绿色政策、地缘政治风险、进口对绿色生产的影响:G7国家可持续发展目标政策的制定

IF 6 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Ahsan Anwar, Afshan Hamid, Magdalena Radulescu, Arshian Sharif
{"title":"绿色政策、地缘政治风险、进口对绿色生产的影响:G7国家可持续发展目标政策的制定","authors":"Ahsan Anwar,&nbsp;Afshan Hamid,&nbsp;Magdalena Radulescu,&nbsp;Arshian Sharif","doi":"10.1186/s12302-025-01173-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the modern era, sustainability is integrated with development. The industrial sector keeps pace with ecology and follows the path of modernization through innovations directly related to environmental sustainability. To preserve the environment in this fast-growing global economy, the existing literature identifies various socio-economic, macroeconomic, and institutional factors influencing environmental quality. However, the available studies largely ignore the influence of geopolitical risk, environmental policy stringency, and imports on green production practices. To bridge this void, this study aims to analyze the impact of geopolitical risk and environmental policy stringency on green production practices. In this regard, the panel of G7 countries has been chosen for the period from 1990 to 2020, as this intergovernmental and political and economic forum better suits our problem statement. To make empirical analysis extensively, the Panel Quantile Regression (PQR) technique has been applied, which has several advantages over the standard linear regression techniques of panel data analysis, particularly in dealing with outliers in the data set and heterogeneity across various quantiles of the dependent variable distribution. The empirical outcomes enunciate the adverse impact of geopolitical risk and imports on green production practices in G7 countries with a range of − 0.85 to − 0.042 and − 0.322 to − 0.191, respectively. Conversely, strict environmental policy has a constructive and meaningful impact on green production practices, following a range of 0.148 to 0.269. In the last section, considering the empirical outcomes, the study suggests relevant policy suggestions which also help G7 economies to secure several sustainable development goals (SDGs), such as SDG 9 (industrial and innovation), SDG 12 (responsible consumption and production), SDG 13 (climate change), SDG 16 (promoting peace, justice system, and strengthening institutions), and SDG 17 (partnerships for the common goals). </p><h3>Graphical Abstract</h3>\n<div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":546,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Sciences Europe","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s12302-025-01173-y.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of green policies, geopolitical risks, and imports on green production: formulating the SDG policies for G7 countries\",\"authors\":\"Ahsan Anwar,&nbsp;Afshan Hamid,&nbsp;Magdalena Radulescu,&nbsp;Arshian Sharif\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12302-025-01173-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In the modern era, sustainability is integrated with development. The industrial sector keeps pace with ecology and follows the path of modernization through innovations directly related to environmental sustainability. To preserve the environment in this fast-growing global economy, the existing literature identifies various socio-economic, macroeconomic, and institutional factors influencing environmental quality. However, the available studies largely ignore the influence of geopolitical risk, environmental policy stringency, and imports on green production practices. To bridge this void, this study aims to analyze the impact of geopolitical risk and environmental policy stringency on green production practices. In this regard, the panel of G7 countries has been chosen for the period from 1990 to 2020, as this intergovernmental and political and economic forum better suits our problem statement. To make empirical analysis extensively, the Panel Quantile Regression (PQR) technique has been applied, which has several advantages over the standard linear regression techniques of panel data analysis, particularly in dealing with outliers in the data set and heterogeneity across various quantiles of the dependent variable distribution. The empirical outcomes enunciate the adverse impact of geopolitical risk and imports on green production practices in G7 countries with a range of − 0.85 to − 0.042 and − 0.322 to − 0.191, respectively. Conversely, strict environmental policy has a constructive and meaningful impact on green production practices, following a range of 0.148 to 0.269. In the last section, considering the empirical outcomes, the study suggests relevant policy suggestions which also help G7 economies to secure several sustainable development goals (SDGs), such as SDG 9 (industrial and innovation), SDG 12 (responsible consumption and production), SDG 13 (climate change), SDG 16 (promoting peace, justice system, and strengthening institutions), and SDG 17 (partnerships for the common goals). </p><h3>Graphical Abstract</h3>\\n<div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":546,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Sciences Europe\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s12302-025-01173-y.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Sciences Europe\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12302-025-01173-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Sciences Europe","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12302-025-01173-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在现代,可持续发展与发展融为一体。工业部门与生态保持同步,通过与环境可持续性直接相关的创新,走现代化道路。为了在快速增长的全球经济中保护环境,现有文献确定了影响环境质量的各种社会经济、宏观经济和制度因素。然而,现有的研究在很大程度上忽略了地缘政治风险、环境政策严格程度和进口对绿色生产实践的影响。为了弥补这一空白,本研究旨在分析地缘政治风险和环境政策严格程度对绿色生产实践的影响。在这方面,在1990年至2020年期间选择了七国集团国家小组,因为这一政府间政治和经济论坛更适合我们的问题陈述。为了进行广泛的实证分析,应用了面板分位数回归(PQR)技术,它比面板数据分析的标准线性回归技术有几个优点,特别是在处理数据集中的异常值和因变量分布的各个分位数的异质性方面。实证结果表明,地缘政治风险和进口对G7国家绿色生产实践的不利影响范围分别为- 0.85 ~ - 0.042和- 0.322 ~ - 0.191。相反,严格的环境政策对绿色生产实践具有建设性和有意义的影响,其范围为0.148至0.269。在最后一部分中,考虑到实证结果,研究提出了相关的政策建议,这些建议也有助于G7经济体实现几个可持续发展目标(SDG),如SDG 9(工业和创新)、SDG 12(负责任的消费和生产)、SDG 13(气候变化)、SDG 16(促进和平、司法系统和加强机构)和SDG 17(共同目标的伙伴关系)。图形抽象
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of green policies, geopolitical risks, and imports on green production: formulating the SDG policies for G7 countries

