error of 0.28 and the coefficient of determination (R²) of 0.53. Decision Tree regression technique on the modified Stevens et al. dataset yielded a mean squared error: 0.31 and an R-squared Score :of 0.66. When the DT regression method was used on the Steinmetz et al dataset, the mean squared error was 0.89 and the R-squared Score was 0.14.

Conclusion

Our comparison analysis utilizing ElasticNet, Ridge, and Decision Tree regression models to forecast skin permeability across three datasets provides significant insights into the relationship between data quality and model efficacy. This finding is consistent with and enhances the advancing field of computer modeling in cutaneous absorption, specifically in medication development, cosmetic safety, and regulatory science.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation
Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
3.80%
发文量
90
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation (JPI), is an international, multidisciplinary peer-reviewed scientific journal dedicated to publishing high quality papers emphasizing innovative research and applied technologies within the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries. JPI''s goal is to be the premier communication vehicle for the critical body of knowledge that is needed for scientific evolution and technical innovation, from R&D to market. Topics will fall under the following categories: Materials science, Product design, Process design, optimization, automation and control, Facilities; Information management, Regulatory policy and strategy, Supply chain developments , Education and professional development, Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation publishes four issues a year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信