化学应激源对淡水生态系统功能影响的meta分析

IF 6 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Alexander Feckler, Ralf Schulz, Ralf B. Schäfer
{"title":"化学应激源对淡水生态系统功能影响的meta分析","authors":"Alexander Feckler,&nbsp;Ralf Schulz,&nbsp;Ralf B. Schäfer","doi":"10.1186/s12302-025-01167-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Despite considerable progress in our capacity for predicting the response of different trophic levels to chemical stressors, generalizable relations between chemical stressors and ecosystem functions are lacking. We addressed this knowledge gap by conducting a meta-analysis (159 studies; 350 observations) on the responses of freshwater ecosystem functions (community respiration, organic matter decomposition, nutrient cycling, photosynthesis, and primary production) under controlled conditions (laboratory or outdoor mesocosms) to pesticides, pharmaceuticals, and metals.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>We identified monotonic dose–response relationships between standardized chemical concentrations, in terms of toxic units, for selected chemical use groups and organic matter decomposition by decomposer-detritivore-systems as well as photosynthesis by algae and macrophytes. By contrast, consistent relationships were not found for other ecosystem functions, such as organic matter decomposition by microbial decomposers alone and primary production under the conditions studied. Importantly, the shape and direction of the relationships identified here match those reported in field-based studies, indicating a decrease in functioning as chemical stress increases, strengthening the ecological relevance of our findings. Finally, we found a disconnect between regulatory ecological quality targets and ecological outcomes, highlighting a need to re-evaluate risk assessment approaches if they are supposed to be ecologically meaningful and protective of ecosystem functions.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our analyses demonstrate the potential to derive chemical stress–ecosystem function relationships from currently available data, which already reveal adverse effects on specific ecosystem functions. However, several key research gaps must be addressed to improve the specificity and predictive power of such relationships. These include expanding the range of chemical stressors investigated, accounting for the context-dependency of chemical effects on ecosystem functions, and complementing laboratory studies with semi-field and field experiments to verify and validate laboratory-derived findings under more realistic environmental conditions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":546,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Sciences Europe","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s12302-025-01167-w.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Meta-analysis on the effects of chemical stressors on freshwater ecosystem functions\",\"authors\":\"Alexander Feckler,&nbsp;Ralf Schulz,&nbsp;Ralf B. Schäfer\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12302-025-01167-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Despite considerable progress in our capacity for predicting the response of different trophic levels to chemical stressors, generalizable relations between chemical stressors and ecosystem functions are lacking. We addressed this knowledge gap by conducting a meta-analysis (159 studies; 350 observations) on the responses of freshwater ecosystem functions (community respiration, organic matter decomposition, nutrient cycling, photosynthesis, and primary production) under controlled conditions (laboratory or outdoor mesocosms) to pesticides, pharmaceuticals, and metals.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>We identified monotonic dose–response relationships between standardized chemical concentrations, in terms of toxic units, for selected chemical use groups and organic matter decomposition by decomposer-detritivore-systems as well as photosynthesis by algae and macrophytes. By contrast, consistent relationships were not found for other ecosystem functions, such as organic matter decomposition by microbial decomposers alone and primary production under the conditions studied. Importantly, the shape and direction of the relationships identified here match those reported in field-based studies, indicating a decrease in functioning as chemical stress increases, strengthening the ecological relevance of our findings. Finally, we found a disconnect between regulatory ecological quality targets and ecological outcomes, highlighting a need to re-evaluate risk assessment approaches if they are supposed to be ecologically meaningful and protective of ecosystem functions.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our analyses demonstrate the potential to derive chemical stress–ecosystem function relationships from currently available data, which already reveal adverse effects on specific ecosystem functions. However, several key research gaps must be addressed to improve the specificity and predictive power of such relationships. These include expanding the range of chemical stressors investigated, accounting for the context-dependency of chemical effects on ecosystem functions, and complementing laboratory studies with semi-field and field experiments to verify and validate laboratory-derived findings under more realistic environmental conditions.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":546,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Sciences Europe\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s12302-025-01167-w.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Sciences Europe\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12302-025-01167-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Sciences Europe","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12302-025-01167-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管我们在预测不同营养水平对化学胁迫的反应方面取得了相当大的进展,但化学胁迫与生态系统功能之间缺乏可推广的关系。我们通过对淡水生态系统功能(群落呼吸、有机物分解、养分循环、光合作用和初级生产)在受控条件下(实验室或室外中生态环境)对杀虫剂、药物和金属的响应进行meta分析(159项研究;350项观察),解决了这一知识差距。结果:我们确定了选定化学用途组的标准化化学浓度(以毒性单位表示)与分解者-营养物系统的有机物分解以及藻类和大型植物的光合作用之间的单调剂量-响应关系。相比之下,在研究条件下,其他生态系统功能(如微生物分解者单独分解有机物和初级生产)没有发现一致的关系。重要的是,这里确定的关系的形状和方向与实地研究报告相匹配,表明随着化学压力的增加,功能下降,加强了我们研究结果的生态相关性。最后,我们发现监管生态质量目标与生态结果之间存在脱节,强调需要重新评估风险评估方法,如果它们应该具有生态意义并保护生态系统功能。结论sour分析显示了从现有数据中推导出化学应力-生态系统功能关系的潜力,这些关系已经揭示了对特定生态系统功能的不利影响。然而,必须解决几个关键的研究空白,以提高这种关系的特异性和预测能力。这些措施包括扩大所调查的化学压力源的范围,考虑化学效应对生态系统功能的环境依赖性,以及用半现场和现场实验补充实验室研究,以在更现实的环境条件下验证和验证实验室得出的发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Meta-analysis on the effects of chemical stressors on freshwater ecosystem functions