In the modern era, sustainability is integrated with development. The industrial sector keeps pace with ecology and follows the path of modernization through innovations directly related to environmental sustainability. To preserve the environment in this fast-growing global economy, the existing literature identifies various socio-economic, macroeconomic, and institutional factors influencing environmental quality. However, the available studies largely ignore the influence of geopolitical risk, environmental policy stringency, and imports on green production practices. To bridge this void, this study aims to analyze the impact of geopolitical risk and environmental policy stringency on green production practices. In this regard, the panel of G7 countries has been chosen for the period from 1990 to 2020, as this intergovernmental and political and economic forum better suits our problem statement. To make empirical analysis extensively, the Panel Quantile Regression (PQR) technique has been applied, which has several advantages over the standard linear regression techniques of panel data analysis, particularly in dealing with outliers in the data set and heterogeneity across various quantiles of the dependent variable distribution. The empirical outcomes enunciate the adverse impact of geopolitical risk and imports on green production practices in G7 countries with a range of − 0.85 to − 0.042 and − 0.322 to − 0.191, respectively. Conversely, strict environmental policy has a constructive and meaningful impact on green production practices, following a range of 0.148 to 0.269. In the last section, considering the empirical outcomes, the study suggests relevant policy suggestions which also help G7 economies to secure several sustainable development goals (SDGs), such as SDG 9 (industrial and innovation), SDG 12 (responsible consumption and production), SDG 13 (climate change), SDG 16 (promoting peace, justice system, and strengthening institutions), and SDG 17 (partnerships for the common goals).

Graphical Abstract

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Sciences Europe
Environmental Sciences Europe Environmental Science-Pollution
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
1.70%
发文量
110
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: ESEU is an international journal, focusing primarily on Europe, with a broad scope covering all aspects of environmental sciences, including the main topic regulation. ESEU will discuss the entanglement between environmental sciences and regulation because, in recent years, there have been misunderstandings and even disagreement between stakeholders in these two areas. ESEU will help to improve the comprehension of issues between environmental sciences and regulation. ESEU will be an outlet from the German-speaking (DACH) countries to Europe and an inlet from Europe to the DACH countries regarding environmental sciences and regulation. Moreover, ESEU will facilitate the exchange of ideas and interaction between Europe and the DACH countries regarding environmental regulatory issues. Although Europe is at the center of ESEU, the journal will not exclude the rest of the world, because regulatory issues pertaining to environmental sciences can be fully seen only from a global perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信