人工智能在精确癌症检测中的革命性进展:非侵入性技术的全面回顾

IF 12.1 2区 工程技术 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Hari Mohan Rai, Joon Yoo, Serhii Dashkevych
{"title":"人工智能在精确癌症检测中的革命性进展:非侵入性技术的全面回顾","authors":"Hari Mohan Rai,&nbsp;Joon Yoo,&nbsp;Serhii Dashkevych","doi":"10.1007/s11831-024-10219-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Cancer continues to be a primary cause of death worldwide, highlighting the critical need for early diagnosis methods. Automated, quick, and efficient technologies are critical to this endeavor, yet considerable gaps remain in this field. A comprehensive review was undertaken to examine seven cancer types characterized by elevated prevalence and mortality: lung, prostate, brain, skin, breast, leukemia, and colorectal cancer. The study aimed to reveal gaps in the existing research and compare traditional machine learning (TML) with deep learning (DL) methodologies, since such contrasts have been not much explored. A total of 320 publications were carefully chosen for study, including 150 that focused on TML methods and 170 that address DL techniques for the classification of cancer. Diverse parameters were used to assess these investigations, encompassing publication year, employed databases, data sample, classifier, modalities, and evaluation metrics. Separate evaluations were conducted for each cancer type and methodology, yielding 14 unique review tables. The assessment of each cancer type using ML/DL independently relied on four standard criteria: High performance (&gt; 99%), Limited performance (&lt; 85%), key findings, and key challenges. These studies were accompanied by a brief descriptive outline of the features, classifiers, public databases, and evaluation metrics that were utilized in the review process. The study concluded by offering general conclusions that highlighted the overall findings, overall challenges observed during the investigation. This thorough review seeks to improve clinical applications and guide future research initiatives in the persistent fight against cancer.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55473,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering","volume":"32 4","pages":"2467 - 2548"},"PeriodicalIF":12.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transformative Advances in AI for Precise Cancer Detection: A Comprehensive Review of Non-Invasive Techniques\",\"authors\":\"Hari Mohan Rai,&nbsp;Joon Yoo,&nbsp;Serhii Dashkevych\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11831-024-10219-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Cancer continues to be a primary cause of death worldwide, highlighting the critical need for early diagnosis methods. Automated, quick, and efficient technologies are critical to this endeavor, yet considerable gaps remain in this field. A comprehensive review was undertaken to examine seven cancer types characterized by elevated prevalence and mortality: lung, prostate, brain, skin, breast, leukemia, and colorectal cancer. The study aimed to reveal gaps in the existing research and compare traditional machine learning (TML) with deep learning (DL) methodologies, since such contrasts have been not much explored. A total of 320 publications were carefully chosen for study, including 150 that focused on TML methods and 170 that address DL techniques for the classification of cancer. Diverse parameters were used to assess these investigations, encompassing publication year, employed databases, data sample, classifier, modalities, and evaluation metrics. Separate evaluations were conducted for each cancer type and methodology, yielding 14 unique review tables. The assessment of each cancer type using ML/DL independently relied on four standard criteria: High performance (&gt; 99%), Limited performance (&lt; 85%), key findings, and key challenges. These studies were accompanied by a brief descriptive outline of the features, classifiers, public databases, and evaluation metrics that were utilized in the review process. The study concluded by offering general conclusions that highlighted the overall findings, overall challenges observed during the investigation. This thorough review seeks to improve clinical applications and guide future research initiatives in the persistent fight against cancer.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55473,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering\",\"volume\":\"32 4\",\"pages\":\"2467 - 2548\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11831-024-10219-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11831-024-10219-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

癌症仍然是世界范围内死亡的主要原因,这突出了对早期诊断方法的迫切需要。自动化、快速和高效的技术对这一努力至关重要,但在这一领域仍存在相当大的差距。对肺癌、前列腺癌、脑癌、皮肤癌、乳腺癌、白血病和结直肠癌等7种以发病率和死亡率高为特征的癌症类型进行了全面审查。该研究旨在揭示现有研究中的差距,并将传统机器学习(TML)与深度学习(DL)方法进行比较,因为这种对比尚未得到太多探索。总共有320份出版物被精心挑选出来进行研究,其中150份集中在TML方法上,170份集中在用于癌症分类的DL技术上。使用不同的参数来评估这些调查,包括出版年份、使用的数据库、数据样本、分类器、模式和评估指标。对每种癌症类型和方法进行了单独的评估,得出了14个独特的审查表。使用ML/DL独立评估每种癌症类型依赖于四个标准标准:高性能(> 99%),有限性能(< 85%),关键发现和关键挑战。这些研究都附有特征、分类器、公共数据库和审查过程中使用的评估指标的简要描述大纲。这项研究最后给出了一般性结论,强调了调查期间观察到的总体发现和总体挑战。这篇全面的综述旨在改善临床应用,并指导未来的研究活动,以持续对抗癌症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Transformative Advances in AI for Precise Cancer Detection: A Comprehensive Review of Non-Invasive Techniques

Cancer continues to be a primary cause of death worldwide, highlighting the critical need for early diagnosis methods. Automated, quick, and efficient technologies are critical to this endeavor, yet considerable gaps remain in this field. A comprehensive review was undertaken to examine seven cancer types characterized by elevated prevalence and mortality: lung, prostate, brain, skin, breast, leukemia, and colorectal cancer. The study aimed to reveal gaps in the existing research and compare traditional machine learning (TML) with deep learning (DL) methodologies, since such contrasts have been not much explored. A total of 320 publications were carefully chosen for study, including 150 that focused on TML methods and 170 that address DL techniques for the classification of cancer. Diverse parameters were used to assess these investigations, encompassing publication year, employed databases, data sample, classifier, modalities, and evaluation metrics. Separate evaluations were conducted for each cancer type and methodology, yielding 14 unique review tables. The assessment of each cancer type using ML/DL independently relied on four standard criteria: High performance (> 99%), Limited performance (< 85%), key findings, and key challenges. These studies were accompanied by a brief descriptive outline of the features, classifiers, public databases, and evaluation metrics that were utilized in the review process. The study concluded by offering general conclusions that highlighted the overall findings, overall challenges observed during the investigation. This thorough review seeks to improve clinical applications and guide future research initiatives in the persistent fight against cancer.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.80
自引率
4.10%
发文量
153
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering Aim and Scope: Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering serves as an active forum for disseminating research and advanced practices in computational engineering, particularly focusing on mechanics and related fields. The journal emphasizes extended state-of-the-art reviews in selected areas, a unique feature of its publication. Review Format: Reviews published in the journal offer: A survey of current literature Critical exposition of topics in their full complexity By organizing the information in this manner, readers can quickly grasp the focus, coverage, and unique features of the Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信