Background

Despite considerable progress in our capacity for predicting the response of different trophic levels to chemical stressors, generalizable relations between chemical stressors and ecosystem functions are lacking. We addressed this knowledge gap by conducting a meta-analysis (159 studies; 350 observations) on the responses of freshwater ecosystem functions (community respiration, organic matter decomposition, nutrient cycling, photosynthesis, and primary production) under controlled conditions (laboratory or outdoor mesocosms) to pesticides, pharmaceuticals, and metals.

Results

We identified monotonic dose–response relationships between standardized chemical concentrations, in terms of toxic units, for selected chemical use groups and organic matter decomposition by decomposer-detritivore-systems as well as photosynthesis by algae and macrophytes. By contrast, consistent relationships were not found for other ecosystem functions, such as organic matter decomposition by microbial decomposers alone and primary production under the conditions studied. Importantly, the shape and direction of the relationships identified here match those reported in field-based studies, indicating a decrease in functioning as chemical stress increases, strengthening the ecological relevance of our findings. Finally, we found a disconnect between regulatory ecological quality targets and ecological outcomes, highlighting a need to re-evaluate risk assessment approaches if they are supposed to be ecologically meaningful and protective of ecosystem functions.

Conclusions

Our analyses demonstrate the potential to derive chemical stress–ecosystem function relationships from currently available data, which already reveal adverse effects on specific ecosystem functions. However, several key research gaps must be addressed to improve the specificity and predictive power of such relationships. These include expanding the range of chemical stressors investigated, accounting for the context-dependency of chemical effects on ecosystem functions, and complementing laboratory studies with semi-field and field experiments to verify and validate laboratory-derived findings under more realistic environmental conditions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Sciences Europe
Environmental Sciences Europe Environmental Science-Pollution
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
1.70%
发文量
110
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: ESEU is an international journal, focusing primarily on Europe, with a broad scope covering all aspects of environmental sciences, including the main topic regulation. ESEU will discuss the entanglement between environmental sciences and regulation because, in recent years, there have been misunderstandings and even disagreement between stakeholders in these two areas. ESEU will help to improve the comprehension of issues between environmental sciences and regulation. ESEU will be an outlet from the German-speaking (DACH) countries to Europe and an inlet from Europe to the DACH countries regarding environmental sciences and regulation. Moreover, ESEU will facilitate the exchange of ideas and interaction between Europe and the DACH countries regarding environmental regulatory issues. Although Europe is at the center of ESEU, the journal will not exclude the rest of the world, because regulatory issues pertaining to environmental sciences can be fully seen only from a global perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信